Design Space Reduction for Multi-Objective Optimization and Robust Design Optimization Problems

Modern engineering design often involves computation-intensive simulation processes and multiple objectives. Engineers prefer an efficient optimization method that can provide them insights into the problem, yield multiple good or optimal design solutions, and assist decision-making. This work proposed a rough-set based method that can systematically identify regions (or subspaces) from the original design space for multiple objectives. In the smaller regions, any design solution (point) very likely satisfies multiple design goals. Engineers can pick many design solutions from or continue to search in those regions. Robust design optimization (RDO) problems can be formulated as a biobjective optimization problem and thus in this work RDO is considered a special case of multi-objective optimization (MOO). Examples show that the regions can be efficiently identified. Pareto-optimal frontiers generated from the regions are identical with those generated from the original design space, which indicates that important design information can be captured by only these regions (subspaces). Advantages and limitations of the proposed method are discussed.

[1]  Margaret J. Robertson,et al.  Design and Analysis of Experiments , 2006, Handbook of statistics.

[2]  Jasbir S. Arora,et al.  Introduction to Optimum Design , 1988 .

[3]  Juhani Koski,et al.  Multicriteria Design Optimization , 1990 .

[4]  S. Krishnamurty,et al.  Trade-Offs in Robust Engineering Design , 1997, DAC 1997.

[5]  Raphael T. Haftka,et al.  Optimization and Experiments: A Survey , 1998 .

[6]  Andrew Gelsey,et al.  Using Modeling Knowledge to Guide Design Space Search , 1998, Artif. Intell..

[7]  Wei Chen,et al.  Quality utility : a Compromise Programming approach to robust design , 1999 .

[8]  Farrokh Mistree,et al.  Statistical Approximations for Multidisciplinary Design Optimization: The Problem of Size , 1999 .

[9]  S. B. Biggers,et al.  An Affordable Approach for Robust Design of Thick Laminated Composite Structure , 2000 .

[10]  Kemper Lewis,et al.  Tuning a Hybrid Optimization Algorithm by Determining the Modality of the Design Space , 2001 .

[11]  D. Mavris,et al.  An Exploration of a Pre-Screening Method for Tailoring Experimental Designs Around Infeasible Regions of Design Spaces , 2002 .

[12]  Dimitri N. Mavris,et al.  A Screening Method for Customizing Designs Around Non-Convergent Regions of Design Spaces , 2002 .

[13]  M. Sasena,et al.  Global optimization of problems with disconnected feasible regions via surrogate modeling , 2002 .

[14]  D. Kazmer,et al.  An extensive simplex method for mapping global feasibility , 2003 .

[15]  Songqing Shan,et al.  Introducing Rough Set for Design Space Exploration and Optimization , 2003, DAC 2003.

[16]  G. G. Wang,et al.  Adaptive Response Surface Method Using Inherited Latin Hypercube Design Points , 2003 .