Truthful Auction Mechanism for Heterogeneous Spectrum Allocation in Wireless Networks

Secondary spectrum auction is widely applied in wireless networks for mitigating the spectrum scarcity. In a realistic spectrum trading market, the requests from secondary users often specify the usage of a fixed spectrum frequency band in a certain geographical region and require a duration time in a fixed available time interval. Considering the selfish behaviors of secondary users, it is imperative to design a truthful auction which matches the available spectrums and requests of secondary users optimally. Unfortunately, existing designs either do not consider spectrum heterogeneity or ignore the differences of required time among secondary users. In this paper, we address this problem by investigating how to use auction mechanisms to allocate and price spectrum resources so that the social efficiency can be maximized. We begin by classifying the spectrums and requests from secondary users into different local markets which ensures there is no interference between local markets, and then we can focus on the auction in a single local market. We first design an optimal auction based on the Vickrey-Clarke-Groves (VCG) mechanism to maximize the social efficiency while enforcing truthfulness. To reduce the computational complexity, we further propose a truthful sub-optimal auction with polynomial time complexity, which yields an approximation factor 6+4\surd2. Our extensive simulation results using real spectrum availability data show that the social efficiency ratio of the sub-optimal auction is always above 70% compared with the optimal auction.

[1]  Saswati Sarkar,et al.  Spectrum Auction Framework for Access Allocation in Cognitive Radio Networks , 2010, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking.

[2]  P. Klemperer What Really Matters in Auction Design , 2001 .

[3]  Elias Aravantinos,et al.  A new pricing model for next generation spectrum access , 2005, TAPAS '06.

[4]  Shaojie Tang,et al.  Efficient and Strategyproof Spectrum Allocations in Multichannel Wireless Networks , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Computers.

[5]  XiaoHua Xu,et al.  TODA: Truthful Online Double Auction for Spectrum Allocation in Wireless Networks , 2010, 2010 IEEE Symposium on New Frontiers in Dynamic Spectrum (DySPAN).

[6]  William Vickrey,et al.  Counterspeculation, Auctions, And Competitive Sealed Tenders , 1961 .

[7]  Fan Wu,et al.  SMALL: A Strategy-proof Mechanism for radio spectrum allocation , 2011, 2011 Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM.

[8]  Bo Li,et al.  TAHES: Truthful double Auction for Heterogeneous Spectrums , 2012, 2012 Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM.

[9]  Haitao Zheng,et al.  A General Framework for Wireless Spectrum Auctions , 2007, 2007 2nd IEEE International Symposium on New Frontiers in Dynamic Spectrum Access Networks.

[10]  Baochun Li,et al.  A Secondary Market for Spectrum , 2010, 2010 Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM.

[11]  Kevin C. Almeroth,et al.  To preempt or not: Tackling bid and time-based cheating in online spectrum auctions , 2011, 2011 Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM.

[12]  Hanna Bogucka,et al.  Non-identical objects auction for spectrum sharing in TV white spaces — The perspective of service providers as secondary users , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Symposium on Dynamic Spectrum Access Networks (DySPAN).

[13]  Sudipto Guha,et al.  Approximating the Throughput of Multiple Machines in Real-Time Scheduling , 2002, SIAM J. Comput..

[14]  Xia Zhou,et al.  TRUST: A General Framework for Truthful Double Spectrum Auctions , 2009, IEEE INFOCOM 2009.

[15]  Moshe Babaioff,et al.  Concurrent auctions across the supply chain , 2001, EC '01.

[16]  K. J. Ray Liu,et al.  Multi-Stage Pricing Game for Collusion-Resistant Dynamic Spectrum Allocation , 2008, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[17]  He Huang,et al.  Truthful Multi-unit Double Auction for Spectrum Allocation in Wireless Communications , 2012, WASA.

[18]  Xiang-Yang Li,et al.  TOFU: Semi-Truthful Online Frequency Allocation Mechanism for Wireless Networks , 2011, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking.

[19]  Zongpeng Li,et al.  Strategyproof auctions for balancing social welfare and fairness in secondary spectrum markets , 2011, 2011 Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM.

[20]  R. McAfee,et al.  A dominant strategy double auction , 1992 .

[21]  Mingyan Liu,et al.  Revenue generation for truthful spectrum auction in dynamic spectrum access , 2009, MobiHoc '09.

[22]  Tim Roughgarden,et al.  Algorithmic Game Theory , 2007 .

[23]  Mahmoud Al-Ayyoub,et al.  Truthful spectrum auctions with approximate revenue , 2011, 2011 Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM.

[24]  Saswati Sarkar,et al.  Spectrum Auction Framework for Access Allocation in Cognitive Radio Networks , 2010, IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw..

[25]  David C. Parkes,et al.  Enabling Spectrum Sharing in Secondary Market Auctions , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing.

[26]  Xiang-Yang Li,et al.  SALSA: Strategyproof Online Spectrum Admissions for Wireless Networks , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Computers.

[27]  Baochun Li,et al.  District: Embracing local markets in truthful spectrum double auctions , 2011, 2011 8th Annual IEEE Communications Society Conference on Sensor, Mesh and Ad Hoc Communications and Networks.

[28]  Xia Zhou,et al.  eBay in the Sky: strategy-proof wireless spectrum auctions , 2008, MobiCom '08.

[29]  Mingyan Liu,et al.  Mining Spectrum Usage Data: A Large-Scale Spectrum Measurement Study , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing.