Electrocardiographically gated multi-detector row CT for assessment of valvular morphology and calcification in aortic stenosis.

PURPOSE To evaluate the applicability and image quality of nonenhanced and contrast material-enhanced multi-detector row computed tomography (CT) combined with retrospective electrocardiographic (ECG) gating for visualization of the aortic valve, determination of aortic valve morphology and diameter of the aortic valve annulus, and assessment of the degree of valvular calcification in patients with aortic valve stenosis, as compared with results of surgery and echocardiography. MATERIALS AND METHODS Prior to surgical valve replacement, 25 patients with aortic valve stenosis and sinus rhythm underwent nonenhanced (n = 15) and contrast-enhanced (n = 25) retrospectively ECG-gated multi-detector row CT. Two readers working in consensus evaluated image quality and assessed valvular morphology and the degree of valvular calcification. In addition, the diameter of the aortic valve annulus was measured. Results were compared with surgical and echocardiographic findings by using the paired sign test, kappa statistics, and the method of Bland and Altman. RESULTS The aortic valve could be visualized nearly free of motion artifacts on all multi-detector row CT images. Image quality and diagnostic confidence for classification of aortic valve morphology were significantly superior on contrast-enhanced rather than nonenhanced images (P =.004 and P =.006, respectively). Nonenhanced and contrast-enhanced CT showed good agreement with surgical findings with regard to quantification of the degree of aortic valve calcification (kappa = 0.77 and kappa = 0.74, respectively). Measurement of the diameter of the aortic valve annulus was more reliable on contrast-enhanced images. CONCLUSION Contrast-enhanced retrospectively ECG-gated multi-detector row CT allows determination of aortic valve morphology, measurement of the diameter of the aortic valve annulus, and assessment of the degree of aortic valve calcification in patients with aortic stenosis.

[1]  M. Schemper,et al.  Predictors of outcome in severe, asymptomatic aortic stenosis. , 2000, The New England journal of medicine.

[2]  Matthijs Oudkerk,et al.  Coronary angiography with multi-slice computed tomography , 2001, The Lancet.

[3]  C. Mullany.  Aortic valve surgery in the elderly. , 2000, Cardiology in review.

[4]  Werner Moshage,et al.  Noninvasive coronary angiography by retrospectively ECG-gated multislice spiral CT. , 2000 .

[5]  B. Schmidt,et al.  A PC program for estimating organ dose and effective dose values in computed tomography , 1999, European Radiology.

[6]  D. Behrendt,et al.  Should a bicuspid aortic valve be replaced in the presence of subvalvar or supravalvar aortic stenosis? , 1998, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[7]  M. Reiser,et al.  Cardiac imaging by means of electrocardiographically gated multisection spiral CT: initial experience. , 2000, Radiology.

[8]  D. Altman,et al.  STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT , 1986, The Lancet.

[9]  L. Stangeland,et al.  Limitations in assessing the severity of aortic stenosis by Doppler gradients. , 1988, British heart journal.

[10]  A. Cordell,et al.  Aortic root replacement with the freestyle stentless porcine aortic root bioprosthesis. , 1999, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[11]  J. Lodder,et al.  Cardiac valve calcification: characteristics of patients with calcification of the mitral annulus or aortic valve , 1997, Heart.

[12]  A Crispin,et al.  Coronary artery calcium measurement: agreement of multirow detector and electron beam CT. , 2001, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[13]  M F Reiser,et al.  ECG-gated reconstructed multi-detector row CT coronary angiography: effect of varying trigger delay on image quality. , 2001, Radiology.

[14]  A Stargardt,et al.  Individually Adapted Examination Protocols for Reduction of Radiation Exposure in Chest CT , 2001, Investigative radiology.

[15]  V. Maranhao,et al.  Preliminary experience in the use of ultrafast computed tomography to diagnose aortic valve stenosis. , 1988, American heart journal.

[16]  F. Loop,et al.  Aortic valve replacement for octogenarians: are small valves bad? , 1998, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[17]  B. Gersh,et al.  Association of aortic-valve sclerosis with cardiovascular mortality and morbidity in the elderly. , 1999 .

[18]  Werner Moshage,et al.  Detection of Coronary Artery Stenoses by Contrast-Enhanced, Retrospectively Electrocardiographically-Gated, Multislice Spiral Computed Tomography , 2001, Circulation.

[19]  C. Otto.  Aortic stenosis--listen to the patient, look at the valve. , 2000, The New England journal of medicine.

[20]  A. Mazzucco,et al.  Risk factors for coronary complications after stentless aortic root replacement. , 1999, Seminars in thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[21]  S. Brener,et al.  Factors leading to progression of valvular aortic stenosis. , 1999, The American journal of cardiology.

[22]  C Georg,et al.  Noninvasive detection and evaluation of atherosclerotic coronary plaques with multislice computed tomography. , 2001, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[23]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[24]  L. Cohn,et al.  Impact of small prosthetic valve size on operative mortality in elderly patients after aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis: does gender matter? , 1999, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[25]  V. Fuster,et al.  Coronary artery calcification: pathophysiology, epidemiology, imaging methods, and clinical implications. A statement for health professionals from the American Heart Association. Writing Group. , 1996, Circulation.

[26]  E. Mohler,et al.  Electron beam computed tomography for the quantification of aortic valvular calcification. , 2001, The Journal of heart valve disease.

[27]  A. Bolger,et al.  Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) in the evaluation of infective endocarditis. , 2000, Cardiology clinics.

[28]  C. Higgins,et al.  Coronary sinus flow measurement by means of velocity-encoded cine MR imaging: validation by using flow probes in dogs. , 2000, Radiology.

[29]  G D Rubin,et al.  Optimization of thoracic spiral CT: effects of iodinated contrast medium concentration. , 1996, Radiology.