Identification of Terminal Connection and System Function for Sensitive Frequency Response Measurement on Transformers

Frequency response measurement on a transformer is a low voltage, off-line exercise. So, it virtually permits determination of any network/system function, by imposing any desired terminal condition for the nontested windings. The terminal conditions employed have significant influence on the achievable fault detection ability, and maximizing this ability should obviously be one of the main aims of frequency response measurements. Simply stated, this requirement translates to the ability to identify/measure as many natural frequencies as possible. However, there is a practical limitation that not all network/system functions can exhibit all natural frequencies. Hence, it is necessary to determine the most appropriate combination of terminal connection and system function for achieving this objective. Considering a two-winding transformer representation, system functions for different terminal conditions were computed. Depending on number of natural frequencies distinguishable in the amplitude frequency response of a system function, each measuring condition was ranked. Thus, it led to identification of the best configuration. Later, these findings were verified on an actual transformer. Performance of best configuration was compared with currently employed low-voltage impulse (LVI) test (used during short-circuit testing of transformers) and sweep frequency response measurement test conditions, and found to be better. In conclusion, it is believed that after adequate field verifications, the identified configuration can be declared as the preferred way of making frequency response measurements on transformers.

[1]  A.J. Vandermaar,et al.  Improved detection of power transformer winding movement by extending the FRA high frequency range , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery.

[2]  Syed Islam.  Detection of shorted turns and winding movements in large power transformers using frequency response analysis , 2000, 2000 IEEE Power Engineering Society Winter Meeting. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.00CH37077).

[3]  B. I. Gururaj,et al.  Influence of Phase Connection and Terminal Conditions on Natural Frequencies of Three-Phase Transformer Windings , 1968 .

[4]  A.J. Vandermaar,et al.  Transformer winding movement monitoring in service - key factors affecting FRA measurements , 2004, IEEE Electrical Insulation Magazine.

[5]  E.P. Dick,et al.  Transformer Diagnostic Testing by Frequuency Response Analysis , 1978, IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems.

[6]  E. A. Guillemin,et al.  Theory of Linear Physical Systems , 1963 .

[7]  Marek Florkowski,et al.  Detection of transformer winding deformations based on the transfer function: measurements and simulations , 2003 .

[8]  K. H. Sheshakamal.  Natural Frequencies and Transient Responses of Three-Phase Transformer Windings , 1988 .

[9]  Egon Brenner,et al.  Analysis of Electric Circuits , 1967 .

[10]  L. Satish,et al.  Structure of Transfer Function of Transformers with Special Reference to Interleaved Windings , 2002, IEEE Power Engineering Review.

[11]  K. Feser,et al.  Transfer Function Method to Diagnose Axial Displacement and Radial Deformation of Transformer Winding , 2002, IEEE Power Engineering Review.

[12]  S. Jayaram,et al.  Influence of secondary winding terminal conditions on impulse distribution in transformer windings , 1991, Conference Record of the 1991 IEEE Industry Applications Society Annual Meeting.

[13]  P. A. Abetti,et al.  Survey and Classification of Publisled Data on the Surge Performance of Transformers and Rotating Machines , 1958, Transactions of the American Institute of Electrical Engineers. Part III: Power Apparatus and Systems.

[14]  E. Guillemin.  Introductory circuit theory , 1953 .

[15]  Thomas S. Huang,et al.  Network theory : an introductory course , 1971 .