Generating Random Graphs for Wireless Actuator Networks

In this paper, we consider graphs created by actuators (people, robots, vehicles etc.) in sensor-actuator networks. Most simulation studies for wireless ad hoc and sensor networks use connected random unit disk graphs generated by placing nodes randomly and independently from each other. However, in real life networks are created by actuators in a cooperative manner. Usually certain restrictions are imposed during the placement of a new node in order to improve network connectivity and functionality. This article is an initial study on how connected actuator graphs (CAG) can be generated by fast algorithms and what kind of desirable characteristics can be achieved compared to completely random graphs, especially for sparse node densities. We describe several CAG generation schemes where the next node (actuator) position is selected based on the distribution of the nodes already placed. In our Minimum Degree Proximity algorithm (MIN-DPA), a new node is placed to be a neighbor of an existing node with the lowest degree (number of neighbors). In our Maximum Degree Proximity algorithm (MAX-DPA), a new node cannot be placed to increase the degree of any existing node over a pre-specified parameter limit. We show that these new algorithms are significantly faster than the well-known random unit graph generation scheme for sparse graphs. The graphs generated by these new schemes are not necessarily drawn from the same distribution as those generated by the independent node placement. Thus, we explore their properties by studying their average node degree and partition patterns.

[1]  Piyush Gupta,et al.  Critical Power for Asymptotic Connectivity in Wireless Networks , 1999 .

[2]  Xiang-Yang Li,et al.  Fault tolerant deployment and topology control in wireless ad hoc networks , 2004, Wirel. Commun. Mob. Comput..

[3]  Jennifer C. Hou,et al.  On the critical total power for asymptotic k-connectivity in wireless networks , 2005, Proceedings IEEE 24th Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies..

[4]  D. Manjunath,et al.  On the connectivity in finite ad hoc networks , 2002, IEEE Communications Letters.

[5]  Mathew D. Penrose,et al.  On k-connectivity for a geometric random graph , 1999, Random Struct. Algorithms.

[6]  Dimitri P. Bertsekas,et al.  Data Networks , 1986 .

[7]  Paolo Santi,et al.  The Critical Transmitting Range for Connectivity in Sparse Wireless Ad Hoc Networks , 2003, IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput..

[8]  Ivan Stojmenovic,et al.  Loop-Free Hybrid Single-Path/Flooding Routing Algorithms with Guaranteed Delivery for Wireless Networks , 2001, IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst..

[9]  øöö Blockinø The Number of Neighbors Needed for Connectivity of Wireless Networks , 2002 .

[10]  Isaac Balberg Continuum Percolation , 2009, Encyclopedia of Complexity and Systems Science.

[11]  VI. Conclusions , 1971 .

[12]  Asser N. Tantawi,et al.  Connectivity properties of a packet radio network model , 1989, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[13]  Ivan Stojmenovic,et al.  Localized Algorithms for Detection of Critical Nodes and Links for Connectivity in Ad hoc Networks , 2004 .

[14]  Panganamala Ramana Kumar,et al.  The Number of Neighbors Needed for Connectivity of Wireless Networks , 2004, Wirel. Networks.

[15]  Patrick Thiran,et al.  Connectivity in ad-hoc and hybrid networks , 2002, Proceedings.Twenty-First Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies.

[16]  Andrea Vitaletti,et al.  Localized Techniques for Broadcasting in Wireless Sensor Networks , 2007, Algorithmica.