Diesel fuel processor for PEM fuel cells: Two possible alternatives (ATR versus SR)

Abstract There are large efforts in exploring the on-board reforming technologies, which would avoid the actual lack of hydrogen infrastructure and related safety issues. From this view point, the present work deals with the comparison between two different 10 kW e fuel processors (FP) systems for the production of hydrogen-rich fuel gas starting from diesel oil, based respectively on autothermal (ATR) and steam-reforming (SR) process and related CO clean-up technologies; the obtained hydrogen rich gas is fed to the PEMFC stack of an auxiliary power unit (APU). Based on a series of simulations with Matlab/Simulink, the two systems were compared in terms of FP and APU efficiency, hydrogen concentration fed to the FC, water balance and process scheme complexity. Notwithstanding a slightly higher process scheme complexity and a slightly more difficult water recovery, the FP based on the SR scheme, as compared to the ATR one, shows higher efficiency and larger hydrogen concentration for the stream fed to the PEMFC anode, which represent key issues for auxiliary power generation based on FCs as compared, e.g. to alternators.

[1]  D. W. Goodman,et al.  CO-free fuel processing for fuel cell applications , 2002 .

[2]  Adesoji A. Adesina,et al.  Kinetic studies of CH4 oxidation over Pt–NiO/δ-Al2O3 in a fluidised bed reactor , 1999 .

[3]  Stefano Cavallaro,et al.  Hydrogen production from methane through catalytic partial oxidation reactions , 2000 .

[4]  F. A. de Bruijn,et al.  The inclusion of Mo, Nb and Ta in Pt and PtRu carbon supported electrocatalysts in the quest for improved CO tolerant PEMFC anodes , 2002 .

[5]  Cailu Xu,et al.  Hydrogen storage by platelet-carbon fibers at room temperature , 2002 .

[6]  D. L Trimm,et al.  Catalysts for the control of coking during steam reforming , 1999 .

[7]  R. Sinkevitch,et al.  Carbon Monoxide Removal from Hydrogen-Rich Fuel Cell Feedstreams by Selective Catalytic Oxidation , 1993 .

[8]  Michael Krausa,et al.  Gasification of diesel oil in supercritical water for fuel cells , 2004 .

[9]  Zahra M. Tafreshi,et al.  Activities of δ-Al2O3-supported bimetallic Pt−NiO and Co−NiO catalysts for methane autoreforming: Oxidation studies , 1998 .

[10]  David L. Trimm,et al.  The design and testing of an autothermal reactor for the conversion of light hydrocarbons to hydrogen I. The kinetics of the catalytic oxidation of light hydrocarbons , 1996 .

[11]  Michael J. Binder,et al.  JP-8 Catalytic Cracking for Compact Fuel Processors , 2004 .

[12]  Rui Chen,et al.  A carbon monoxide PROX reactor for PEM fuel cell automotive application , 2001 .

[13]  J. Fierro,et al.  Partial oxidation of methanol over supported palladium catalysts , 1998 .

[14]  Roger Westerholm,et al.  A multivariate statistical analysis of chemical composition and physical characteristics of ten diesel fuels , 1995 .

[15]  Cailu Xu,et al.  Hydrogen adsorption in bundles of well-aligned carbon nanotubes at room temperature , 2001 .

[16]  D. Newsome.  The Water-Gas Shift Reaction , 1980 .

[17]  Vito Specchia,et al.  Development of A zeolites-supported noble-metal catalysts for CO preferential oxidation: H2 gas purification for fuel cell , 2004 .

[18]  M. Kinne,et al.  Kinetic study of selective CO oxidation in H2-rich gas on a Ru/γ-Al2O3 catalyst , 2002 .

[19]  Robert A. Hefner,et al.  Toward sustainable economic growth: The age of energy gases , 1995 .