Communicated Knowledge: A Learning Foundation

Organizational learning capabilities are embedded in organizational communication systems and processes related to knowledge creation and articulation. The emergence of new organizational forms (such as horizontal organizations) in rapidly‐changing environments and hyper‐competitive markets underscores the need to better understand these foundational sources of learning. In fact, the reason horizontal organizations may find success is that their structure is intended to promote communications systems and processes which enhance a knowledge‐response sequence similar to a stimulus‐response sequence associated with learning. These systems permit managers to quickly gather information, respond with agility in making decisions, and continue to make ongoing adjustments. Firms which understand the need to build their communications capabilities may be characterized as meta‐learning organizations. Resource‐based theory suggests that communications systems and processes are thus sources of competitive advantage. Future empirical research on organizational learning may progress by evaluating specific measures of communication process as proxies for learning processes.

[1]  R. Grant The Resource-Based Theory of Competitive Advantage: Implications for Strategy Formulation , 1991 .

[2]  H. P. Sims,et al.  Top Management Team Demography and Process: The Role of Social Integration and Communication , 1994 .

[3]  Pier Paolo Saviotti,et al.  Information, variety and entropy in technoeconomic development☆ , 1988 .

[4]  J. March Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning , 1991, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[5]  K. Weick The Nontraditional Quality of Organizational Learning , 1991 .

[6]  Wheelwright Sc,et al.  The new product development map. , 1989 .

[7]  S. Mezias,et al.  The three faces of corporate renewal: institution, revolution, and evolution , 1993 .

[8]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  Politics of Strategic Decision Making in High-Velocity Environments: Toward a Midrange Theory , 1988 .

[9]  G. Huber Organizational Learning: The Contributing Processes and the Literatures , 1991 .

[10]  Craig C. Lundberg LEARNING IN AND BY ORGANIZATIONS: THREE CONCEPTUAL ISSUES , 1995 .

[11]  R. Daft,et al.  Toward a Model of Organizations as Interpretation Systems , 1984 .

[12]  B. Chakravarthy Adaptation: A Promising Metaphor for Strategic Management , 1982 .

[13]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology , 1992 .

[14]  P. Schoemaker,et al.  Strategic assets and organizational rent , 1993 .

[15]  Nancy M. Dixon,et al.  Organizational Learning: A Review of the Literature with Implications for HRD Professionals. , 1992 .

[16]  J. Barney Strategic Factor Markets: Expectations, Luck, and Business Strategy , 1986 .

[17]  Tom Stonier,et al.  Towards a new theory of information , 1986, J. Inf. Sci..

[18]  A. Wildavsky Information As An Organizational Problem , 1983 .

[19]  S. Lippman,et al.  Uncertain Imitability: An Analysis of Interfirm Differences in Efficiency under Competition , 1982 .

[20]  I. Nonaka A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation , 1994 .

[21]  Karel Cool,et al.  Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage , 1989 .

[22]  M. Tushman,et al.  Technological Discontinuities and Organizational Environments , 1986 .

[23]  C. Fiol Consensus, diversity, and learning in organizations. , 1994 .

[24]  Anne Sigismund Huff,et al.  Industry influences on strategy reformulation , 1982 .

[25]  Douglas Polley,et al.  Learning While Innovating , 1992 .

[26]  G. Hamel Competition for competence and interpartner learning within international strategic alliances , 1991 .

[27]  K. R. Conner A Historical Comparison of Resource-Based Theory and Five Schools of Thought Within Industrial Organization Economics: Do We Have a New Theory of the Firm? , 1991 .

[28]  F. Blackler KNOWLEDGE AND THE THEORY OF ORGANIZATIONS: ORGANIZATIONS AS ACTIVITY SYSTEMS AND THE REFRAMING OF MANAGEMENT* , 1993 .

[29]  ROLE OF DIFFUSION IN COLLECTIVE LEARNING , 1995 .

[30]  Roderick E. White,et al.  Top management teams and organizational renewal , 1989 .

[31]  Rhonda K. Reger,et al.  REFRAMING THE ORGANIZATION: WHY IMPLEMENTING TOTAL QUALITY IS EASIER SAID THAN DONE , 1994 .

[32]  Michael L. Tushman,et al.  R&D performance as a function of internal communication, project management, and the nature of the work , 1980, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[33]  M. Afzalur Rahim ISSUES IN ORGANIZATIONAL LEARNING , 1995 .

[34]  H. Simon,et al.  Selective perception: A note on the departmental identifications of executives. , 1958 .

[35]  Henry Mintzberg,et al.  Managerial Work: Analysis from Observation , 1971 .

[36]  C. Prahalad,et al.  The dominant logic: A new linkage between diversity and performance , 1986 .

[37]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .