The presence of an obstacle influences the stepping response during induced trips and surrogate tasks

Falling is a frequent cause of serious injury in older adults and trips are a dominant cause of falls in this rapidly growing population. Although there are few laboratory protocols that induce actual trips, there are many protocols that utilize surrogate tasks. These surrogate tasks, which are time-critical but do not involve an obstacle, appear to share a number of biomechanical characteristics with stepping responses following a trip. However, although rapid and safe negotiation of the obstacle and restoration of dynamic equilibrium are common requisites for success, we expected that stepping response kinematics during a successful recovery from a trip over a previously unseen obstacle would be substantially different than those of surrogate tasks without an obstacle. Unexpected trips were induced in 13 older men and women by an obstacle, the presence of which the subjects were previously unaware. Selected kinematics of the leading and trailing limb stepping responses during recovery from the induced trip were compared to those of two surrogate tasks that did not involve an obstacle. Multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) revealed that step height, step length, peak horizontal velocity, and peak vertical velocity of the leading and trailing limbs were significantly different during recovery from the induced trip compared to the surrogate tasks. These between-task performance differences may limit the extent to which performance of the surrogate tasks accurately and precisely reflect the potential to recover dynamic equilibrium following a trip. Therefore, these findings may be applicable in the design of new or modification of existing interventions to reduce falls in older adults.

[1]  A. Patla,et al.  Locomotor Patterns of the Leading and the Trailing Limbs as Solid and Fragile Obstacles Are Stepped Over: Some Insights Into the Role of Vision During Locomotion. , 1996, Journal of motor behavior.

[2]  L. Draganich,et al.  Stepping over an obstacle increases the motions and moments of the joints of the trailing limb in young adults. , 1997, Journal of biomechanics.

[3]  Daniel M. Wolpert,et al.  Forward Models for Physiological Motor Control , 1996, Neural Networks.

[4]  V. Dietz,et al.  Obstacle avoidance during human walking: learning rate and cross‐modal transfer , 2001, The Journal of physiology.

[5]  Stephen N Robinovitch,et al.  Effect of strength and speed of torque development on balance recovery with the ankle strategy. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[6]  L J Donaldson,et al.  Incidence of fractures in a geographically defined population. , 1990, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[7]  R. Norton,et al.  Circumstances of Falls Resulting in Hip Fractures Among Older People , 1997, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[8]  Aftab E Patla,et al.  The influence of multiple obstacles in the travel path on avoidance strategy. , 2002, Gait & posture.

[9]  L. Nyberg,et al.  Falls Leading to Femoral Neck Fractures in Lucid Older People , 1996, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[10]  T. M. Owings,et al.  Mechanisms leading to a fall from an induced trip in healthy older adults. , 2001, The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences.

[11]  A E Patla,et al.  Where and when do we look as we approach and step over an obstacle in the travel path? , 1997, Neuroreport.

[12]  Laura A. Wojcik,et al.  Age and gender differences in peak lower extremity joint torques and ranges of motion used during single-step balance recovery from a forward fall. , 2001, Journal of biomechanics.

[13]  V. Dietz,et al.  Obstacle avoidance during human walking: H-reflex modulation during motor learning , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[14]  J. Duysens,et al.  Muscular responses and movement strategies during stumbling over obstacles. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[15]  D. Jahnigen,et al.  Measures of paraspinal muscle performance do not predict initial trunk kinematics after tripping. , 1996, Journal of biomechanics.

[16]  D. Winter,et al.  Strategies for recovery from a trip in early and late swing during human walking , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[17]  V. Dietz,et al.  Obstacle avoidance during human walking: transfer of motor skill from one leg to the other , 2002, The Journal of physiology.

[18]  B. T. Young,et al.  Outcome following nonoperative treatment of displaced distal radius fractures in low-demand patients older than 60 years. , 2000, The Journal of hand surgery.

[19]  T. M. Owings,et al.  Gait characteristics as risk factors for falling from trips induced in older adults. , 1999, The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences.

[20]  T. M. Owings,et al.  Mechanisms of failed recovery following postural perturbations on a motorized treadmill mimic those associated with an actual forward trip. , 2001, Clinical biomechanics.

[21]  R. Cumming,et al.  Fall Frequency and Characteristics and the Risk of Hip Fractures , 1994, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[22]  R. Bhopal,et al.  Coping with an upper limb fracture? A study of the elderly. , 1992, Public health.

[23]  T. M. Owings,et al.  Measures of Postural Stability Are Not Predictors of Recovery from Large Postural Disturbances in Healthy Older Adults , 2000, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[24]  A J van den Bogert,et al.  Response time is more important than walking speed for the ability of older adults to avoid a fall after a trip. , 2002, Journal of biomechanics.

[25]  D. Jahnigen,et al.  Kinematics of recovery from a stumble. , 1993, Journal of gerontology.

[26]  N. Alexander,et al.  A clinical measure of maximal and rapid stepping in older women. , 2000, The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences.

[27]  J. Duysens,et al.  Mechanically induced stumbling during human treadmill walking , 1996, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.