The equilibrium of rubble-pile satellites: The Darwin and Roche ellipsoids for gravitationally held granular aggregates

Abstract Many new small moons of the giant planets have been discovered recently. In parallel, satellites of several asteroids, e.g., Ida, have been found. Strikingly, a majority of these new-found planetary moons are estimated to have very low densities, which, along with their hypothesized accretionary origins, suggests a rubble internal structure. This, coupled to the fact that many asteroids are also thought to be particle aggregates held together principally by self-gravity, motivates the present investigation into the possible ellipsoidal shapes that a rubble-pile satellite may achieve as it orbits an aspherical primary. Conversely, knowledge of the shape will constrain the granular aggregate's orbit—the closer it gets to a primary, both primary's tidal effect and the satellite's spin are greater. We will assume that the primary body is sufficiently massive so as not to be influenced by the satellite. However, we will incorporate the primary's possible ellipsoidal shape, e.g., flattening at its poles in the case of a planet, and the proloidal shape of asteroids. In this, the present investigation is an extension of the first classical Darwin problem to granular aggregates. General equations defining an ellipsoidal rubble pile's equilibrium about an ellipsoidal primary are developed. They are then utilized to scrutinize the possible granular nature of small inner moons of the giant planets. It is found that most satellites satisfy constraints necessary to exist as equilibrated granular aggregates. Objects like Naiad, Metis and Adrastea appear to violate these limits, but in doing so, provide clues to their internal density and/or structure. We also recover the Roche limit for a granular satellite of a spherical primary, and employ it to study the martian satellites, Phobos and Deimos, as well as to make contact with earlier work of Davidsson [Davidsson, B., 2001. Icarus 149, 375–383]. The satellite's interior will be modeled as a rigid-plastic, cohesion-less material with a Drucker–Prager yield criterion. This rheology is a reasonable first model for rubble piles. We will employ an approximate volume-averaging procedure that is based on the classical method of moments, and is an extension of the virial method [Chandrasekhar, S., 1969. Ellipsoidal Figures of Equilibrium. Yale Univ. Press, New Haven] to granular solid bodies.

[1]  Joseph A. Burns,et al.  Contradictory clues as to the origin of the Martian moons , 1992 .

[2]  Subrahmanyan Chandrasekhar,et al.  Ellipsoidal Figures of Equilibrium , 1969 .

[3]  D. T. Greenwood Principles of dynamics , 1965 .

[4]  H. Kinoshita First-order perturbations of the two finite body problem , 1972 .

[5]  K. Holsapple,et al.  Tidal disruptions: II. A continuum theory for solid bodies with strength, with applications to the Solar System , 2008 .

[6]  Wai-Fah Chen,et al.  Plasticity for Structural Engineers , 1988 .

[7]  Irene A. Stegun,et al.  Handbook of Mathematical Functions. , 1966 .

[8]  M. W. Evans,et al.  REVISED ORBITS OF SATURN'S SMALL INNER SATELLITES , 2007 .

[9]  B. Davidsson,et al.  Tidal Splitting and Rotational Breakup of Solid Spheres , 1999 .

[10]  Keith A. Holsapple,et al.  Equilibrium Configurations of Solid Cohesionless Bodies , 2001 .

[11]  K. K. Rao Statics and kinematics of granular materials , 1995 .

[12]  J. Burns,et al.  THE SMALL INNER SATELLITES OF JUPITER , 1998 .

[13]  H. Aggarwal,et al.  Roche limit of a solid body , 1974 .

[14]  P. Thomas,et al.  Saturn's Small Inner Satellites: Clues to Their Origins , 2007, Science.

[15]  Carl D. Murray,et al.  Cassini ISS astrometric observations of the inner jovian satellites, Amalthea and Thebe , 2006 .

[16]  A. Love A treatise on the mathematical theory of elasticity , 1892 .

[17]  D. Scheeres,et al.  Mutual Potential of Homogeneous Polyhedra , 2005 .

[18]  V. Shor The motion of the Martian satellites , 1975 .

[19]  B. Davidsson,et al.  Tidal Splitting and Rotational Breakup of Solid Biaxial Ellipsoids , 2001 .

[20]  E. Karkoschka Sizes, shapes, and albedos of the inner satellites of Neptune , 2003 .

[21]  Ishan Sharma,et al.  Tidal encounters of ellipsoidal granular asteroids with planets , 2006 .

[22]  David G. Schaeffer,et al.  Instability in the evolution equations describing incompressible granular flow , 1987 .

[23]  C. Murray,et al.  Solar System Dynamics: Expansion of the Disturbing Function , 1999 .

[24]  A. Dobrovolskis,et al.  Internal stresses in phobos and other triaxial bodies , 1982 .

[25]  J. Anderson,et al.  Amalthea's Density Is Less Than That of Water , 2005, Science.

[26]  C. Porco An Explanation for Neptune's Ring Arcs , 1991, Science.

[27]  J. Burns,et al.  Cassini Imaging Science: Initial Results on Saturn's Rings and Small Satellites , 2005, Science.

[28]  Y. Fung Foundations of solid mechanics , 1965 .

[29]  Derek C. Richardson,et al.  Numerical experiments with rubble piles: equilibrium shapes and spins , 2005 .

[30]  Derek C. Richardson,et al.  Physical Characteristics and Possible Accretionary Origins for Saturn's Small Satellites , 2006 .

[31]  Wing Kam Liu,et al.  Nonlinear Finite Elements for Continua and Structures , 2000 .

[32]  R. A. Jacobson,et al.  The Orbits of the Inner Neptunian Satellites from Voyager, Earth-based, and Hubble Space Telescope Observations , 2004 .

[33]  J. Burns,et al.  Jupiter's ring-moon system , 2004 .

[34]  Thomas C. Duxbury,et al.  Phobos and Deimos control networks , 1989 .

[35]  Timothy Edward Dowling,et al.  Jupiter : the planet, satellites, and magnetosphere , 2004 .

[36]  G. M.,et al.  A Treatise on the Mathematical Theory of Elasticity , 1906, Nature.

[37]  D. Banfield,et al.  A dynamical history of the inner Neptunian satellites , 1991 .

[38]  M. Showalter,et al.  The Second Ring-Moon System of Uranus: Discovery and Dynamics , 2006, Science.

[39]  K. Holsapple Spinning rods, elliptical disks and solid ellipsoidal bodies: Elastic and plastic stresses and limit spins , 2008 .

[40]  Joseph A. Burns,et al.  Approximate Equilibrium Shapes for Spinning, Gravitating Rubble Asteroids , 2007 .

[41]  K. A. Holsapple,et al.  Tidal disruptions: A continuum theory for solid bodies , 2006 .

[42]  M. W. Evans,et al.  Astrometry and dynamics of Anthe (S/2007 S 4), a new satellite of Saturn , 2008 .

[43]  Voyager's Eleventh Discovery of a Satellite of Uranus and Photometry and the First Size Measurements of Nine Satellites , 2001 .

[44]  R. A. Jacobson,et al.  The Orbits of the Inner Uranian Satellites from Hubble Space Telescope and Voyager 2 Observations , 1998 .

[45]  C. Truesdell,et al.  The Classical Field Theories , 1960 .

[46]  Proposed Method for Modeling the Gravitational Interaction Between Finite Bodies , 2005 .

[47]  A. Dobrovolskis,et al.  Tidal disruption of solid bodies , 1987 .

[48]  C. Weitz,et al.  Small satellites of Uranus: Disk-integrated photometry and estimated radii , 1989 .