Application of the Human Activity Assistive Technology model for occupational therapy research.

BACKGROUND/AIM Theoretical models provide a framework for describing practice and integrating evidence into systematic research. There are few models that relate specifically to the provision of assistive technology in occupational therapy practice. The Human Activity Assistive Technology model is an enduring example that has continued to develop by integrating a social model of disability, concepts from occupational therapy theory and principles of assistive technology adoption and abandonment. METHODS This study first describes the core concepts of the Human Activity Assistive Technology model and reviews its development over three successive published versions. A review of the research literature reflects application of the model to clinical practice, study design, outcome measure selection and interpretation of results, particularly among occupational therapists. An evaluative framework is used to critique the adequacy of the Human Activity Assistive Technology model for practice and research, exploring attributes of clarity, simplicity, generality, accessibility and importance. Finally, recommendations are proposed for continued development of the model and research applications. RESULTS Most of the existing research literature employs the Human Activity Assistive Technology model for background and study design; there is emerging evidence to support the core concepts as predictive factors. Although the concepts are generally simple, clear and applicable to occupational therapy practice and research, evolving terminology and outcomes become more complex with the conflation of integrated theories. CONCLUSIONS AND SIGNIFICANCE The development of the Human Activity Assistive Technology model offers enhanced access and application for occupational therapists, but poses challenges to clarity among concepts. Suggestions are made for further development and applications of the model.

[2]  Jerri Awaad.  Culture, Cultural Competency and Occupational Therapy: A Review of the Literature , 2003 .

[3]  L. D. de Witte,et al.  Existing models and instruments for the selection of assistive technology in rehabilitation practice , 2009, Scandinavian journal of occupational therapy.

[4]  B. Weiner,et al.  The shaping of individual meanings assigned to assistive technology: a review of personal factors , 2002, Disability and rehabilitation.

[5]  Jill G. Zwicker,et al.  A Reflection on Motor Learning Theory in Pediatric Occupational Therapy Practice , 2009, Canadian journal of occupational therapy. Revue canadienne d'ergotherapie.

[6]  Marion Hersh,et al.  On modelling assistive technology systems - Part I: Modelling framework , 2008 .

[7]  James A Lenker,et al.  Conceptualization and measurement of assistive technology usability , 2007, Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology.

[8]  L. D. de Witte,et al.  Methods for the selection of assistive technology in neurological rehabilitation practice , 2010, Scandinavian journal of occupational therapy.

[9]  Å. Brandt,et al.  Older people's use of powered wheelchairs for activity and participation. , 2004, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[10]  Wendy Strobel,et al.  Wheelchair ergonomics: Implications for vocational participation , 2006 .

[11]  Sajay Arthanat,et al.  Development of the Usability Scale for Assistive Technology-Wheeled Mobility: A preliminary psychometric evaluation , 2009 .

[12]  S. Dean,et al.  Theory development and a science of rehabilitation , 2005, Disability and rehabilitation.

[13]  Susanne Iwarsson,et al.  Occupational Therapy Research on Assistive Technology and Physical Environmental Issues: A Literature Review , 2006, Canadian journal of occupational therapy. Revue canadienne d'ergotherapie.

[14]  C. Tregaskis.  Social Model Theory: The story so far , 2002 .

[15]  S. Rodger.  Occupation-centred practice with children : a practical guide for occupational therapists , 2010 .

[16]  L. Wiart,et al.  Changing philosophical perspectives on the management of children with physical disabilities--their effect on the use of powered mobility , 2002, Disability and rehabilitation.

[17]  James A Lenker,et al.  Measuring usability of assistive technology from a multicontextual perspective: the case of power wheelchairs. , 2009, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[18]  M J Scherer,et al.  A framework for the conceptual modelling of assistive technology device outcomes , 2003, Disability and rehabilitation.

[19]  Thomas W. J. Janssen,et al.  Manual wheelchairs : research and innovation in sports and daily life , 2006 .

[20]  M.C. Carrozza,et al.  Assistive Technology: a New Approach to Evaluation , 2007, 2007 IEEE 10th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics.

[21]  J Angelo,et al.  Factors affecting the use of a single switch with assistive technology devices. , 2000, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[22]  EDWARD M. GIESBRECHT,et al.  Participation in community-based activities of daily living: Comparison of a pushrim-activated, power-assisted wheelchair and a power wheelchair , 2009, Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology.

[23]  James A Lenker,et al.  A Review of Conceptual Models for Assistive Technology Outcomes Research and Practice , 2003, Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA.

[24]  Claude Vincent,et al.  Mobility of wheelchair users: a proposed performance assessment framework. , 2003 .

[25]  Yao-Jen Chang,et al.  Comparing picture and video prompting in autonomous indoor wayfinding for individuals with cognitive impairments , 2010, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.