Generalization of Noether’s Theorem in Modern Form to Non-variational Partial Differential Equations

A general method using multipliers for finding the conserved integrals admitted by any given partial differential equation (PDE) or system of partial differential equations is reviewed and further developed in several ways. Multipliers are expressions whose (summed) product with a PDE (system) yields a local divergence identity which has the physical meaning of a continuity equation involving a conserved density and a spatial flux for solutions of the PDE (system). On spatial domains, the integral form of a continuity equation yields a conserved integral. When a PDE (system) is variational, multipliers are known to correspond to infinitesimal symmetries of the variational principle, and the local divergence identity relating a multiplier to a conserved integral is the same as the variational identity used in Noether’s theorem for connecting conserved integrals to invariance of a variational principle. From this viewpoint, the general multiplier method is shown to constitute a modern form of Noether’s theorem in which the variational principle is not directly used. When a PDE (system) is non-variational, multipliers are shown to be an adjoint counterpart to infinitesimal symmetries, and the local divergence identity that relates a multiplier to a conserved integral is shown to be an adjoint generalization of the variational identity that underlies Noether’s theorem. Two main results are established for a general class of PDE systems having a solved-form for leading derivatives, which encompasses all typical PDE systems of physical interest. First, all non-trivial conserved integrals are shown to arise from non-trivial multipliers in a one-to-one manner, taking into account certain equivalence freedoms. Second, a simple scaling formula based on dimensional analysis is derived to obtain the conserved density and the spatial flux in any conserved integral, just using the corresponding multiplier and the given PDE (system). Also, a general class of multipliers that captures physically important conserved integrals such as mass, momentum, energy, angular momentum is identified. The derivations use a few basic tools from variational calculus, for which a concrete self-contained formulation is provided.

[1]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[2]  G. M.,et al.  Partial Differential Equations I , 2023, Applied Mathematical Sciences.

[3]  L. Alonso On the Noether map , 1979 .

[4]  W. Miller,et al.  Group analysis of differential equations , 1982 .

[5]  N. Ibragimov Transformation groups applied to mathematical physics , 1984 .

[6]  P. Olver Applications of Lie Groups to Differential Equations , 1986 .

[7]  Nail H. Ibragimov,et al.  Lie-Backlund Transformations in Applications , 1987 .

[8]  Local BRST cohomology in the antifield formalism: I. General theorems , 1994, hep-th/9405109.

[9]  G. Bluman,et al.  Direct Construction of Conservation Laws from Field Equations , 1997 .

[10]  A. Kara,et al.  Lie–Bäcklund and Noether Symmetries with Applications , 1998 .

[11]  M. Henneaux,et al.  Secondary Calculus and Cohomological Physics , 1998 .

[12]  C. Morawetz Variations on conservation laws for the wave equation , 2000 .

[13]  Classification of Local Conservation Laws of Maxwell's Equations , 2001, math-ph/0108017.

[14]  Stephen C. Anco,et al.  Direct construction method for conservation laws of partial differential equations Part I: Examples of conservation law classifications , 2001, European Journal of Applied Mathematics.

[15]  G. Bluman,et al.  Direct construction method for conservation laws of partial differential equations Part II: General treatment , 2001, European Journal of Applied Mathematics.

[16]  Thomas Wolf,et al.  A comparison of four approaches to the calculation of conservation laws , 2002, European Journal of Applied Mathematics.

[17]  Jet Nestruev,et al.  Smooth Manifolds and Observables , 2002, Graduate Texts in Mathematics.

[18]  G. Bluman,et al.  Symmetry and Integration Methods for Differential Equations , 2002 .

[19]  Conservation laws of scaling-invariant field equations , 2003, math-ph/0303066.

[20]  Dla Polski,et al.  EURO , 2004 .

[21]  Fazal M. Mahomed,et al.  Noether-Type Symmetries and Conservation Laws Via Partial Lagrangians , 2006 .

[22]  Stephen C. Anco,et al.  New conservation laws obtained directly from symmetry action on a known conservation law , 2006 .

[23]  N. Ibragimov A new conservation theorem , 2007 .

[24]  G. Bluman,et al.  Applications of Symmetry Methods to Partial Differential Equations , 2009 .

[25]  Y. Kosmann-Schwarzbach The Noether Theorems: Invariance and Conservation Laws in the Twentieth Century , 2010 .

[26]  Nail H. Ibragimov,et al.  Nonlinear self-adjointness and conservation laws , 2011, 1107.4877.

[27]  Willy Hereman,et al.  Symbolic computation of conservation laws for nonlinear partial differential equations in multiple space dimensions , 2010, J. Symb. Comput..

[28]  Y. Kosmann-Schwarzbach The Noether Theorems , 2011 .

[29]  S. Anco Symmetry properties of conservation laws , 2015, 1512.01835.

[30]  Stephen C. Anco On the Incompleteness of Ibragimov's Conservation Law Theorem and Its Equivalence to a Standard Formula Using Symmetries and Adjoint-Symmetries , 2017, Symmetry.

[31]  A. Kara,et al.  Symmetry-invariant conservation laws of partial differential equations† , 2015, European Journal of Applied Mathematics.