Visual search and mouse-pointing in labeled versus unlabeled two-dimensional visual hierarchies

An experiment investigates (1) how the physical structure of a computer screen layout affects visual search and (2) how people select a found target object with a mouse. Two structures are examined---labeled visual hierarchies (groups of objects with one label per group) and unlabeled visual hierarchies (groups without labels). Search and selection times were separated by imposing a point-completion deadline that discouraged participants from moving the mouse until they found the target. The observed search times indicate that labeled visual hierarchies can be searched much more efficiently than unlabeled visual hierarchies, and suggest that people use a fundamentally different strategy for each of the two structures. The results have implications for screen layout design and cognitive modeling of visual search. The observed mouse-pointing times suggest that people use a slower and more accurate speed-accuracy operating characteristic to select a target with a mouse when visual distractors are present, which suggests that Fitts' law coefficients derived from standard mouse-pointing experiments may under-predict mouse-pointing times for typical human-computer interactions. The observed mouse-pointing times also demonstrate that mouse movement times for a two-dimensional pointing task can be most-accurately predicted by setting the w in Fitts' law to the width of the target along the line of approach.

[1]  Anthony J. Hornof,et al.  Cognitive modeling reveals menu search in both random and systematic , 1997, CHI.

[2]  John R. Anderson,et al.  ACT-R: A Theory of Higher Level Cognition and Its Relation to Visual Attention , 1997, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[3]  Gerald L. Lohse,et al.  A Cognitive Model for Understanding Graphical Perception , 1993, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[4]  Ian Mackenzie,et al.  Fitts' law as a performance model in human-computer interaction , 1992 .

[5]  James E. McDonald,et al.  Searching for Items in Menus: The Effects of Organization and Type of Target , 1983 .

[6]  Wayne D. Gray,et al.  Milliseconds Matter: an Introduction to Microstrategies and to Their Use in Describing and Predicting Interactive Behavior Milliseconds Matter: an Introduction to Microstrategies and to Their Use in Describing and Predicting Interactive Behavior , 2022 .

[7]  Sung H. Han,et al.  A Comparison of Four Input Devices for the Macintosh Interface , 1990 .

[8]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Eye tracking the visual search of click-down menus , 1999, CHI '99.

[9]  N Walker,et al.  Spatial and Temporal Characteristics of Rapid Cursor-Positioning Movements with Electromechanical Mice in Human-Computer Interaction , 1993, Human factors.

[10]  I.,et al.  Fitts' Law as a Research and Design Tool in Human-Computer Interaction , 1992, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[11]  Susan T. Dumais,et al.  The vocabulary problem in human-system communication , 1987, CACM.

[12]  Stuart K. Card,et al.  Evaluation of mouse, rate-controlled isometric joystick, step keys, and text keys, for text selection on a CRT , 1987 .

[13]  Kevin Mullet,et al.  Designing Visual Interfaces: Communication Oriented Techniques , 1994 .

[14]  David E. Kieras,et al.  An Overview of the EPIC Architecture for Cognition and Performance With Application to Human-Computer Interaction , 1997, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[15]  Douglas J. Gillan,et al.  How does Fitts' law fit pointing and dragging? , 1990, CHI '90.

[16]  Thomas S. Tullis,et al.  A system for evaluating screen formats: Research and application , 1988 .

[17]  Anthony J. Hornof,et al.  The low-level cognitive processes involved in the visual search of pull-down menus and computer screens, as revealed by cognitive modeling , 1998, CHI Conference Summary.

[18]  Steven P. Tipper,et al.  Visual search and target-directed action , 1999 .

[19]  I. Scott MacKenzie,et al.  Fitts' Law as a Research and Design Tool in Human-Computer Interaction , 1992, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[20]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Split menus: effectively using selection frequency to organize menus , 1994, TCHI.

[21]  C. Lebiere,et al.  The Atomic Components of Thought , 1998 .

[22]  Nancy Staggers Impact of Screen Density on Clinical Nurses' Computer Task Performance and Subjective Screen Satisfaction , 1993, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[23]  Anthony J. Hornof,et al.  Cognitive modeling demonstrates how people use anticipated location knowledge of menu items , 1999, CHI '99.

[24]  M. J. Burns,et al.  Formatting space-related displays to optimize expert and nonexpert user performance , 1986, CHI '86.

[25]  D. Meyer,et al.  Eye-hand coordination: oculomotor control in rapid aimed limb movements. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[26]  NilsenErik PERCEPTUAL-MOTOR CONTROL IN HUMAN-COMPUTER INTERACTION , 1991 .

[27]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  The Psychology of Menu Selection: Designing Cognitive Control at the Human/Computer Interface , 1991 .

[28]  A. Treisman Perceptual grouping and attention in visual search for features and for objects. , 1982, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[29]  Wilbert O. Galitz,et al.  The Essential Guide to User Interface Design , 2002 .

[30]  John Tollett The Non-Designer's Web Book , 2000 .

[31]  Michael D. Byrne,et al.  ACT-R/PM and menu selection: applying a cognitive architecture to HCI , 2001, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[32]  Wilbert O. Galitz,et al.  The Essential Guide to User Interface Design: An Introduction to GUI Design Principles and Techniques , 1996 .

[33]  Benjamin L. Somberg,et al.  Locus of the Information Familiarity Effect in the Search of Computer Menus , 1983 .

[34]  Catherine M. Burns,et al.  Navigation strategies with ecological displays , 2000, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[35]  I. Scott MacKenzie,et al.  Extending Fitts' law to two-dimensional tasks , 1992, CHI.

[36]  P. Fitts The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. , 1954, Journal of experimental psychology.

[37]  Allen Newell,et al.  The psychology of human-computer interaction , 1983 .

[38]  Stuart K. Card,et al.  User perceptual mechanisms in the search of computer command menus , 1982, CHI '82.

[39]  Erik Nilsen,et al.  PERCEPTUAL-MOTOR CONTROL IN HUMAN-COMPUTER INTERACTION , 1991, SGCH.

[40]  Nancy J. Cooke,et al.  Design of Menus , 1997 .

[41]  Anthony J. Hornof,et al.  Computational models of the perceptual, cognitive, and motor processes involved in the visual search of pull -down menus and computer screens , 1999 .

[42]  Brian W. Epps Comparison of Six Cursor Control Devices Based on Fitts' Law Models , 1986 .

[43]  A. T. Welford,et al.  The fundamentals of skill , 1968 .