Interactivity in Society: Locating an Elusive Concept

Interactivity has been identified as a core concept of new media, yet despite nearly three decades of study and analysis, we scarcely know what interactivity is, let alone what it does, and have scant insight into the conditions in which interactive processes are likely to be consequential for members of a social system. This article attempts to address this deficiency by critiquing three self-defeating tendencies and an erroneous assumption of interactivity research, then proposes four basic propositions around which systematic knowledge regarding interactivity in society may be built. In the spirit of bridging mass and interpersonal processes, a model of interactivity is proposed to initiate discussion about the concept as a cross-level and multivalent phenomenon—one with both positive and negative consequences—and to spur more socially relevant research. For interactivity to succeed as a concept, it must have some meaningful social and psychological relevance beyond its technical status as a property of media systems or message exchanges.

[1]  W. Russell Neuman,et al.  The future of the mass audience , 1991 .

[2]  Gerald Grow,et al.  Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication , 1982 .

[3]  Sally J. McMillan Exploring Models of Interactivity from Multiple Research Traditions: Users, Documents, and Systems , 2002 .

[4]  Jens F. Jensen,et al.  Interactivity: Tracking a New Concept in Media and Communication Studies , 1998 .

[5]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Toward a “Critical Mass” Theory of Interactive Media , 1987 .

[6]  Jonathan Steuer,et al.  Defining virtual reality: dimensions determining telepresence , 1992 .

[7]  Joseph Turow,et al.  Breaking Up America: Advertisers and the New Media World , 1997 .

[8]  Thomas Shaw,et al.  The effects of computer mediated interactivity on idea generation: an experimental investigation , 1993, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[9]  Hernando Gonzalez,et al.  Interactivity and feedback in third World development campaigns , 1989 .

[10]  Jang-Sun Hwang,et al.  Measures of Perceived Interactivity: An Exploration of the Role of Direction of Communication, User Control, and Time in Shaping Perceptions of Interactivity , 2002 .

[11]  J. Knott The organization of behavior: A neuropsychological theory , 1951 .

[12]  A. Bandura Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. , 1977, Psychological review.

[13]  John P. Robinson,et al.  Social and Psychological Influences on Computer User Frustration. , 2003 .

[14]  Spiro Kiousis,et al.  Interactivity: a concept explication , 2002, New Media Soc..

[15]  R. Cabecinhas,et al.  International Association for Media and Communication Research , 2000 .

[16]  Sally J. McMillan,et al.  Defining Interactivity , 2000, New Media Soc..

[17]  Norah E. Dunbar,et al.  Testing the Interactivity Principle: Effects of Mediation, Propinquity, and Verbal and Nonverbal Modalities in Interpersonal Interaction , 2002 .

[18]  SHYAM SUNDAR,et al.  Explicating Web Site Interactivity , 2003, Commun. Res..

[19]  F. H. Adler Cybernetics, or Control and Communication in the Animal and the Machine. , 1949 .

[20]  Jeff Conklin,et al.  Hypertext: An Introduction and Survey , 1987, Computer.

[21]  Roy Rada,et al.  Interactive Media , 1995, Springer New York.

[22]  I. Ajzen Attitudes, Personality and Behavior , 1988 .

[23]  Suzanne K. Damarin,et al.  The second self: Computers and the human spirit , 1985 .

[24]  Jörg M. Haake,et al.  Hypermedia and cognition: designing for comprehension , 1995, CACM.

[25]  J. Newhagen,et al.  Nightly@nbc.com: Audience Scope and the Perception of Interactivity in Viewer Mail on the Internet. , 1995 .

[26]  J. V. Dijk The Network Society: Social Aspects of New Media , 2005 .

[27]  Tanjev Schultz,et al.  Interactive Options in Online Journalism: A Content Analysis of 100 U.S. Newspapers , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[28]  Espen Aarseth Cybertext: Perspectives on Ergodic Literature , 1997 .

[29]  G. E. Berrios,et al.  . New York: Cambridge , 2000 .

[30]  Johannes A.G.M.,et al.  Widening Information Gaps and Policies of Prevention. , 2000 .

[31]  C. Leuba Toward Some Integration of Learning Theories: The Concept of Optimal Stimulation , 1955 .

[32]  R. Rice,et al.  The New Media: Communication, Research, and Technology. , 1984 .

