Orthogonal-Array based Design Methodology for Complex, Coupled Space Systems

The process of designing a complex system, formed by many elements and sub-elements interacting between each other, is usually completed at a system level and in the preliminary phases in two major steps: design-space exploration and optimization. In a classical approach, especially in a company environment, the two steps are usually performed together, by experts of the field inferring on major phenomena, making assumptions and doing some trial-and-error runs on the available mathematical models. To support designers and decision makers during the design phases of this kind of complex systems, and to enable early discovery of emergent behaviours arising from interactions between the various elements being designed, the authors implemented a parametric methodology for the design-space exploration and optimization. The parametric technique is based on the utilization of a particular type of matrix design of experiments, the orthogonal arrays. Through successive design iterations with orthogonal arrays, the optimal solution is reached with a reduced effort if compared to more computationally-intense techniques, providing sensitivity and robustness information. The paper describes the design methodology in detail providing an application example that is the design of a human mission to support a lunar base.

[1]  T Haftka Raphael,et al.  Multidisciplinary aerospace design optimization: survey of recent developments , 1996 .

[2]  Jaroslaw Sobieszczanski-Sobieski,et al.  Optimization by decomposition: A step from hierarchic to non-hierarchic systems , 1989 .

[3]  Farrokh Mistree,et al.  Experimental satellite trajectory analysis using decision-based robust design , 1995 .

[4]  Srinivas Kodiyalam,et al.  Initial Results of an MDO Method Evaluation Study , 1998 .

[5]  Yuan Charles,et al.  Evaluation of Methods for Multidisciplinary Design Optimization (MDO), Part II , 2000 .

[6]  Joaquim R. R. A. Martins,et al.  On the Common Structure of MDO Problems: A Comparison of Architectures , 2006 .

[7]  J. Sobieszczanski-Sobieski,et al.  Bilevel Integrated System Synthesis for Concurrent and Distributed Processing , 2002 .

[8]  N. Draper,et al.  Applied Regression Analysis , 1966 .

[9]  Jaroslaw Sobieszczanski-Sobieski,et al.  System-level Optimization and Concurrent Engineering: A Comparative Experiment , 2007 .

[10]  Farrokh Mistree,et al.  Simulation reduction using the Taguchi method , 1993 .

[11]  Gary B. Lamont,et al.  Evolutionary Algorithms for Solving Multi-Objective Problems , 2002, Genetic Algorithms and Evolutionary Computation.

[12]  Madhan Shridhar Phadke,et al.  Quality Engineering Using Robust Design , 1989 .

[13]  Jaroslaw Sobieszczanski-Sobieski,et al.  A Parallel Trade Study Architecture for Design Optimization of Complex Systems , 2005 .

[14]  Gyung-Jin Park,et al.  Comparison of MDO methods with mathematical examples , 2008 .

[15]  Jaroslaw Sobieszczanski-Sobieski,et al.  Integrated System-of-Systems Synthesis , 2008 .

[16]  L. Jezequel,et al.  Robust Design Optimization by First Design Method , 2009 .