Mortgage Lending in Boston: Interpreting HMDA Data

The results of this study indicate that minority applicants, on average, do have greater debt burdens, higher loan-to-value ratios, and weaker credit histories and they are less likely to buy single-family homes than white applicants, and that these disadvantages do account for a large portion of the difference in denial rates. Including the additional information on applicant and property characteristics reduces the disparity between minority and white denials from the originally reported ratio of 2.7 to 1 to roughly 1.6 to 1. But these factors do not wholly eliminate the disparity, since the adjusted ratio implies that even after controlling for financial, employment, and neighborhood characteristics, black and Hispanic mortgage applicants in the Boston metropolitan area are roughly 60 percent more likely to be turned down than whites. This discrepancy means that minority applicants with the same economic and property characteristics as white applicants would experience a denial rate of 17 percent rather than the actual white denial rate of 11 percent. Thus, in the end, a statistically significant gap remains, which is associated with race. ; The information gathered in this survey provides some insight into how this outcome emerges. Many observers believe that no rational lender would turn down a perfectly good application simply because the applicant is a member of a minority group. The results of this survey confirm this perception; minorities with unblemished credentials are almost (97 percent) certain of being approved. But the majority of borrowers - both white and minority - are not perfect, and lenders have considerable discretion over the extent to which they consider these imperfections as well as compensating factors.

[1]  Patricia E. Beeson,et al.  Cross-lender variation in home mortgage lending , 1992 .

[2]  Glenn B. Canner,et al.  Race, Default Risk and Mortgage Lending: A Study of the FHA and Conventional Loan Markets , 1991 .

[3]  S. Rosenthal,et al.  Credit rationing, race, and the mortgage market , 1991 .

[4]  Helen F. Ladd,et al.  Discrimination in mortgage lending , 1984 .

[5]  Helen F. Ladd,et al.  Discrimination in Mortgage Lending: A Study of Three Cities.@@@Discrimination in Mortgage Lending. , 1982 .

[6]  R. Avery,et al.  Mortgage Redlining: Some New Evidence , 1981 .

[7]  W. Greene ON THE ASYMPTOTIC BIAS OF THE ORDINARY LEAST SQUARES ESTIMATOR OF THE TOBIT MODEL , 1981 .

[8]  William G. Cochran,et al.  Some Effects of Errors of Measurement on Multiple Correlation , 1970 .

[9]  Geoffrey M. B. Tootell Defaults, denials, and discrimination in mortgage lending , 1993 .

[10]  Katharine L. Bradbury,et al.  Geographic patterns of mortgage lending in Boston, 1982-1987 , 1989 .

[11]  J. Yinger,et al.  Measuring racial discrimination with fair housing audits: caught in the Act. , 1986 .

[12]  Richard Startz,et al.  Private Discrimination and Social Intervention in Competitive Labor Markets , 1983 .

[13]  Glenn B. Canner Redlining: research and federal legislative response , 1982 .

[14]  James R. Barth,et al.  Financial Institution Regulations, Redlining and Mortgage Markets , 1979 .

[15]  D. Horsky,et al.  An empirical study of mortgage redlining , 1978 .

[16]  Lewis Mandell,et al.  Discrimination in Mortgage Lending , 1978 .

[17]  G. Galster A Bid-Rent Analysis of Housing Market Discrimination , 1977 .

[18]  E. Phelps The Statistical Theory of Racism and Sexism , 1972 .