Multi-objective sensor placement optimization for structural response estimation under spatially varying dynamic loading of bridges

Although a lot of different types of sensors are available in the market only a limited number of sensors can be installed on a structure. Proper placement of these sensors plays a vital role in effectively achieving the objectives of a monitoring system. Sensor placement becomes especially critical in the case of bridges where the applied loading keeps on changing its location. A sensor layout that provides good quality structural response estimates for a given applied loading may not yield acceptable results for a different loading arrangement. Further, usually different types of sensors are installed on a structure e.g. strain gauges and accelerometers. These sensors measure different physical quantities having different units and orders of magnitude thus cannot be easily incorporated in a sensor placement optimization (SPO) process. So, this research work proposes a multi-objective sensor placement optimization approach that can effectively deal with different types of sensor measurements and spatially varying loading such as in the case of bridges. The proposed method employs an augmented Kalman filter (AKF) for structural response estimation and a multi-objective genetic algorithm for SPO. The AKF can effectively estimate structural response using a few heterogeneous noisy measurements while incorporating the modeling error. The effectiveness of the proposed method is demonstrated using a numerical example of a 3D truss bridge structure. The results show that the proposed multi-objective optimization method yields a sensor arrangement that remains effective against spatially varying dynamic loading.

[1]  Billie F. Spencer,et al.  Multi-metric model-based structural health monitoring , 2014, Smart Structures.

[2]  Hongnan Li,et al.  Wireless sensor placement for structural monitoring using information-fusing firefly algorithm , 2017 .

[3]  David G. Vass,et al.  Proceedings of the Society of Photo-optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) , 1997 .

[4]  Hong Hao,et al.  Sensor Placement for Structural Damage Detection considering Measurement Uncertainties , 2013 .

[5]  Oral Buyukozturk,et al.  Identification of traffic-induced nodal excitations of truss bridges through heterogeneous data fusion , 2015 .

[6]  Hongki Jo,et al.  Model-Based Heterogeneous Data Fusion for Reliable Force Estimation in Dynamic Structures under Uncertainties , 2017, Sensors.

[7]  Ting-Hua Yi,et al.  Dual-type sensor placement optimization by fully utilizing structural modal information , 2019 .

[8]  Ning Hu,et al.  Damage assessment of structures using modal test data , 2001 .

[9]  Li Dongsheng,et al.  Optimal sensor placement in health monitoring of suspension bridge , 2012 .

[10]  Yi-Qing Ni,et al.  Technology developments in structural health monitoring of large-scale bridges , 2005 .

[11]  Hongki Jo,et al.  Impact force localization for civil infrastructure using augmented Kalman Filter optimization , 2019 .

[12]  Geert Lombaert,et al.  An augmented Kalman filter for force identification in structural dynamics , 2012 .

[13]  R. K. Ursem Multi-objective Optimization using Evolutionary Algorithms , 2009 .

[14]  Hongki Jo,et al.  Heterogeneous data fusion for impact force identification in truss structures , 2018, Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring.

[15]  Sebastiao Simões da Cunha,et al.  A multiobjective sensor placement optimization for SHM systems considering Fisher information matrix and mode shape interpolation , 2018, Engineering with Computers.

[16]  Hong-Nan Li,et al.  Methodology Developments in Sensor Placement for Health Monitoring of Civil Infrastructures , 2012, Int. J. Distributed Sens. Networks.

[17]  Guang-Dong Zhou,et al.  Sensor Placement Optimization in Structural Health Monitoring Using Cluster-In-Cluster Firefly Algorithm , 2014 .

[18]  Shamim N. Pakzad,et al.  Optimal Sensor Placement for Modal Identification of Bridge Systems Considering Number of Sensing Nodes , 2014 .

[19]  Christis Z. Chrysostomou,et al.  Multi-type, multi-sensor placement optimization for structural health monitoring of long span bridges , 2014 .

[20]  Costas Papadimitriou,et al.  Fatigue predictions in entire body of metallic structures from a limited number of vibration sensors using Kalman filtering , 2011 .

[21]  Hélio Lopes,et al.  ARTMe: a new array-based algorithm for Adaptive Refinement of Triangle Meshes , 2018, Engineering with Computers.

[22]  Chuanqiang Yu,et al.  Health monitoring sensor placement optimization based on initial sensor layout using improved partheno-genetic algorithm , 2020 .

[23]  Kalyanmoy Deb,et al.  Multiobjective optimization , 1997 .

[24]  Masoud Sanayei,et al.  Damage assessment of structures using static test data , 1991 .

[25]  Aftab A. Mufti,et al.  Structural Health Monitoring of Innovative Canadian Civil Engineering Structures , 2002 .

[26]  You-Lin Xu,et al.  Structural Health Monitoring of Long-Span Suspension Bridges , 2011 .

[27]  Michele Meo,et al.  On the optimal sensor placement techniques for a bridge structure , 2005 .

[28]  Songye Zhu,et al.  Multi-type sensor placement and response reconstruction for structural health monitoring of long-span suspension bridges , 2016 .

[29]  Ahmet E. Aktan,et al.  ISSUES IN INFRASTRUCTURE HEALTH MONITORING FOR MANAGEMENT , 2000 .