Beyond Interests, Ideas, and Technology: An Institutional Approach to Communication and Information Policy

This article examines the theoretical assumptions generally used in communication and information policy studies, and suggests that more attention to the institutional determinants of public policies is needed. The first part discusses three alternative theoretical approaches: the interest-group approach, the ideological approach, and the technology-centered approach. The second part outlines the conceptual tools of the new institutionalism approach and discusses its application for the study of regime change in telecoms and media. The third part presents an abbreviated example of such application to the case of U.S. spectrum policies and the licensing of digital broadcasting. The conclusion suggests new directions for research aimed at broadening the set of social actors participating in the global governance of new technologies.

[1]  R. Kent Weaver,et al.  Do Institutions Matter?: Government Capabilities in the United States and Abroad , 1993 .

[2]  R. Hart,et al.  Politics, discourse, and American society : new agendas , 2001 .

[3]  P. Hall.  Governing the economy : the politics of state intervention in Britain and France , 1988 .

[4]  P. Hall,et al.  Governing the economy : the politics of state intervention in Britain and France , 1988 .

[5]  R. Kent Weaver,et al.  Do Institutions Matter , 1992 .

[6]  Gillian Paull.  Biases in the reporting of labour market dynamics , 2002 .

[7]  Y. Benkler.  Communications infrastructure regulation and the distribution of control over content , 1998 .

[8]  Cass R. Sunstein,et al.  Television and the Public Interest , 2000 .

[9]  M. Olson,et al.  The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. , 1973 .

[10]  Sven Steinmo,et al.  Structuring politics : historical institutionalism in comparative analysis , 1992 .

[11]  Johan P. Olsen,et al.  The New Institutionalism: Organizational Factors in Political Life , 1983, American Political Science Review.

[12]  Geoff Mulgan,et al.  Communication and Control: Networks and the New Economies of Communication , 1991 .

[13]  Girija Krishnaswamy,et al.  Socioeconomic Implications of Telecommunication Liberalization: India in the International Context , 1998, Inf. Soc..

[14]  G. Becker,et al.  A Theory of Competition Among Pressure Groups for Political Influence , 1983 .

[15]  Paul J. Quirk,et al.  The Politics Of Deregulation , 1985 .

[16]  R. Posner.  Theories of Economic Regulation , 1974 .

[17]  Lawrence D. Longley,et al.  The politics of broadcast regulation , 1978 .

[18]  Edgar A. Whitley,et al.  Ruling the Root: Internet Governance and the Taming of Cyberspace , 2004 .

[19]  Pablo T. Spiller,et al.  Regulations, Institutions, and Commitment: Contents , 1996 .

[20]  Dan Schiller.  Telematics and government , 1982 .

[21]  Monroe E. Price,et al.  Media and Sovereignty: The Global Information Revolution and Its Challenge to State Power , 2003 .

[22]  J. Zysman.  How Institutions Create Historically Rooted Trajectories of Growth , 1994 .

[23]  Mathew D. McCubbins,et al.  Structure and policy in Japan and the United States , 1996 .

[24]  N. Higham,et al.  Broadband regulation. The OFTEL Consultative Document: Beyond the telephone, the television and the PC , 1996 .

[25]  Arthur L. Stinchcombe,et al.  On the Virtues of the Old Institutionalism , 1997 .

[26]  A. Michael Froomkin.  Semi-Private International Rulemaking: Lessons Learned from the WIPO Domain Name Process , 2000 .

[27]  D. North.  Competing Technologies , Increasing Returns , and Lock-In by Historical Events , 1994 .

[28]  M. Olson,et al.  The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups , 1969 .

[29]  P. Gourevitch.  Politics in hard times : comparative responses to international economic crises , 1988 .

[30]  William H. Dutton,et al.  The Ecology of Games Shaping Telecommunications Policy , 1992 .

[31]  D. North.  Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance: Economic performance , 1990 .

[32]  Roger Silverstone,et al.  International Media Research: A Critical Survey , 1997 .

[33]  Stephen D. Krasner.  Sovereignty , 1988 .

[34]  T. Hazlett,et al.  Digital Television and the Quid Pro Quo , 2000, Business and Politics.

[35]  W. Diebold,et al.  Politics in Hard Times: Comparative Responses to International Economic Crises , 1987 .

[36]  V. Mosco.  Toward a Theory of the State and Telecommunications Policy. , 1988 .

[37]  Mira Sotirovic,et al.  A Virtuous Circle: Political Communications in Postindustrial Societies , 2001 .

[38]  Richard A. V. Diener,et al.  Technologies of freedom , 1987, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[39]  Gerald W. Brock.  Telecommunication Policy for the Information Age: From Monopoly to Competition , 1998 .

[40]  Hernan Galperin,et al.  New Television, Old Politics: The Transition to Digital TV in the United States and Britain , 2004 .

[41]  David G. Post,et al.  Law and Borders - the Rise of Law in Cyberspace , 1996, First Monday.

[42]  Structuring politics: The movement from Keynesianism to monetarism: Institutional analysis and British economic policy in the 1970s , 1992 .

[43]  G. Stigler.  The Theory of Economic Regulation , 2021, The Political Economy.

[44]  Byron T. Scott.  Media and Sovereignty: The Global Information Revolution and Its Challenge to State Power , 2005 .

[45]  M. Thatcher,et al.  The Politics of Telecommunications: National Institutions, Convergences, and Change in Britain and France , 2000 .

[46]  Graham Murdock,et al.  Common Markets: Corporate Ambitions and Communication Trends in the UK and Europe , 1999 .

[47]  P. T. Spiller,et al.  Regulations, Institutions, and Commitment: References , 1996 .

[48]  J. Ferejohn,et al.  The Constituency Service Basis of the Personal Vote for U.S. Representatives and British Members of Parliament , 1984, American Political Science Review.

[49]  Hernan Galperin,et al.  Can the US transition to digital TV be fixed? Some lessons from two European Union cases , 2002 .

[50]  Why Communications Policy Is Passing "Mass Communication" By: Political Economy as the Missing Link (Review and Criticism). , 1995 .

[51]  Robert B. Horwitz,et al.  The Irony of Regulatory Reform: The Deregulation of American Telecommunications , 1988 .

[52]  Johannes M. Bauer,et al.  Institutional arrangements and price rebalancing: empirical evidence from the United States and Europe , 2002, Inf. Econ. Policy.

[53]  Thomas Schwartz,et al.  Congressional Oversight Over-looked: Police Patrol versus Fire Alarms , 1984 .

[54]  Vincent Mosco,et al.  Myth-ing Links: Power and Community on the Information Highway , 1998, Inf. Soc..

[55]  S. Vogel,et al.  Freer Markets, More Rules: Regulatory Reform in Advanced Industrial Countries , 1996 .

[56]  Nicholas Garnham,et al.  Capitalism and communication : global culture and the economics of information , 2001 .