A model for notification systems evaluation—assessing user goals for multitasking activity

Addressing the need to tailor usability evaluation methods (UEMs) and promote effective reuse of HCI knowledge for computing activities undertaken in divided-attention situations, we present the foundations of a unifying model that can guide evaluation efforts for notification systems. Often implemented as ubiquitous systems or within a small portion of the traditional desktop, notification systems typically deliver information of interest in a parallel, multitasking approach, extraneous or supplemental to a user's attention priority. Such systems represent a difficult challenge to evaluate meaningfully. We introduce a design model of user goals based on blends of three critical parameters---interruption, reaction, and comprehension. Categorization possibilities form a logical, descriptive design space for notification systems, rooted in human information processing theory. This model allows conceptualization of distinct action models for at least eight classes of notification systems, which we describe and analyze with a human information processing model. System classification regions immediately suggest useful empirical and analytical evaluation metrics from related literature. We present a case study that demonstrates how these techniques can assist an evaluator in adapting traditional UEMs for notification and other multitasking systems. We explain why using the design model categorization scheme enabled us to generate evaluation results that are more relevant for the system redesign than the results of the original exploration done by the system's designers.

[1]  Mary Czerwinski,et al.  Notification, Disruption, and Memory: Effects of Messaging Interruptions on Memory and Performance , 2001, INTERACT.

[2]  Paul Green,et al.  THE 15-SECOND RULE FOR DRIVER INFORMATION SYSTEMS , 1999 .

[3]  Loren G. Terveen,et al.  Let's Stop Pushing the Envelope and Start Addressing It: A Reference Task Agenda for HCI , 2000, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[4]  J G Hollands,et al.  ENGINEERING PSYCHOLOGY AND HUMAN PERFORMANCE - THIRD EDITION , 2000 .

[5]  Mary Czerwinski,et al.  Introduction: design and evaluation of notification user interfaces , 2003, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[6]  Gregory D. Abowd,et al.  Charting past, present, and future research in ubiquitous computing , 2000, TCHI.

[7]  Mark Weiser,et al.  Designing Calm Technology , 2004 .

[8]  Philip J. Barnard,et al.  Representing Cognitive Activity in Complex Tasks , 1999, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[9]  Richard Reviewer-Granger Unified Theories of Cognition , 1991, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[10]  Hiroshi Ishii,et al.  Transparent layered user interfaces: an evaluation of a display design to enhance focused and divided attention , 1995, CHI '95.

[11]  ALISTAIR SUTCLIFFE,et al.  On the effective use and reuse of HCI knowledge , 2000, TCHI.

[12]  S. Monsell,et al.  Costs of a predictible switch between simple cognitive tasks. , 1995 .

[13]  A. Baddeley Exploring the Central Executive , 1996 .

[14]  David A. Duce,et al.  Systems, interactions, and macrotheory , 2000, TCHI.

[15]  Thomas B Sheridan,et al.  HUMAN FACTORS OF DRIVER-VEHICLE INTERACTION IN THE IVHS ENVIRONMENT. FINAL REPORT , 1991 .

[16]  H. E. Knee,et al.  In-vehicle signing functions and systems concepts , 1996 .

[17]  Thomas W. Calvert,et al.  Moving Icons: Detection and Distraction , 2001, INTERACT.

[18]  Eric Horvitz,et al.  Attention-Sensitive Alerting , 1999, UAI.

[19]  Eric Horvitz,et al.  Principles of mixed-initiative user interfaces , 1999, CHI '99.

[20]  John T. Stasko,et al.  Evaluating Animation in the Periphery as a Mechanism for Maintaining Awarness , 2001, INTERACT.

[21]  Blair MacIntyre,et al.  Support for multitasking and background awareness using interactive peripheral displays , 2001, UIST '01.

[22]  J. G. Hollands,et al.  Engineering Psychology and Human Performance , 1984 .

[23]  J. Juola,et al.  Visual search and reading of rapid serial presentations of letter strings, words, and text. , 1982 .

