Synthetic seismicity models of multiple interacting faults

A synthetic seismicity model for multiple, interacting faults, of any strike and dip in a three-dimensional elastic half-space has been developed. The ultimate purpose is to determine how hazard is modified by elastic interactions of events in complex fault systems and to examine the synthetic seismicity for unusual behavior before large events that might be observable in the real world. Each fault is subdivided into some number of equal-sized patches, and a coefficient of static friction, random within a specified range, is assigned to each. The patch static strength is then the product of friction and differential normal stress. Stress (both shear and normal) accumulates due to some predefined tectonic driving force until one or more patches fail and slip instantaneously. The slip can be in any direction within the fault plane and its magnitude is determined by a specified fractional stress drop. This initial slip induces shear stress and strength changes on all other patches and faults and perhaps results in other patches failing. Patches can slip more than once ; once having failed, their strength is reduced, resulting in an overshoot that approximates the effect of dynamic stress enhancement. An event is over when all patches are stable. Although present computational constraints do not allow models with more than about 1500 patches, or a large number of faults, experiments with simple models of two parallel strike-slip faults (25 km length, 15 km depth, 694 m x 714 m patch size), driven at different rates and separated by 10 or 15 km, give some indicative results. A range of friction between 0.1 and 0.2, with a stress drop of 10% (about 3 MPa or 30 bars), produces a b value (500,000 events) close to 1. The models generate a distinct class of large characteristic events that rupture the full fault plane. The distribution of interevent times for the background seismicity is very similar to that for a Poisson process, while the characteristic events are quasi-periodic. Nearly half the larger events directly induce some activity on the other fault. The effect of a characteristic event on the occurrence of another characteristic event on the opposite fault is small and depends on the separation : at 10 km distance other events are retarded while at 15 km distance they are advanced. At 10-km separation the probability of a pair of characteristic events within 1 year is reduced to 0.3% from 1.7% for the case with no interaction. Consideration of interactions between slip on the faults and the driving mechanism, as well as higher stress drops and more overshoot, would increase the magnitude of the interaction effects.

[1]  Keisuke Ito,et al.  Earthquakes as self-organized critical phenomena , 1990 .

[2]  Keisuke Ito Periodicity and chaos in great earthquake occurrrence , 1980 .

[3]  Yehuda Ben-Zion,et al.  Earthquake Failure Sequences Along a Cellular Fault Zone in a Three-Dimensional Elastic Solid Containing Asperity and Nonasperity Regions , 1993 .

[4]  Bruce E. Shaw,et al.  Patterns of seismic activity preceding large earthquakes , 1992 .

[5]  J. Carlson,et al.  Time intervals between characteristic earthquakes and correlations with smaller events: An analysis based on a mechanical model of a fault , 1991 .

[6]  Shaw,et al.  Intrinsic properties of a Burridge-Knopoff model of an earthquake fault. , 1991, Physical review. A, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics.

[7]  Jian Lin,et al.  Change in Failure Stress on the Southern San Andreas Fault System Caused by the 1992 Magnitude = 7.4 Landers Earthquake , 1992, Science.

[8]  Keiiti Aki,et al.  Seismicity simulation with a mass-spring model and a displacement hardening-softening friction law , 1984 .

[9]  M. Ellis,et al.  Topography and tectonics of the central New Madrid seismic zone: Results of numerical experiments using a three‐dimensional boundary element program , 1994 .

[10]  Carlson Jm Two-dimensional model of a fault , 1991 .

[11]  L. Knopoff,et al.  Model and theoretical seismicity , 1967 .

[12]  R. Robinson,et al.  Synthetic seismicity models for the Wellington Region, New Zealand: Implications for the temporal distribution of large events , 1996 .

[13]  C. King Multicycle slip distribution along a laboratory fault , 1991 .

[14]  J. Dieterich Time‐dependent friction as a possible mechanism for aftershocks , 1972 .

[15]  A. Aydin,et al.  Stress transfer during three sequential moderate earthquakes along the central Calaveras Fault, California , 1993 .

[16]  William D. Stuart,et al.  Forecast model for great earthquakes at the Nankai Trough subduction zone , 1988 .

[17]  Seismic hazard induced by mechanically interactive fault segments , 1993, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[18]  Jie Huang,et al.  Chaotic seismic faulting with a mass-spring model and velocity-weakening friction , 1992 .

[19]  Steven N. Ward,et al.  A synthetic seismicity model for the Middle America Trench , 1991 .

