Monitoring Functional Capability of Individuals with Lower Limb Amputations Using Mobile Phones

To be effective, a prescribed prosthetic device must match the functional requirements and capabilities of each patient. These capabilities are usually assessed by a clinician and reported by the Medicare K-level designation of mobility. However, it is not clear how the K-level designation objectively relates to the use of prostheses outside of a clinical environment. Here, we quantify participant activity using mobile phones and relate activity measured during real world activity to the assigned K-levels. We observe a correlation between K-level and the proportion of moderate to high activity over the course of a week. This relationship suggests that accelerometry-based technologies such as mobile phones can be used to evaluate real world activity for mobility assessment. Quantifying everyday activity promises to improve assessment of real world prosthesis use, leading to a better matching of prostheses to individuals and enabling better evaluations of future prosthetic devices.

[1]  Konrad Paul Kording,et al.  Measuring Generalization of Visuomotor Perturbations in Wrist Movements Using Mobile Phones , 2011, PloS one.

[2]  M. Bergner,et al.  The Sickness Impact Profile: Development and Final Revision of a Health Status Measure , 1981, Medical care.

[3]  Michael Goldfarb,et al.  Upslope Walking With a Powered Knee and Ankle Prosthesis: Initial Results With an Amputee Subject , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[4]  C. Gauthier-Gagnon,et al.  Tools to Measure Outcome of People with a Lower Limb Amputation: Update on the PPA and LCI , 2006 .

[5]  Norbert Gyorbíró,et al.  An Activity Recognition System For Mobile Phones , 2009, Mob. Networks Appl..

[6]  Katheryn J Allyn,et al.  Evaluation of function, performance, and preference as transfemoral amputees transition from mechanical to microprocessor control of the prosthetic knee. , 2007, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[7]  David Alan Boone,et al.  Use of the Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire (PEQ) , 2006 .

[8]  M. Nash,et al.  The amputee mobility predictor: an instrument to assess determinants of the lower-limb amputee's ability to ambulate. , 2002, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[9]  Konrad Paul Kording,et al.  Using Mobile Phones for Activity Recognition in Parkinson’s Patients , 2012, Front. Neur..

[10]  U S Nayak,et al.  Balance in elderly patients: the "get-up and go" test. , 1986, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[11]  L. Klenerman,et al.  The Jaipur foot. , 2008, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[12]  N. Dudek,et al.  Ambulation monitoring of transtibial amputation subjects with patient activity monitor versus pedometer. , 2008, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[13]  Merryn J Mathie,et al.  Accelerometry: providing an integrated, practical method for long-term, ambulatory monitoring of human movement , 2004, Physiological measurement.

[14]  Michael Goldfarb,et al.  Self-contained powered knee and ankle prosthesis: Initial evaluation on a transfemoral amputee , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics.

[15]  G D Reiber,et al.  Prosthesis evaluation questionnaire for persons with lower limb amputations: assessing prosthesis-related quality of life. , 1998, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[16]  A. Delitto,et al.  Selective criteria for successful long-term prosthetic use. , 1985, Physical therapy.

[17]  M. Pearcy,et al.  Categorization of Activities of Daily Living of Lower Limb Amputees During Short-Term Use of a Portable Kinetic Recording System: A Preliminary Study , 2011 .

[18]  Rickard Brånemark,et al.  Load on Osseointegrated Fixation of a Transfemoral Amputee During a Fall: Loading, Descent, Impact and Recovery Analysis , 2010, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[19]  F. Mahoney,et al.  FUNCTIONAL EVALUATION: THE BARTHEL INDEX. , 2018, Maryland state medical journal.

[20]  Laurent Alain Frossard,et al.  Load on Osseointegrated Fixation of a Transfemoral Amputee during a Fall: Determination of the Time and Duration of Descent , 2010, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[21]  John H. Evans,et al.  Development and Preliminary Testing of a Device for the Direct Measurement of Forces and Moments in the Prosthetic Limb of Transfemoral Amputees during Activities of Daily Living , 2003 .

[22]  M. Nash,et al.  The Amputee Mobility Predictor: An instrument to assess determinants of the lower-limb amputee's abi , 2002 .

[23]  Technical Note: Fabrication of a Dual-Axis Articulated Ankle-Foot Orthosis , 2006 .

[24]  Edward S. Neumann,et al.  Use of a Load Cell and Force-Moment Analysis to Examine Transtibial Prosthesis Foot Rollover Kinetics for Anterior-Posterior Alignment Perturbations , 2012 .

[25]  A. Tennant,et al.  The SIGAM mobility grades: a new population-specific measure for lower limb amputees , 2003, Disability and rehabilitation.

