Testing Alternative Surface Disinfection Agents for Zebrafish (Danio rerio) Embryos.

Pathogen transmission into zebrafish colonies is controlled through vigilant biosecurity practices. One such practice is embryo surface disinfection, which often uses sodium hypochlorite. However, if sodium hypochlorite is used at an inappropriate pH, concentration, or exposure time, zebrafish embryos can experience significant mortality and morbidity. Reagent-grade sodium hypochlorite is often used for embryo surface disinfection because commercial-grade sodium hypochlorite has additional ingredients that may have deleterious effects on the embryo. In addition, chlorine dioxide and the combination ofsodium chloride and potassium peroxymonosulfate (SCPP) are effective equipment disinfectants; however, the effects ofthese chemical agents on zebrafish embryos during surface disinfection are unknown. In this study, we exposed strain 5Dzebrafish embryos (ages, 6 and 24 h postfertilization) to 4 chlorine-containing agents (reagent-grade sodium hypochlorite[bleach], commercial-grade sodium hypochlorite [bleach], SCPP, and chlorine dioxide) at either 50- or 100- ppm for 5 or 10 min.All groups were evaluated at 5 d postfertilization for survival, hatching rate, and morphologic defect rate. The experimentalgroup with the highest survival and hatching rates and the lowest morphologic defect rate was the 24-h postfertilizationembryos exposed to 50 ppm SCPP for 5 min. The survival, hatching rate, and defect rate did not differ significantly amongage-matched controls; however, the hatching rate after exposure to 50 ppm SCPP was significantly higher than that of embryosexposed to 50 ppm reagent-grade sodium hypochlorite for 5 min (100% compared with 23% respectively). SCPP solutionmay provide an alternative surface disinfectant for zebrafish embryos because it maximizes survival and hatching rates andminimizes morphologic defect rates. However, in vivo efficacy against common zebrafish pathogens requires further testing.Use of chlorine dioxide at 50 ppm or greater is not recommended for zebrafish embryo surface disinfection due to significantmortality among 6 and 24 h postfertilization embryos.

[1]  C. Lawrence,et al.  A fish is not a mouse: understanding differences in background genetics is critical for reproducibility , 2020, Lab Animal.

[2]  E. Riedel,et al.  Impact of Pronase, Sodium Thiosulfate, and Methylene Blue Combinations on Development and Survival of Sodium Hypochlorite Surface-Disinfected Zebrafish (Danio rerio) Embryos. , 2020, Zebrafish.

[3]  Peter Aleström,et al.  Zebrafish: Housing and husbandry recommendations , 2019, Laboratory animals.

[4]  E. Riedel,et al.  Transmission of Pseudoloma neurophilia in Laboratory Zebrafish (Danio rerio) When Using Mass Spawning Chambers and Recommendations for Chamber Disinfection. , 2017, Zebrafish.

[5]  C. Lawrence,et al.  Comparison of Antemortem and Environmental Samples for Zebrafish Health Monitoring and Quarantine. , 2017, Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS.

[6]  S. Scholz,et al.  Zebrafish embryo tolerance to environmental stress factors—Concentration–dose response analysis of oxygen limitation, pH, and UV‐light irradiation , 2017, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[7]  C. Whipps,et al.  Zebrafish Embryo Disinfection with Povidone-Iodine: Evaluating an Alternative to Chlorine Bleach. , 2016, Zebrafish.

[8]  M. Kent,et al.  Biosecurity and Health Monitoring at the Zebrafish International Resource Center. , 2016, Zebrafish.

[9]  J. Mocho.  Three-Dimensional Screen: A Comprehensive Approach to the Health Monitoring of Zebrafish , 2016, Zebrafish.

[10]  M. V. Cunha,et al.  Implementation of a Zebrafish Health Program in a Research Facility: A 4-Year Retrospective Study , 2016, Zebrafish.

[11]  Lloyd H. Michael,et al.  The Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. , 2016, ILAR journal.

[12]  C. Whipps,et al.  Evaluating the effectiveness of common disinfectants at preventing the propagation of Mycobacterium spp. isolated from zebrafish. , 2015, Comparative biochemistry and physiology. Toxicology & pharmacology : CBP.

[13]  Islam,et al.  Effect of water pH on the early developmental responses in zebrafish (danio rerio) , 2015 .

[14]  Horadam Aquarell.  Safety Data Sheet , 2015 .

[15]  C. Lawrence,et al.  The Biology and Management of the Zebrafish , 2015 .

[16]  N. Lipman,et al.  Evaluation of 5 cleaning and disinfection methods for nets used to collect zebrafish (Danio rerio). , 2014, Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS.

[17]  Robert L. Tanguay,et al.  Toxicity of chlorine to zebrafish embryos. , 2014, Diseases of aquatic organisms.

[18]  V. Watral,et al.  Verification of Intraovum Transmission of a Microsporidium of Vertebrates: Pseudoloma neurophilia Infecting the Zebrafish, Danio rerio , 2013, PloS one.

[19]  V. Watral,et al.  Spores of two fish microsporidia (Pseudoloma neurophilia and Glugea anomala) are highly resistant to chlorine. , 2007, Diseases of aquatic organisms.

[20]  Stephen A. Smith,et al.  Efficacy of Common Disinfectants against Mycobacterium marinum , 2005 .

[21]  Ralf Dahm,et al.  Zebrafish: A Practical Approach. Edited by C. NÜSSLEIN-VOLHARD and R. DAHM. Oxford University Press. 2002. 322 pages. ISBN 0 19 963808 X. Price £40.00 (paperback). ISBN 0 19 963809 8. Price £80.00 (hardback). , 2003 .

[22]  Alan S. Wagner.  The International Resource Center , 2000 .

[23]  Ronald D. Zweig.  Source water quality for aquaculture: a guide for assessment. , 1999 .

[24]  D. H. Bartley,et al.  The implementation of , 1986 .