A novel variable stiffness actuator: Minimizing the energy requirements for the stiffness regulation

The design of robots required to work in the close vicinity or physically interact with humans such as humanoids machines, rehabilitation or human performance augmentation systems should not follow the traditional design rule ‘stiffer is better’. Safety is a particularly vital concern in these systems and to maximize it a different design approach should be used. The role of compliance in improving specific suspects of the robotic system, including safety and energy efficiency, has been studied and validated in many works. This work presents the design and realization of a new variable compliance actuator for robots physically interacting with humans, e.g. prosthesis devices and exoskeleton augmentation systems. The actuator can independently control the equilibrium position and stiffness using two motors. The main novelty of the proposed variable stiffness actuator is that the stiffness regulation is achieved not through the pretension of the elastic elements which needs the stiffness tuning actuator to act against the forces generated by the springs but by mechanically adjusting the fixation of the spring elements. As a result the stiffness actuator does not need to act against the spring forces reducing the energy required for the stiffness adjustment to minimal.

[1]  Giorgio Grioli,et al.  VSA-II: a novel prototype of variable stiffness actuator for safe and performing robots interacting with humans , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[2]  Thomas G. Sugar A novel selective compliant actuator , 2002 .

[3]  Joel E. Chestnutt,et al.  The Actuator With Mechanically Adjustable Series Compliance , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[4]  Antonio Bicchi,et al.  Variable Stiffness Actuators for Fast and Safe Motion Control , 2003, ISRR.

[5]  Gabriel Abba,et al.  Energy-Minimized Gait for a Biped Robot , 1995, AMS.

[6]  Matthew D. Berkemeier,et al.  Design of a robot leg with elastic energy storage, comparison to biology, and preliminary experimental results , 1996, Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[7]  Nikolaos G. Tsagarakis,et al.  MACCEPA 2.0: Adjustable compliant actuator with stiffening characteristic for energy efficient hopping , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[8]  K.W. Hollander,et al.  Adjustable robotic tendon using a 'Jack Spring'/spl trade/ , 2005, 9th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, 2005. ICORR 2005..

[9]  Antonio Bicchi,et al.  Design and Control of a Variable Stiffness Actuator for Safe and Fast Physical Human/Robot Interaction , 2005, Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[10]  D. Herring,et al.  Adjustable Robotic Tendon using a ‘ Jack Spring ’ TM , 2005 .

[11]  Stephen P. DeWeerth,et al.  Biologically Inspired Joint Stiffness Control , 2005, Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[12]  G. Hirzinger,et al.  A new variable stiffness design: Matching requirements of the next robot generation , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[13]  Antonio Bicchi,et al.  Fast and "soft-arm" tactics [robot arm design] , 2004, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine.

[14]  Matthew M. Williamson,et al.  Series elastic actuators , 1995, Proceedings 1995 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Human Robot Interaction and Cooperative Robots.