Integration of visual and inertial cues in perceived heading of self-motion.

In the present study, we investigated whether the perception of heading of linear self-motion can be explained by Maximum Likelihood Integration (MLI) of visual and non-visual sensory cues. MLI predicts smaller variance for multisensory judgments compared to unisensory judgments. Nine participants were exposed to visual, inertial, or visual-inertial motion conditions in a moving base simulator, capable of accelerating along a horizontal linear track with variable heading. Visual random-dot motion stimuli were projected on a display with a 40° horizontal × 32° vertical field of view (FoV). All motion profiles consisted of a raised cosine bell in velocity. Stimulus heading was varied between 0 and 20°. After each stimulus, participants indicated whether perceived self-motion was straight-ahead or not. We fitted cumulative normal distribution functions to the data as a psychometric model and compared this model to a nested model in which the slope of the multisensory condition was subject to the MLI hypothesis. Based on likelihood ratio tests, the MLI model had to be rejected. It seems that the imprecise inertial estimate was weighed relatively more than the precise visual estimate, compared to the MLI predictions. Possibly, this can be attributed to low realism of the visual stimulus. The present results concur with other findings of overweighing of inertial cues in synthetic environments.

[1]  J. Gibson.  The perception of the visual world , 1951 .

[2]  R. Hetherington.  The Perception of the Visual World , 1952 .

[3]  L R Young,et al.  Interaction of optokinetic and vestibular stimuli in motion perception. , 1973, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[4]  Norbert Bischof,et al.  Optic-Vestibular Orientation to the Vertical , 1974 .

[5]  F. Guedry.  Psychophysics of Vestibular Sensation , 1974 .

[6]  A. J. Benson,et al.  Psychophysics, applied aspects and general interpretations , 1974 .

[7]  M. Sanders.  Handbook of Sensory Physiology , 1975 .

[8]  V Henn,et al.  Visual-vestibular interaction in motion perception and the generation of nystagmus. , 1980, Neurosciences Research Program bulletin.

[9]  Ian P. Howard,et al.  Human visual orientation , 1982 .

[10]  Daniel J. Hannon,et al.  Direction of self-motion is perceived from optical flow , 1988, Nature.

[11]  W. Warren,et al.  Perception of translational heading from optical flow. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[12]  T. Heckmann,et al.  Circular Vection as a Function of the Relative Sizes, Distances, and Positions of Two Competing Visual Displays , 1989, Perception.

[13]  W. Warren,et al.  The role of central and peripheral vision in perceiving the direction of self-motion , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[14]  M. Banks,et al.  Perceiving heading with different retinal regions and types of optic flow , 1993, Perception & psychophysics.

[15]  Ian P Howard,et al.  The Contribution of Motion, the Visual Frame, and Visual Polarity to Sensations of Body Tilt , 1994, Perception.

[16]  M. Ohmi.  Egocentric perception through interaction among many sensory systems. , 1996, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[17]  H. Mittelstaedt,et al.  Somatic graviception , 1996, Biological Psychology.

[18]  J. S. Long,et al.  Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables , 1997 .

[19]  I P Howard,et al.  Interactions within and between the spatial senses. , 1997, Journal of vestibular research : equilibrium & orientation.

[20]  I. Howard,et al.  Effect of Field Size, Head Motion, and Rotational Velocity on Roll Vection and Illusory Self-Tilt in a Tumbling Room , 1999, Perception.

[21]  L. Harris,et al.  Visual and non-visual cues in the perception of linear self motion , 2000, Experimental Brain Research.

[22]  Ruud Hosman,et al.  Evaluation of Perceived Motion During a Simulated Takeoff Run , 2001 .

[23]  M. Ernst,et al.  Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion , 2002, Nature.

[24]  Jelte E. Bos,et al.  Theoretical considerations on canal–otolith interaction and an observer model , 2002, Biological Cybernetics.

[25]  Christian Darlot,et al.  Using sensory weighting to model the influence of canal, otolith and visual cues on spatial orientation and eye movements , 2002, Biological Cybernetics.

[26]  Masao Ohmi,et al.  Heading judgments during active and passive self-motion , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[27]  Ulrik R Beierholm,et al.  Sound-induced flash illusion as an optimal percept , 2005, Neuroreport.

[28]  Mikko Sams,et al.  Maximum Likelihood Integration of rapid flashes and beeps , 2005, Neuroscience Letters.

[29]  Heinrich H. Bülthoff,et al.  A Bayesian model of the disambiguation of gravitoinertial force by visual cues , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.

[30]  W. Becker,et al.  Perception of angular displacement without landmarks: evidence for Bayesian fusion of vestibular, optokinetic, podokinesthetic, and cognitive information , 2006, Experimental Brain Research.

[31]  Jean-Pierre Bresciani,et al.  Vision and touch are automatically integrated for the perception of sequences of events. , 2006, Journal of vision.

[32]  Jean Laurens,et al.  Bayesian processing of vestibular information , 2007, Biological Cybernetics.

[33]  M. Ernst,et al.  Optimal integration of shape information from vision and touch , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.

[34]  Konrad Paul Kording,et al.  Causal Inference in Multisensory Perception , 2007, PloS one.

[35]  Kazuyuki Aihara,et al.  Bayesian Inference Explains Perception of Unity and Ventriloquism Aftereffect: Identification of Common Sources of Audiovisual Stimuli , 2007, Neural Computation.

[36]  Jean Laurens,et al.  Bayesian processing of vestibular information , 2007, Biological Cybernetics.

[37]  G. DeAngelis,et al.  A functional link between area MSTd and heading perception based on vestibular signals , 2007, Nature Neuroscience.

[38]  G. DeAngelis,et al.  Neural correlates of multisensory cue integration in macaque MSTd , 2008, Nature Neuroscience.

[39]  Heinrich H. Bülthoff,et al.  Circular, Linear, and Curvilinear Vection in a Large-screen Virtual Environment with Floor Projection , 2008, 2008 IEEE Virtual Reality Conference.

[40]  W P Medendorp,et al.  Fusion of visual and vestibular tilt cues in the perception of visual vertical. , 2009, Journal of neurophysiology.

[41]  Christopher R Fetsch,et al.  Dynamic Reweighting of Visual and Vestibular Cues during Self-Motion Perception , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[42]  Eric L. Groen,et al.  The DESDEMONA Motion Facility: Applications for Space Research , 2009 .

[43]  James T Todd,et al.  Are discrimination thresholds a valid measure of variance for judgments of slant from texture? , 2010, Journal of vision.