[20]  Kim Christensen,et al.  Variation of the Gutenberg‐Richter b values and nontrivial temporal correlations in a Spring‐Block Model for earthquakes , 1992 .

[21]  Andrei Gabrielov,et al.  Block model of earthquake sequence , 1990 .

[22]  H. Kanamori The energy release in great earthquakes , 1977 .

[23]  Seismicity and self-organized criticality. , 1994, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[24]  J. Rundle A physical model for earthquakes: 2. Application to southern California , 1988 .

[25]  C. King Model seismicity and faulting parameters , 1975 .

[26]  P. Bak,et al.  Earthquakes as a self‐organized critical phenomenon , 1989 .

[27]  K. Sieh,et al.  Paleoseismic evidence of clustered earthquakes on the San Andreas Fault in the Carrizo Plain, California , 1994 .

[28]  John B. Rundle,et al.  A physical model for earthquakes: 1. Fluctuations and interactions , 1988 .

[29]  R. Simpson,et al.  Changes in static stress on southern California faults after the 1992 Landers earthquake , 1992, Nature.

[30]  Steven N. Ward,et al.  How regularly do earthquakes recur? A synthetic seismicity model for the San Andreas Fault , 1993 .

[31]  Steven N. Ward,et al.  An application of synthetic seismicity in earthquake statistics - The Middle America Trench , 1992 .

[32]  J. Dieterich A constitutive law for rate of earthquake production and its application to earthquake clustering , 1994 .

[33]  Andy Ruina,et al.  Slip patterns in a spatially homogeneous fault model , 1989 .

[34]  K. Hudnut,et al.  Cross-fault triggering in the November 1987 Superstition Hills earthquake sequence , 1989 .

[35]  J. Rice Spatio‐temporal complexity of slip on a fault , 1993 .

[36]  James R. Rice,et al.  Chapter 20 Fault Stress States, Pore Pressure Distributions, and the Weakness of the San Andreas Fault , 1992 .

[37]  Jean-Claude Mareschal,et al.  Strange seismic attractor? , 1993 .

[38]  G. King,et al.  STATIC STRESS CHANGES AND THE TRIGGERING OF EARTHQUAKES , 1994 .

[39]  P. Reasenberg,et al.  Response of Regional Seismicity to the Static Stress Change Produced by the Loma Prieta Earthquake , 1992, Science.

[40]  Y. Kagan Incremental Stress and Earthquakes , 1994 .

[41]  Yan Y. Kagan,et al.  Observational evidence for earthquakes as a nonlinear dynamic process , 1994 .

[42]  A cellular-automata, slider-block model for earthquakes I. Demonstration of chaotic behaviour for a low-order system , 1992 .

[43]  Takashi Miyatake,et al.  Numerical modelling of space and time variations of seismic activity before major earthquakes , 1983 .

[44]  T. Mikumo,et al.  Earthquake sequences on a frictional fault model with non-uniform strengths and relaxation times , 1979 .

[45]  Lynn R. Sykes,et al.  Changes in State of Stress on the Southern San Andreas Fault Resulting from the California Earthquake Sequence of April to June 1992 , 1992, Science.

[46]  Steven M. Day,et al.  Dynamics of fault interaction: parallel strike‐slip faults , 1993 .

[47]  Carlson,et al.  Mechanical model of an earthquake fault. , 1989, Physical review. A, General physics.

[48]  H. Kanamori,et al.  Application of an inhomogeneous stress (patch) model to complex subduction zone earthquakes: A discrete interaction matrix approach , 1987 .

[49]  W. D. Stuart Forecast model for large and great earthquakes in southern California , 1986 .

[50]  John B. Rundle,et al.  A simplified spring-block model of earthquakes , 1991 .

[51]  R. Robinson Shallow subduction tectonics and fault interaction: The Weber, New Zealand, earthquake sequence of 1990–1992 , 1994 .

[52]  Yan Y. Kagan,et al.  Long-term earthquake clustering , 1991 .

[53]  J. M. Carlson,et al.  Prediction of large events on a dynamical model of a fault , 1994 .

[54]  C. King Predictability of slip events along a laboratory fault , 1986 .

[55]  D. Vere-Jones Stochastic Models for Earthquake Occurrence , 1970 .

[56]  J. McCloskey,et al.  Time and magnitude predictions in shocks due to chaotic fault interactions , 1992 .

[57]  G. King,et al.  Stress Triggering of the 1994 M = 6.7 Northridge, California, Earthquake by Its Predecessors , 1994, Science.

[58]  Y. Okada Internal deformation due to shear and tensile faults in a half-space , 1992, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.