Home range dynamics and population regulation: An individual-based model of the common shrew Sorex araneus

Many territorial animals show marked home range dynamics. Depending on food resources and the presence of other individuals, the size, shape and location of home ranges can change even on short time scales. Home range dynamics are thus likely to be an important aspect of population regulation. Most existing models, however, assume static home ranges. We therefore present an individual-based model that describes home range dynamics on a daily time scale. As an example organism, we focus on the common shrew (Sorex araneus), which shows a marked territorial behaviour. The proximate purpose of the model is to capture the relation between home range dynamics and population dynamics. The ultimate purpose is to develop a model that can be used for predicting effects of changes in agricultural practice and pesticide risk assessment. In the model, home ranges are represented by a number of cells in a landscape which are used by a particular individual. They are constantly adapted in order to provide sufficient food resources for an animal. When home ranges do not provide sufficient resources, animals disperse. The model is able to reproduce site fidelity of individuals, habitat preference, and dispersal. Population densities in a mixed habitat structure resulted in densities approximately equal to those reported from field studies. It is shown that home range size and dispersal are density-dependent and therefore likely to have a strong effect on regulation. We conclude (1) that the basic design of our model is also applicable for other species showing a marked home range behaviour, and (2) that a realistic representation of population regulation might require explicit modelling of home range behaviour.

[1]  R. Ostfeld,et al.  The ecology of territoriality in small mammals. , 1990, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[2]  Florian Jeltsch,et al.  Importance of Buffer Mechanisms for Population Viability Analysis , 2005 .

[3]  Ian Newton,et al.  EXPERIMENTS ON THE LIMITATION OF BIRD NUMBERS BY TERRITORIAL BEHAVIOUR , 1992 .

[4]  S. Churchfield The Natural History of Shrews , 1991 .

[5]  Christian Wissel,et al.  Consolidation of Vineyards, Mitigations, and Survival of the Common Wall Lizard ( Podarcis Muralis ) in Isolated Habitat Fragments , 1996 .

[6]  T. Kostova,et al.  Individual-based spatially-explicit model of an herbivore and its resource: the effect of habitat reduction and fragmentation. , 2004, Comptes rendus biologies.

[7]  Steven W. Buskirk,et al.  HOME RANGE, TIME, AND BODY SIZE IN MAMMALS' , 1986 .

[8]  Paul R Moorcroft,et al.  Mechanistic home range models capture spatial patterns and dynamics of coyote territories in Yellowstone , 2006, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[9]  Donald L. Kramer,et al.  Territory Size as a Predictor of the Upper Limit to Population Density of Juvenile Salmonids in Streams , 1990 .

[10]  Josef Settele,et al.  Species survival in fragmented landscapes , 1996 .

[11]  Thorsten Wiegand,et al.  Expansion of Brown Bears (Ursus arctos) into the Eastern Alps: A Spatially Explicit Population Model , 2004, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[12]  G. Orians,et al.  Spacing Patterns in Mobile Animals , 1970 .

[13]  S. Churchfield Food Availability and the Diet of the Common Shrew, Sorex araneus, in Britain , 1982 .

[14]  Tomasz Wyszomirski,et al.  Modelling the role of social behavior in the persistence of the alpine marmot Marmota marmota , 2003 .

[15]  A. Harestad,et al.  Home Range and Body Weight‐‐A Reevaluation , 1979 .

[16]  S. Churchfield Population dynamics and the seasonal fluctuations in numbers of the common shrew in Britain , 1980 .

[17]  S. Churchfield An investigation of the population ecology of syntopic shrews inhabiting water-cress beds , 2009 .

[18]  T. Taylor,et al.  Fungal associations in the terrestrial paleoecosystern. , 1990, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[19]  R. Courtois,et al.  Space use of moose in relation to food availability , 2005 .

[20]  J. Pernetta Population Ecology of British Shrews in Grassland , 1977 .

[21]  Birgit Müller,et al.  A standard protocol for describing individual-based and agent-based models , 2006 .

[22]  Eldridge S. Adams,et al.  APPROACHES TO THE STUDY OF TERRITORY SIZE AND SHAPE , 2001 .

[23]  C. Mason,et al.  Small mammal populations in relation to hedgerow structure in an arable landscape , 2009 .

[24]  Hauke Reuter,et al.  Community processes as emergent properties: Modelling multilevel interaction in small mammals communities , 2005 .

[25]  S. Boutin Food supplementation experiments with terrestrial vertebrates: patterns, problems, and the future , 1990 .

[26]  V. Brown,et al.  Population dynamics and survivorship patterns in the common shrew Sorex araneus in southern England , 1995 .

[27]  W. H. Burt Territoriality and Home Range Concepts as Applied to Mammals , 1943 .

[28]  Bai-lian Li,et al.  Why do population density and inverse home range scale differently with body size?: Implications for ecosystem stability , 2005 .

[29]  V. Brown,et al.  Community structure and habitat use of small mammals in grasslands of different successional age , 2009 .

[30]  E. R. Keeley,et al.  The effect of food abundance on territory size and population density of juvenile steelhead trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) , 2004, Oecologia.

[31]  N. C. Michielsen Intraspecific and Interspecific Competition in the Shrews Sorex Araneus L. and S. Minutus L , 1966 .

[32]  M. L. Hawes Home Range, Territoriality and Ecological Separation in Sympatric Shrews, Sorex vagrans and Sorex obscurus , 1977 .

[33]  T. Schoener Sizes of Feeding Territories among Birds , 1968 .

[34]  R M Sibly,et al.  Risk Assessment of UK Skylark Populations Using Life-History and Individual-Based Landscape Models , 2005, Ecotoxicology.

[35]  D. DeAngelis,et al.  Individual-based modeling of ecological and evolutionary processes , 2005 .

[36]  E. Marshall,et al.  Arthropod abundance and diversity in differently vegetated margins of arable fields , 1999 .