[26]  Laurent Frossard,et al.  Functional Outcome of Transfemoral Amputees Fitted With an Osseointegrated Fixation: Temporal Gait Characteristics , 2010 .

[27]  C. Sherbourne,et al.  The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) , 1992 .

[28]  Steven Gray,et al.  Magnitude and variability of loading on the osseointegrated implant of transfemoral amputees during walking. , 2008, Medical engineering & physics.

[29]  J. Stepien,et al.  Activity levels among lower-limb amputees: self-report versus step activity monitor. , 2007, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[30]  W. Zijlstra,et al.  Detection of walking periods and number of steps in older adults and patients with Parkinson's disease: accuracy of a pedometer and an accelerometry-based method. , 2008, Age and ageing.

[31]  Deborah Estrin,et al.  Ambulation: A Tool for Monitoring Mobility Patterns over Time Using Mobile Phones , 2009, 2009 International Conference on Computational Science and Engineering.

[32]  Kathryn Ziegler-Graham,et al.  Estimating the prevalence of limb loss in the United States: 2005 to 2050. , 2008, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[33]  S. Wood-Dauphinée,et al.  Assessment of global function: The Reintegration to Normal Living Index. , 1988, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[34]  Raymond Y. W. Lee,et al.  Detection of falls using accelerometers and mobile phone technology. , 2011, Age and ageing.

[35]  Laurent A. Frossard,et al.  Load-Relief of Walking Aids on Osseointegrated Fixation: Instrument for Evidence-Based Practice , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[36]  Andrew H Hansen,et al.  Obstacle course: users' maneuverability and movement efficiency when using Otto Bock C-Leg, Otto Bock 3R60, and CaTech SNS prosthetic knee joints. , 2012, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[37]  Graham Lawton,et al.  Get up and go , 2006 .

[38]  J E Sanders,et al.  A small and lightweight three-channel signal-conditioning unit for strain-gage transducers: a technical note. , 1995, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[39]  N. Ramstrand,et al.  Validation of a patient activity monitor to quantify ambulatory activity in an amputee population , 2007, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[40]  E. Roth,et al.  Cognitive dysfunction in spinal cord injury patients: sensitivity of the Functional Independence Measure subscales vs neuropsychologic assessment. , 1990, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[41]  Kerstin Hagberg,et al.  Questionnaire for Persons with a Transfemoral Amputation (Q-TFA): initial validity and reliability of a new outcome measure. , 2004, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[42]  Helen Scott,et al.  Lower Limb Prosthetic Outcome Measures: A Review of the Literature 1995 to 2005 , 2006 .

[43]  Laurent A. Frossard,et al.  Classification of Daily Activities of Transfemoral Amputees for Evidence-Based Practice , 2005 .

[44]  Konrad Paul Kording,et al.  Fall Classification by Machine Learning Using Mobile Phones , 2012, PloS one.

[45]  Hylton B Menz,et al.  Accelerometry: a technique for quantifying movement patterns during walking. , 2008, Gait & posture.

[46]  Kartheek Yalamanchili,et al.  Transducer-based comparisons of the prosthetic feet used by transtibial amputees for different walking activities: a pilot study , 2012, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[47]  A. Heinemann,et al.  Development and measurement properties of the Orthotics and Prosthetics Users’ Survey (OPUS): A comprehensive set of clinical outcome instruments , 2003, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[48]  R. Bestetti,et al.  Evaluation of the six-minute walk test in patients with chronic heart failure associated with Chagas' disease and systemic arterial hypertension. , 2010, Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical.

[49]  Juan-Luis Gorricho,et al.  Activity Recognition from Accelerometer Data on a Mobile Phone , 2009, IWANN.

[50]  Cynna Selvy HCFA Common Procedural Coding System (HCPCS) , 2015 .

[51]  P J Holliday,et al.  Clinical and laboratory measures of postural balance in an elderly population. , 1992, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[52]  A K Bourke,et al.  Evaluation of a threshold-based tri-axial accelerometer fall detection algorithm. , 2007, Gait & posture.

[53]  R Lee Kirby,et al.  Ambulation of people with lower-limb amputations: relationship between capacity and performance measures. , 2010, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[54]  Kerstin Hagberg,et al.  Kinetics of transfemoral amputees with osseointegrated fixation performing common activities of daily living. , 2007, Clinical biomechanics.

[55]  C. McHorney,et al.  The MOS 36‐Item Short‐Form Health Survey (SF‐36): II. Psychometric and Clinical Tests of Validity in Measuring Physical and Mental Health Constructs , 1993, Medical care.

[56]  C. Gauthier-Gagnon,et al.  Prosthetic profile of the amputee questionnaire: validity and reliability. , 1994, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.