The value of air pollution co-benefits of climate policies: : Analysis with a global sector-trade CGE model called WorldScan

This paper uses the computable general equilibrium model WorldScan to analyze the co-benefits of reduced emissions of air pollutants as a by-product of climate policies. WorldScan covers the entire world in five regions (two in the EU) and simulates economic growth in a multi-sector neo-classical recursive dynamic framework. It includes emissions and abatement of greenhouse gases (CO2, N2O, CH4) and air pollutants (SO2, NOx, NH3, PM2.5). Abatement includes end-of-pipe controls removing pollutants without affecting the emission-producing activity itself. This paper shows that climate mitigation will significantly reduce the emissions of air pollutants. It estimates the economic value of the avoided air pollution damages by the costs of the air policy that generates the reductions of air pollutant emissions resulting from climate policies. Although the estimates of the co-benefits are uncertain, trade may have a significant impact on the avoided costs of air policies. This also has consequences on the value of the co-benefits of climate policies. The paper also shows that the regional value of co-benefits can be substantial, and may provide an incentive to reduce GHG emissions.

[1]  Stefan Boeters,et al.  Fossil Fuel Supply, Leakage and the Effectiveness of Border Measures in Climate Policy , 2012 .

[2]  Markus Amann,et al.  Exploring the ancillary benefits of the Kyoto Protocol for air pollution in Europe , 2006 .

[3]  Nebojsa Nakicenovic,et al.  Climate policies can help resolve energy security and air pollution challenges , 2013, Climatic Change.

[4]  G. Toth,et al.  Potentials and Costs for Greenhouse Gas Mitigation in Annex I Countries: Methodology , 2009 .

[5]  Kenichi Wada,et al.  Making or breaking climate targets: : The AMPERE study on staged accession scenarios for climate policy , 2015 .

[6]  Richard G. Richels,et al.  The Attached Material Is Posted on Regulation2point0.org with Permission. the Impact of Learning-by-doing on the Timing and Costs of Co 2 Abatement the Impact of Learning-by-doing on the Timing and Costs of Co 2 Abatement , 2022 .

[7]  Joris Koornneef,et al.  Supply of renewable energy sources and the cost of EU climate policy , 2011 .

[8]  Jens Borken-Kleefeld,et al.  GAINS Asia. Scenarios for cost-effective control of air pollution and greenhouse gases in China , 2008 .

[9]  Paul S. Armington.  A Theory of Demand for Products Distinguished by Place of Production (Une théorie de la demande de produits différenciés d'après leur origine) (Una teoría de la demanda de productos distinguiéndolos según el lugar de producción) , 1969 .

[10]  P. Purohit,et al.  Projections of SO2, NOx and carbonaceous aerosols emissions in Asia , 2009 .

[11]  D. P. van Vuuren,et al.  Energy systems and climate policy - Long-term scenarios for an uncertain future , 2007 .

[12]  J. Corfee-Morlot,et al.  Co-Benefits of Climate Change Mitigation Policies: Literature Review and New Results , 2009 .

[13]  Aie.  World Energy Outlook 2009 , 2000 .

[14]  Markus Amann,et al.  Regional and Global Emissions of Air Pollutants: Recent Trends and Future Scenarios , 2013 .

[15]  Johannes Bollen,et al.  Air pollution policy in Europe: Quantifying the interaction with greenhouse gases and climate change policies , 2014 .

[16]  Markus Amann,et al.  Co-benefits of post-2012 global climate mitigation policies , 2013, Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change.

[17]  Nathan Rive,et al.  Climate policy in Western Europe and avoided costs of air pollution control , 2010 .

[18]  Bert Saveyn,et al.  A comparability analysis of global burden sharing GHG reduction scenarios , 2013 .

[19]  Michael Hübler,et al.  Fair, optimal or detrimental? Environmental vs. strategic use of border carbon adjustment , 2012 .

[20]  Johannes Bollen,et al.  Local air pollution and global climate change. A combined cost-benefit analysis. , 2009 .

[21]  R. Dellink,et al.  Costs, Revenues, and Effectiveness of the Copenhagen Accord Emission Pledges for 2020 , 2010 .

[22]  Patrick Criqui,et al.  Post-Kyoto CO2 emission reduction : the soft landing scenario analysed with POLES and other world models , 2007 .

[23]  Pantelis Capros,et al.  Low-CO2 energy pathways and regional air pollution in Europe , 2001 .

[24]  Bob van der Zwaan,et al.  An integrated assessment of climate change, air pollution, and energy security policy. , 2010 .

[25]  K. Palmer,et al.  Ancillary benefits of reduced air pollution in the US from moderate greenhouse gas mitigation policies in the electricity sector , 2003 .