Interpretive analysis of spoken discourse: Dealing with the limitations of quantitative and qualitative methods

Quantitative and qualitative methods of analyzing discourse, while producing some pertinent findings, suffer from a number of limitations. Such limitations have become apparent in studies of doctor‐patient communication but also manifest themselves in research on other forms of spoken, interpersonal communication. Quantitative methods alone do not deal with complexities of discourse, usually are not helpful in analyzing the social context in which discourse arises, do not clarify underlying themes and structures, and are costly and tedious to use. With qualitative methods, the selection of discourse for analysis is not straightforward, quality of interpretation is difficult to evaluate, and textual presentation is not clear‐cut. Several criteria of an appropriate method offer reasonable compromises in dealing with these limitations: a) discourse should be selected through a sampling procedure, preferably a randomized technique; b) recordings of sampled discourse should be available for review by other obs...

[1]  H. Waitzkin,et al.  On Studying the Discourse of Medical Encounters: A Critique of Quantitative and Qualitative Methods and a Proposal for Reasonable Compromise , 1990, Medical care.

[2]  H. Waitzkin,et al.  A Critical Theory of Medical Discourse: How Patients and Health Professionals Deal with Social Problems , 1989, International journal of health services : planning, administration, evaluation.

[3]  D. R. Heise,et al.  The Syntax of Social Life: The Theory and Method of Comparative Narratives. , 1989 .

[4]  R. Frankel.  “I wz wondering‐uhm could raid uhm effect the brain permanently d'y know?”: Some observations on the intersection of speaking and writing in calls to a poison control center , 1989 .

[5]  H. Waitzkin,et al.  A critical theory of medical discourse: ideology, social control, and the processing of social context in medical encounters. , 1989, Journal of health and social behavior.

[6]  W. Stiles,et al.  Evaluating Medical Interview Process Components: Null Correlations With Outcomes May Be Misleading , 1989, Medical care.

[7]  D. Buller,et al.  Patients’ Characteristics Affecting Physician‐Patient Nonverbal Communication , 1988 .

[8]  Judith A. Hall,et al.  Meta-analysis of Correlates of Provider Behavior in Medical Encounters , 1988, Medical care.

[9]  P. Ricoeur,et al.  Lectures on ideology and utopia , 1988 .

[10]  S. Fisher.  In the Patient's Best Interest: Women and the Politics of Medical Decisions , 1988 .

[11]  Anthony Giddens,et al.  5. Action, Subjectivity, and the Constitution of Meaning , 1987 .

[12]  David B. Buller,et al.  Nonverbal response patterns in physician-patient interactions: A functional analysis , 1987 .

[13]  A. Kellerman,et al.  The Constitution of Society : Outline of the Theory of Structuration , 2015 .

[14]  J. Kirk,et al.  Reliability and Validity in Qualitative Research , 1985 .

[15]  H. Waitzkin.  Information giving in medical care. , 1985, Journal of health and social behavior.

[16]  W. Carter,et al.  Problems and prospects for health services research on provider-patient communication. , 1985, Medical care.

[17]  C. West.  Routine Complications: Troubles with Talk Between Doctors and Patients , 1984 .

[18]  H. Waitzkin.  Doctor-patient communication. Clinical implications of social scientific research. , 1984, JAMA.

[19]  H. Waitzkin.  The Micropolitics of Medicine: A Contextual Analysis , 1984, International journal of health services : planning, administration, evaluation.

[20]  Richard M. Frankel,et al.  From sentence to sequence: Understanding the medical encounter through microinteractional analysis , 1984 .

[21]  A. Giddens.  New rules of sociological method : a positive critique of interpretative sociologies , 1980 .

[22]  H. Waitzkin,et al.  The informative process in medical care: A preliminary report with implications for instructional communication , 1978 .

[23]  A. Giddens,et al.  New Rules of Sociological Method: A Positive Critique of Interpretative Sociologies. , 1977 .

[24]  H. Waitzkin,et al.  Information control and the micropolitics of health care: summary of an ongoing research project. , 1976, Social science & medicine.

[25]  H. Waitzkin,et al.  The Exploitation of Illness in Capitalist Society. , 1975 .

[26]  Richard Sennett,et al.  The Hidden Injuries of Class , 1973 .

[27]  Howard Waitzkin,et al.  The Politics of Medical Encounters: How Patients and Doctors Deal With Social Problems , 1991 .

[28]  Michael King.  Communication and medical practice: D. Silverman: Sage, London (1987). pp. viii + 279. £10.95 paperback; £25.00 hardback. , 1989 .

[29]  A. Kleinman.  The Illness Narratives , 1988 .

[30]  L. Gottschalk,et al.  Content Analysis of Verbal Behavior , 1986, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[31]  A. Cicourel.  Text and Discourse , 1985 .

[32]  Frederick Mosteller,et al.  Applied Bayesian and classical inference : the case of the Federalist papers , 1984 .

[33]  E. Mishler,et al.  Discourse Of Medicine Dialectics Of Medical Interviews , 2017 .

[34]  H. Waitzkin.  The Second Sickness: Contradictions of Capitalist Health Care , 1983 .

[35]  K. Rosengren.  Advances in Content Analysis , 1981 .

[36]  H. Waitzkin.  Medicine, superstructure and micropolitics. , 1979, Social science & medicine. Medical psychology & medical sociology.

[37]  H. Waitzkin,et al.  Physician stereotypes about female health and illness: a study of patient's sex and the informative process during medical interviews. , 1979, Women & health.

[38]  H. Waitzkin,et al.  The Communication of Information about Illness , 1972 .

[39]  S. Freud.  Fragment of an analysis of a case of hysteria , 1905 .