Stability Assessment of Intracranial Aneurysms Using Machine Learning Based on Clinical and Morphological Features

Machine learning (ML) as a novel approach could help clinicians address the challenge of accurate stability assessment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms (IAs). We developed multiple ML models for IA stability assessment and compare their performances. We enrolled 1897 consecutive patients with unstable ( n  = 528) and stable ( n  = 1539) IAs. Thirteen patient-specific clinical features and eighteen aneurysm morphological features were extracted to generate support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF), and feed-forward artificial neural network (ANN) models. The discriminatory performances of the models were compared with statistical logistic regression (LR) model and the PHASES score in IA stability assessment. Based on the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and area under the curve (AUC) values for each model in the test set, the AUC values for RF, SVM, and ANN were 0.850 (95% CI 0.806–0.893), 0.858 (95 %CI 0.816–0.900), and 0.867 (95% CI 0.828–0.906), demonstrating good discriminatory ability. All ML models exhibited superior performance compared with the statistical LR and the PHASES score (the AUC values were 0.830 and 0.589, respectively; RF versus PHASES, P  < 0.001; RF versus LR, P  = 0.038). Important features contributing to the stability discrimination included three clinical features (location, sidewall/bifurcation type, and presence of symptoms) and three morphological features (undulation index, height-width ratio, and irregularity). These findings demonstrate the potential of ML to augment the clinical decision-making process for IA stability assessment, which may enable more optimal management for patients with IAs in the future.

[1]  R. Tubbs,et al.  PHASES score applied to a prospective cohort of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage patients , 2018, Journal of Clinical Neuroscience.

[2]  Joseph P Broderick,et al.  Unruptured intracranial aneurysms: epidemiology, natural history, management options, and familial screening , 2014, The Lancet Neurology.

[3]  H. Maslehaty,et al.  Evaluation of the risk of rupture of intracranial aneurysms in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage according to the PHASES score , 2018, Neurosurgical Review.

[4]  Youxiang Li,et al.  Prediction of Aneurysm Stability Using a Machine Learning Model Based on PyRadiomics-Derived Morphological Features. , 2019, Stroke.

[5]  J. Isaksen,et al.  Cerebral Aneurysm Morphology Before and After Rupture: Nationwide Case Series of 29 Aneurysms , 2017, Stroke.

[6]  B. Hoh,et al.  BOTTLENECK FACTOR AND HEIGHT‐WIDTH RATIO: ASSOCIATION WITH RUPTURED ANEURYSMS IN PATIENTS WITH MULTIPLE CEREBRAL ANEURYSMS , 2007, Neurosurgery.

[7]  J. Xiang,et al.  Morphologic and hemodynamic analysis of paraclinoid aneurysms: ruptured versus unruptured , 2013, Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery.

[8]  C. Prestigiacomo,et al.  Predicting aneurysm rupture probabilities through the application of a computed tomography angiography-derived binary logistic regression model. , 2009, Journal of neurosurgery.

[9]  A. Algra,et al.  Prevalence of unruptured intracranial aneurysms, with emphasis on sex, age, comorbidity, country, and time period: a systematic review and meta-analysis , 2011, The Lancet Neurology.

[10]  Jin Pyeong Jeon,et al.  Machine Learning Application for Rupture Risk Assessment in Small-Sized Intracranial Aneurysm , 2019, Journal of clinical medicine.

[11]  Johannes K Richter,et al.  Decision tree analysis in subarachnoid hemorrhage: prediction of outcome parameters during the course of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage using decision tree analysis. , 2018, Journal of neurosurgery.

[12]  J. Kaprio,et al.  Incidence of subarachnoid hemorrhage is decreasing together with decreasing smoking rates , 2016, Neurology.

[13]  Norlisah Ramli,et al.  Benefits of 3D rotational DSA compared with 2D DSA in the evaluation of intracranial aneurysm. , 2012, Academic radiology.

[14]  A. Ng,et al.  Deep Learning–Assisted Diagnosis of Cerebral Aneurysms Using the HeadXNet Model , 2019, JAMA network open.

[15]  J. Mocco,et al.  Unruptured Cerebral Aneurysms Do Not Shrink When They Rupture: Multicenter Collaborative Aneurysm Study Group , 2011, Neurosurgery.

[16]  E. Connolly,et al.  Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association , 2015, Stroke.

[17]  Timothy R. Smith,et al.  Natural and Artificial Intelligence in Neurosurgery: A Systematic Review , 2018, Neurosurgery.

[18]  J. Mocco,et al.  MORPHOLOGY PARAMETERS FOR INTRACRANIAL ANEURYSM RUPTURE RISK ASSESSMENT , 2008, Neurosurgery.

[19]  Bing Zhao,et al.  Prediction of rupture risk in anterior communicating artery aneurysms with a feed-forward artificial neural network , 2018, European Radiology.

[20]  Z. Obermeyer,et al.  Predicting the Future - Big Data, Machine Learning, and Clinical Medicine. , 2016, The New England journal of medicine.

[21]  Chang-Woo Ryu,et al.  Analysis of aneurysm rupture in relation to the geometric indices: aspect ratio, volume, and volume-to-neck ratio , 2011, Neuroradiology.

[22]  Jihoon G. Yoon,et al.  Machine Learning–Based Model for Prediction of Outcomes in Acute Stroke , 2019, Stroke.

[23]  M. L. Raghavan,et al.  Quantified aneurysm shape and rupture risk. , 2005, Journal of neurosurgery.

[24]  J. Mocco,et al.  Hemodynamic–Morphologic Discriminants for Intracranial Aneurysm Rupture , 2011, Stroke.

[25]  Prakhar Jaiswal,et al.  Outcome prediction of intracranial aneurysm treatment by flow diverters using machine learning. , 2018, Neurosurgical focus.

[26]  T. Hori,et al.  Is the Aspect Ratio a Reliable Index for Predicting the Rupture of a Saccular Aneurysm? , 2001, Neurosurgery.

[27]  A. Algra,et al.  Risk of Rupture of an Intracranial Aneurysm Based on Patient Characteristics: A Case–Control Study , 2013, Stroke.

[28]  Michael Y. Wang,et al.  Machine-Learning Models: The Future of Predictive Analytics in Neurosurgery. , 2018, Neurosurgery.

[29]  J. Caspers,et al.  Prediction of outcome after aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage using data from patient admission , 2018, European Radiology.

[30]  E. DeLong,et al.  Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. , 1988, Biometrics.

[31]  Toshihiro Ishibashi,et al.  Development of the PHASES score for prediction of risk of rupture of intracranial aneurysms: a pooled analysis of six prospective cohort studies , 2014, The Lancet Neurology.

[32]  S. Kuroda,et al.  Size Ratio Can Highly Predict Rupture Risk in Intracranial Small (<5 mm) Aneurysms , 2013, Stroke.

[33]  A. Ozanne,et al.  The PHASES score: to treat or not to treat? Retrospective evaluation of the risk of rupture of intracranial aneurysms in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. , 2020, Journal of neuroradiology = Journal de neuroradiologie.

[34]  D F Kallmes,et al.  Comparison of 2D Digital Subtraction Angiography and 3D Rotational Angiography in the Evaluation of Dome-to-Neck Ratio , 2009, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[35]  Ying Zhang,et al.  Clinical, morphological, and hemodynamic independent characteristic factors for rupture of posterior communicating artery aneurysms , 2015, Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery.