Noxious Stimulation Response Index: A Novel Anesthetic State Index Based on Hypnotic–Opioid Interaction
暂无分享,去创建一个
Hugo Vereecke | Michel M R F Struys | Peter M Schumacher | Martin Luginbühl | T. Bouillon | M. Struys | B. Heyse | M. Luginbühl | P. Vuilleumier | P. Schumacher | H. Vereecke | Thomas W Bouillon | Pascal Vuilleumier | Björn Heyse
[1] A M Zbinden,et al. Prediction of the haemodynamic response to tracheal intubation: comparison of laser-Doppler skin vasomotor reflex and pulse wave reflex. , 2002, British journal of anaesthesia.
[2] G. Xie,et al. A Response Surface Analysis of Propofol–Remifentanil Pharmacodynamic Interaction in Volunteers , 2004, Anesthesiology.
[3] T. Bouillon. Hypnotic and opioid anesthetic drug interactions on the CNS, focus on response surface modeling. , 2008, Handbook of experimental pharmacology.
[4] Thomas W. Schnider,et al. Influence of age and gender on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of remifentanil. I. Model development , 1997 .
[5] S. Petersen-Felix,et al. Heart rate variability does not discriminate between different levels of haemodynamic responsiveness during surgical anaesthesia. , 2007, British journal of anaesthesia.
[6] S L Shafer,et al. The influence of age on propofol pharmacodynamics. , 1999, Anesthesiology.
[7] A. Yli-Hankala,et al. Tetanic stimulus of ulnar nerve as a predictor of heart rate response to skin incision in propofol remifentanil anaesthesia. , 2007, British journal of anaesthesia.
[8] H. Storm,et al. Comparison of skin conductance with entropy during intubation, tetanic stimulation and emergence from general anaesthesia , 2007, Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica.
[9] A. McEwan,et al. The Interaction of Fentanyl on the Cp50 of Propofol for Loss of Consciousness and Skin Incision , 1994, Anesthesiology.
[10] I Korhonen,et al. Stimulation induced variability of pulse plethysmography does not discriminate responsiveness to intubation. , 2006, British journal of anaesthesia.
[11] Hugo Vereecke,et al. Ability of the Bispectral Index, Autoregressive Modelling with Exogenous Input-derived Auditory Evoked Potentials, and Predicted Propofol Concentrations to Measure Patient Responsiveness during Anesthesia with Propofol and Remifentanil , 2003, Anesthesiology.
[12] N. T. Smith,et al. Performance of the ARX-derived Auditory Evoked Potential Index as an Indicator of Anesthetic Depth: A Comparison with Bispectral Index and Hemodynamic Measures during Propofol Administration , 2002, Anesthesiology.
[13] S L Shafer,et al. Influence of Age and Gender on the Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Remifentanil: I. Model Development , 1997, Anesthesiology.
[14] S L Shafer,et al. Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Remifentanil: II. Model Application , 1997, Anesthesiology.
[15] S. Shafer,et al. The Influence of Method of Administration and Covariates on the Pharmacokinetics of Propofol in Adult Volunteers , 1998, Anesthesiology.
[16] A. Yli-Hankala,et al. Assessment of surgical stress during general anaesthesia. , 2007, British journal of anaesthesia.
[17] H. Storm,et al. Skin conductance or entropy for detection of non‐noxious stimulation during different clinical levels of sedation , 2007, Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica.
[18] J. Bruhn,et al. Pharmacodynamic Interaction between Propofol and Remifentanil Regarding Hypnosis, Tolerance of Laryngoscopy, Bispectral Index, and Electroencephalographic Approximate Entropy , 2004, Anesthesiology.
[19] Erik Olofsen,et al. Propofol Reduces Perioperative Remifentanil Requirements in a Synergistic Manner: Response Surface Modeling of Perioperative Remifentanil–Propofol Interactions , 2003, Anesthesiology.
[20] Warren D. Smith,et al. Measuring the Performance of Anesthetic Depth Indicators , 1996, Anesthesiology.