Developing a Firm's Absorptive Capacity with Strategic Orientation

Absorptive capacity confers an ability to recognize the value of new information, assimilate it and apply it to commercial ends. It is well believed that the stronger absorptive capacity means the greater competitive advantage. However, this perception of firms’ knowledge transferring seems to misunderstand real learning due to three characteristics of absorptive capacity: path dependence, relativity, and expensive cost. In contrast, this paper shows that, given that absorptive capacity is highly path dependence, relative, and expensive to develop and maintain, it is necessary for firms to manage this scarce resource under their long-term strategy orientation aiming at continuing competence. From this perspective, three characteristics of absorptive capacity are analyzed in depth. Then, on the basis of a literature review of strategic orientation, the interaction between strategic orientation and absorptive capacity is discussed. Proposition about the effect of both strategic orientation and absorptive capacity on each other are given at the same time. Furthermore, the author builds up a two dimensional organizational learning framework that mixes the firm’s strategy orientation and absorptive capacity to explore the source of the firm’s competitive advantages. In this framework, only firms that combine explicit strategy and strong absorptive capacity will earn high learning performance and establish ultimate competitive advantages. Overall, the arguments made in this paper depict a complete picture of the relationship between absorptive capacity and firms’ strategic orientation, thus push forward our existing understanding of organization learning. It is an attempt to establish the conceptual foundation of strategic design of absorptive capacity for firms.

[1]  S. Albers,et al.  Crisis Construction and Organizational Learning: Capability Building in Catching-Up at Hyundai Motor , 1998 .

[2]  R. Grant Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm,” Strategic Management Journal (17), pp. , 1996 .

[3]  Peter J. Lane,et al.  Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning , 1998 .

[4]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge and the Speed of the Transfer and Imitation of Organizational Capabilities: An Empirical Test , 1995 .

[5]  I. Cockburn,et al.  Measuring competence?: exploring firm effects in pharmaceutical research , 1994 .

[6]  A. McAuley The Perceived Usefulness of Export Information Sources , 1993 .

[7]  C. Hill,et al.  A longitudinal study of the cause and consequences of changes in diversification in the U.S. pharmaceutical industry 1977–1986 , 1991 .

[8]  Raymond J. Bandlow Theories of Learning, 4th Edition. By Ernest R. Hilgard and Gordon H. Bower. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1975 , 1976 .

[9]  R. Grant On 'Dominant Logic', Relatedness and the Link between Diversity and Performance , 1988 .

[10]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[11]  Henk W. Volberda,et al.  Co-evolution of Firm Absorptive Capacity and Knowledge Environment: Organizational Forms and Combinative Capabilities , 1999 .

[12]  Stefan Mueller,et al.  International Orientation as a Precondition for Export Success , 1990 .

[13]  N. Foss Knowledge-Based Approaches to the Theory of the Firm: Some Critical Comments , 1996 .

[14]  Bernard J. Jaworski,et al.  Market orientation: Antecedents and consequences , 1993 .

[15]  Nick Oliver,et al.  ADOPTING JAPANESE-STYLE MANUFACTURING METHODS: A TALE OF TWO (UK) FACTORIES* , 1990 .

[16]  A. Rocha,et al.  Aggressive and Passive Exporters: A Study in the Brazilian Furniture Industry , 1990 .

[17]  S. Parker,et al.  "THAT'S NOT MY JOB": DEVELOPING FLEXIBLE EMPLOYEE WORK ORIENTATIONS , 1997 .

[18]  S. Finkelstein,et al.  Effects of strategic orientation and environmental change on senior management reward systems , 1992 .

[19]  Rohit Deshpandé,et al.  Understanding market orientation : a prospectively designed meta-analysis of three market orientation scales : working paper , 1996 .

[20]  Michael A. Hitt,et al.  Managerial Incentives and Investment in R&D in Large Multiproduct Firms , 1993 .

[21]  R. Mayntz Socialist Academies of Sciences: The Enforced Orientation of Basic Research at User Needs , 1998 .

[22]  R. Kilmann Producing Useful Knowledge for Organizations , 1994 .

[23]  John C. Narver,et al.  The Effect of a Market Orientation on Business Profitability , 1990 .

[24]  Paul M. B. Vitányi,et al.  Theories of learning , 2007 .

[25]  E. Muller,et al.  Opportunity costs and entrepreneurial activity , 1995 .

[26]  H. Gatignon,et al.  Strategic Orientation of the Firm and New Product Performance , 1997 .

[27]  E. Hilgard,et al.  Theories of Learning , 1981 .

[28]  George S. Day,et al.  Assessing Advantage: A Framework for Diagnosing Competitive Superiority , 1988 .

[29]  W. Estes Learning theory and mental development , 1970 .

[30]  J. Spender,et al.  BUSINESS POLICY AND STRATEGY: AN OCCASION FOR DESPAIR, A RETREAT TO DISCIPLINARY SPECIALIZATION, OR FOR NEW EXCITEMENT? , 1992 .

[31]  Gregory B. Merrill,et al.  The effect of compensation program and structure on sbu competitive strategy: A study of technology‐intensive firms , 1991 .

[32]  Linsu Kim,et al.  Absorptive Capacity and Industrial Growth: A Conceptual Framework and Korea’s Experience , 1995 .

[33]  C. P. Goodman,et al.  The Tacit Dimension , 2003 .

[34]  J. Barney Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[35]  Wesley M. Cohen,et al.  Empirical studies of innovation and market structure , 1989 .

[36]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology , 1992 .