[33]  Yuping Liu,et al.  What is Interactivity and is it Always Such a Good Thing? Implications of Definition, Person, and Situation for the Influence of Interactivity on Advertising Effectiveness , 2002 .

[34]  Annie Lang,et al.  Formal Features of Cyberspace: Relationships between Web Page Complexity and Site Traffic , 1999, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[35]  J. Beniger Personalization of Mass Media and the Growth of Pseudo-Community , 1987 .

[36]  Dan Ariely,et al.  Controlling the Information Flow: Effects on Consumers' Decision Making and Preferences , 2000 .

[37]  Brian L. Massey,et al.  Interactivity, Online Journalism, and English-Language Web Newspapers in Asia , 1999 .

[38]  Harry Gottlieb The Jack Principles of the Interactive Conversation Interface , 2002 .

[39]  Jennifer Lawrence,et al.  Communication in the Age of Virtual Reality. , 1997 .

[40]  A. Portes Social Capital: Its Origins and Applications in Modern Sociology , 1998 .

[41]  J. Burgoon,et al.  Interactivity in human–computer interaction: a study of credibility, understanding, and influence , 2000 .

[42]  J. V. Dijk,et al.  Widening Information Gaps and Policies of Prevention , 2000 .

[43]  Peter Vorderer,et al.  Does Entertainment Suffer From Interactivity? The Impact of Watching an Interactive TV Movie on Viewers' Experience of Entertainment , 2001 .

[44]  Clifford Nass,et al.  The media equation - how people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places , 1996 .

[45]  Erik P. Bucy The Interactivity Paradox: Closer to the News but Confused , 2003 .

[46]  C. Nass,et al.  Conceptualizing Sources in Online News , 2001 .

[47]  M. McLaughlin,et al.  Network and Netplay: virtual groups on the Internet , 1998 .

[48]  Pekka Isotalus,et al.  Television Performance as Interaction , 1998 .

[49]  Dennis L. Hoffman,et al.  Marketing in Hypermedia Computer-Mediated Environments : Conceptual Foundations 1 ) , 1998 .

[50]  P. Kidwell,et al.  The trouble with computers: Usefulness, usability and productivity , 1996, IEEE Annals of the History of Computing.

[51]  B. Calder,et al.  New media interactive advertising vs. traditional advertising , 1998 .

[52]  Celia Pearce,et al.  The Interactive Book: A Guide to the Interactive Revolution , 1997 .

[53]  Brenda Laurel,et al.  Computers as theatre , 1991 .

[54]  Rudy Bretz,et al.  Media for Interactive Communication , 1983 .

[55]  P. J. Tichenor,et al.  MASS MEDIA FLOW AND DIFFERENTIAL GROWTH IN KNOWLEDGE , 1970 .

[56]  Jerome T. Durlak,et al.  A Typology for Interactive Med , 1987 .

[57]  Thomas K. Landauer,et al.  Trouble with Computers: Usefulness, Usability, and Productivity , 1996 .

[58]  Robert D. Putnam,et al.  Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community , 2000, CSCW '00.

[59]  A. Bandura Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. , 1977, Psychology Review.

[60]  P. Reynolds A Primer in Theory Construction , 1971 .

[61]  C. Heeter Interactivity in the Context of Designed Experiences , 2000 .

[62]  John E. Newhagen,et al.  The emotional appropriateness heuristic: processing televised presidential reactions to the news , 1999 .

[63]  Erik P. Bucy,et al.  Media Participation , 2001, New Media Soc..

[64]  Jennifer Stromer-Galley On-Line Interaction and Why Candidates Avoid It , 2000 .

[65]  W. F. Pollard,et al.  The Penguin dictionary of information technology and computer science , 1994 .

[66]  Fay Sudweeks,et al.  Interactivity on the Nets , 1998 .

[67]  John E. Newhagen,et al.  The micro‐ and macrodrama of politics on television: Effects of media format on candidate evaluations , 1999 .

[68]  Brenda K. Laurel,et al.  Interface as Mimesis , 1986 .

[69]  Richard Reviewer-Granger Unified Theories of Cognition , 1991, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[70]  S. Sundar,et al.  Multimedia Effects on Processing and Perception of Online News: A Study of Picture, Audio, and Video Downloads , 2000 .

[71]  Robert P. Hawkins,et al.  Advancing communication science : merging mass and interpersonal processes , 1988 .

[72]  Alphonse Chapanis,et al.  Interactive human communication , 1975 .