[24]  Johan Redström,et al.  Informative art: using amplified artworks as information displays , 2000, DARE '00.

[25]  Mary Beth Rosson,et al.  Usability Engineering: Scenario-based Development of Human-Computer Interaction , 2001 .

[26]  D. Scott McCrickard,et al.  Attuning notification design to user goals and attention costs , 2003, Commun. ACM.

[27]  Hiroshi Ishii,et al.  ambientROOM: integrating ambient media with architectural space , 1998, CHI Conference Summary.

[28]  Scott E. Hudson,et al.  The information percolator: ambient information display in a decorative object , 1999, UIST '99.

[29]  James T. Enns,et al.  Large Datasets at a Glance: Combining Textures and Colors in Scientific Visualization , 1999, IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph..

[30]  Wayne D. Gray,et al.  Damaged Merchandise? A Review of Experiments That Compare Usability Evaluation Methods , 1998, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[31]  Wendy A. Kellogg,et al.  "I'd be overwhelmed, but it's just one more thing to do": availability and interruption in research management , 2002, CHI.

[32]  Ronald A. Rensink,et al.  Preattentive recovery of three-dimensional orientation from line drawings. , 1991, Psychological review.

[33]  John L. Sibert,et al.  Interruption of people in human-computer interaction , 1998 .

[34]  Anoop Gupta,et al.  Sideshow: Providing Peripheral Awareness of Important Information , 2001 .

[35]  Paul Muter,et al.  Reading dynamically displayed text , 1989 .

[36]  James T. Enns,et al.  High-speed visual estimation using preattentive processing , 1996, TCHI.

[37]  Manuel A. Pérez-Quiñones,et al.  Evaluating two aspects of direct manipulation in advanced cockpits , 1992, CHI.

[38]  Kenneth I. Forster,et al.  Visual perception of rapidly presented word sequences of varying complexity , 1970 .

[39]  Mary Czerwinski,et al.  Scope: providing awareness of multiple notifications at a glance , 2002, AVI '02.

[40]  P A Kolers,et al.  Readability of Text Scrolled on Visual Display Terminals as a Function of Window Size , 1983, Human factors.

[41]  Mary Beth Rosson,et al.  Usability Engineering in Practice , 2002 .

[42]  C. Lebiere,et al.  The Atomic Components of Thought , 1998 .

[43]  Philip J. Barnard,et al.  Representing cognitive activity in complex tasks , 1999 .

[44]  Pattie Maes,et al.  Just-in-time information retrieval agents , 2000, IBM Syst. J..

[45]  D. Scott McCrickard Maintaining Information Awareness with Irwin , 1999 .

[46]  Lena Mamykina,et al.  Time Aura: interfaces for pacing , 2001, CHI.

[47]  William M. Newman,et al.  Better or just different? On the benefits of designing interactive systems in terms of critical parameters , 1997, DIS '97.

[48]  Chris North,et al.  Secondary Task Display Attributes - Optimizing Visualizations for Cognitive Task Suitability and Interference Avoidance , 2002, VisSym.

[49]  K. A. Ericsson,et al.  Long-term working memory. , 1995, Psychological review.

[50]  David E. Kieras,et al.  An Overview of the EPIC Architecture for Cognition and Performance With Application to Human-Computer Interaction , 1997, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[51]  Hiroshi Ishii,et al.  Water lamp and pinwheels: ambient projection of digital information into architectural space , 1998, CHI Conference Summary.

[52]  Saul Greenberg,et al.  Phidgets: easy development of physical interfaces through physical widgets , 2001, UIST '01.

[53]  Keith Duncan,et al.  Cognitive Engineering , 2017, Encyclopedia of GIS.

[54]  Judi E. See,et al.  Meta-analysis of the sensitivity decrement in vigilance. , 1995 .

[55]  J F Juola,et al.  Reading Moving Text on a CRT Screen , 1984, Human factors.

[56]  Daniel C. McFarlane,et al.  Comparison of Four Primary Methods for Coordinating the Interruption of People in Human-Computer Interaction , 2002, Hum. Comput. Interact..