Collaborative Wi-Fi Fingerprint Training for Indoor Positioning

As the scope of location-based applications and services further reach into our everyday lives, the demand for more robust and reliable positioning becomes ever more important. However indoor positioning has never been a fully resolved issue due to its complexity and necessity to adapt to different situations and environment. Inertial sensor and Wi-Fi signal integrated indoor positioning have become good solutions to overcome many of the problems. Yet there are still problems such as inertial heading drift, wireless signal fluctuation and the time required for training a Wi-Fi fingerprint database. The collaborative Wi-Fi fingerprint training (cWiDB) method proposed in this paper enables the system to perform inertial measurement based collaborative positioning or Wi-Fi fingerprinting alternatively according to the current situation. It also reduces the time required for training the fingerprint database. Different database training methods and different training data size are compared to demonstrate the time and data required for generating a reasonable database. Finally the fingerprint positioning result is compared which indicates that the cWiDB is able to achieve the same positioning accuracy as conventional training methods but with less training time and a data adjustment option enabled.

[1]  François Marx,et al.  Advanced Integration of WiFi and Inertial Navigation Systems for Indoor Mobile Positioning , 2006, EURASIP J. Adv. Signal Process..

[2]  Jane Yung-jen Hsu,et al.  Collaborative Localization: Enhancing WiFi-Based Position Estimation with Neighborhood Links in Clusters , 2006, Pervasive.

[3]  Prashant Krishnamurthy,et al.  Analysis of WLAN's received signal strength indication for indoor location fingerprinting , 2012, Pervasive Mob. Comput..

[4]  Günther Retscher,et al.  Location determination using WiFi fingerprinting versus WiFi trilateration , 2007, J. Locat. Based Serv..

[5]  Young-Joo Suh,et al.  Characteristics of a large-scale WiFi radiomap and their implications in indoor localization , 2013, 2013 Fourth International Conference on the Network of the Future (NoF).

[6]  Robert Harle,et al.  SmartSLAM - An Efficient Smartphone Indoor Positioning System Exploiting Machine Learning and Opportunistic Sensing , 2013 .

[7]  Robert Harle,et al.  A Survey of Indoor Inertial Positioning Systems for Pedestrians , 2013, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[8]  B. R. Badrinath,et al.  Position and orientation in ad hoc networks , 2004, Ad Hoc Networks.

[9]  Chris Hide,et al.  Aiding Low Cost Inertial Navigation with Building Heading for Pedestrian Navigation , 2011, Journal of Navigation.

[10]  Günther Abwerzger,et al.  A Pedestrian Navigation System for Urban and Indoor Environments , 2007 .

[11]  Dieter Fox,et al.  Gaussian Processes for Signal Strength-Based Location Estimation , 2006, Robotics: Science and Systems.

[12]  Mikael Asplund,et al.  Why is fingerprint-based indoor localization still so hard? , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communication Workshops (PERCOM WORKSHOPS).

[13]  Bernard K.-S. Cheung,et al.  An Improved Neural Network Training Algorithm for Wi-Fi Fingerprinting Positioning , 2013, ISPRS Int. J. Geo Inf..

[14]  Limin Sun,et al.  Optimization of Sampling Cell Size for Fingerprint Positioning , 2014, Int. J. Distributed Sens. Networks.

[15]  Maria Garcia Puyol,et al.  Collaborative Pedestrian Mapping of Buildings Using Inertial Sensors and FootSLAM , 2011 .

[16]  Hugh F. Durrant-Whyte,et al.  A solution to the simultaneous localization and map building (SLAM) problem , 2001, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..