Academic Search Engine Optimization (ASEO)

This article introduces and discusses the concept of academic search engine optimization (ASEO). Based on three recently conducted studies, guidelines are provided on how to optimize scholarly literature for academic search engines in general, and for Google Scholar in particular. In addition, we briefly discuss the risk of researchers' illegitimately ‘over-optimizing’ their articles.

[1]  John J. Meier,et al.  Google Scholar’s Coverage of the Engineering Literature: An Empirical Study , 2008 .

[2]  Fabrizio Silvestri,et al.  Know your neighbors: web spam detection using the web topology , 2007, SIGIR.

[3]  Jöran Beel,et al.  Google Scholar's ranking algorithm: The impact of citation counts (An empirical study) , 2009, 2009 Third International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science.

[4]  ZhangJin,et al.  The impact of metadata implementation on webpage visibility in search engine results (part II) , 2005 .

[5]  Harold Davis,et al.  Search Engine Optimization , 2006 .

[6]  Peter Kent,et al.  Search Engine Optimization For Dummies , 2004 .

[7]  Kazuyuki Aihara,et al.  A large-scale study of link spam detection by graph algorithms , 2007, AIRWeb '07.

[8]  Thomas Lavergne,et al.  Tracking Web Spam with Hidden Style Similarity , 2006, AIRWeb.

[9]  Stephen E. Robertson,et al.  Simple BM25 extension to multiple weighted fields , 2004, CIKM '04.

[10]  Dirk Lewandowski,et al.  Exploring the academic invisible web , 2006, Libr. Hi Tech.

[11]  William H. Walters,et al.  Google Scholar coverage of a multidisciplinary field , 2007, Inf. Process. Manag..

[12]  Jöran Beel,et al.  Google Scholar's Ranking Algorithm: The Impact of Articles' Age (An Empirical Study) , 2009, 2009 Sixth International Conference on Information Technology: New Generations.

[13]  Marc Najork,et al.  Detecting spam web pages through content analysis , 2006, WWW '06.

[14]  Brian D. Davison,et al.  Identifying link farm spam pages , 2005, WWW '05.

[15]  András A. Benczúr,et al.  SpamRank -- Fully Automatic Link Spam Detection , 2005, AIRWeb.

[16]  Michael P. Evans,et al.  Analysing Google rankings through search engine optimization data , 2007, Internet Res..

[17]  Torsten Suel,et al.  Improving web spam classifiers using link structure , 2007, AIRWeb '07.

[18]  Lei Wang,et al.  Three options for citation tracking: Google Scholar, Scopus and Web of Science , 2006, Biomedical digital libraries.

[19]  Hector Garcia-Molina,et al.  Link Spam Alliances , 2005, VLDB.

[20]  Jennifer Grappone,et al.  Search Engine Optimization: An Hour a Day , 2006 .

[21]  Ingmar Weber,et al.  An Analysis of Factors Used in Search Engine Ranking , 2005, AIRWeb.

[22]  Tobias Scheffer,et al.  Thwarting the Nigritude Ultramarine: Learning to Identify Link Spam , 2005, ECML.

[23]  Ira Steven Nathenson.  Internet Infoglut and Invisible Ink: Spamdexing Search Engines with Meta Tags , 1998 .

[24]  Otto-von-Guericke.  Google Scholar ’ s Ranking Algorithm : The Impact of Articles ’ Age ( An Empirical Study ) , 2009 .

[25]  Jöran Beel,et al.  Google Scholar’s Ranking Algorithm : An Introductory Overview , 2009 .

[26]  Baoning Wu,et al.  Extracting link spam using biased random walks from spam seed sets , 2007, AIRWeb '07.

[27]  Masahiro Kimura,et al.  Detecting Search Engine Spam from a Trackback Network in Blogspace , 2005, KES.

[28]  Tulsi Menon,et al.  GOOGLE SCHOLAR WEBSITE , 2007 .

[29]  Thomas Lavergne,et al.  Tracking Web spam with HTML style similarities , 2008, TWEB.

[30]  Marc Najork,et al.  Spam, damn spam, and statistics: using statistical analysis to locate spam web pages , 2004, WebDB '04.

[31]  Jin Zhang,et al.  The impact of metadata implementationon webpage visibility in search engine results (Part II) , 2005, Inf. Process. Manag..

[32]  Chunheng Wang,et al.  Improving Spamdexing Detection Via a Two-Stage Classification Strategy , 2008, AIRS.

[33]  András A. Benczúr,et al.  Link-Based Similarity Search to Fight Web Spam , 2006, AIRWeb.