Simulation studies of multiple dipole neuromagnetic source localization: model order and limits of source resolution

Numerical simulation studies were performed using a multiple-dipole source model and a spherical approximation of the head to determine how the resolution of simultaneously active neuromagnetic sources depends on source modeling assumptions (i.e., number of assumed dipoles), actual source parameters (e.g., location, orientation, and moment), and measurement errors. Forward calculations were made for a series of source configurations in which the number of dipoles, specific dipole parameters, and noise levels were systematically varied. Simulated noisy field distributions were fit by multiple dipole models of increasing model order (1,2, . . ., 6), and alternative statistical approaches (i.e., percent of variance, reduced chi-square, and F-ratio) were compared for their effectiveness in determining adequate model order. Limits of spatial resolution were established for a variety of multisource configurations and noise conditions. Implications for the analysis of empirical data are discussed.<<ETX>>

[1]  Samuel J. Williamson,et al.  Magnetic Fields of the Cerebral Cortex , 1980 .

[2]  R Llinás,et al.  Magnetic localization of neuronal activity in the human brain. , 1988, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  D. Geselowitz,et al.  Model studies of the magnetocardiogram. , 1973, Biophysical journal.

[4]  M. Hämäläinen,et al.  Feasibility of the homogeneous head model in the interpretation of neuromagnetic fields. , 1987, Physics in medicine and biology.

[5]  H. Casimir,et al.  On Supergain Antennae , 1968 .

[6]  John S. George,et al.  Identification of Multiple Sources in Transient Visual Evoked Neuromagnetic Responses , 1989 .

[7]  S. Williamson MAGNETIC LOCATION OF CORTICAL ACTIVITY * , 1980 .

[8]  L. Kaufman,et al.  Human auditory primary and association cortex have differing lifetimes for activation traces , 1992, Brain Research.

[9]  B. Neil Cuffin,et al.  Effects of Measurement Errors and Noise on MEG Moving Dipole Inverse Solutions , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[10]  R. Hari,et al.  Recording and interpretation of cerebral magnetic fields. , 1989, Science.

[11]  Jack K. Cohen,et al.  Nonuniqueness in the inverse source problem in acoustics and electromagnetics , 1975 .

[12]  Cees J. Stok,et al.  The influence of model parameters on EEG/MEG single dipole source estimation , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[13]  P. Nunez,et al.  The brain's magnetic field: some effects of multiple sources on localization methods. , 1986, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[14]  H Weinberg,et al.  Magnetic localisation of intracranial dipoles: simulation with a physical model. , 1986, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[15]  P. S. Lewis,et al.  Monte Carlo Analysis of Localization Errors in Magnetoencephalography , 1989 .

[16]  J Beatty,et al.  Magnetic localization of a dipolar current source implanted in a sphere and a human cranium. , 1986, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[17]  R. Hari,et al.  Spatial resolution of neuromagnetic records: theoretical calculations in a spherical model. , 1988, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.