Supporting Ph.D. students' skills development: A three-stage doctoral program

Introduction Sustainable development is increasingly recognized as a crucial component of education at all levels, including specialized academic work. As a result, the importance of Ph.D. training in producing highly skilled academics and professionals who can contribute to sustainable development has been acknowledged, leading to increased investments in doctoral training across Europe. However, the diversity in Ph.D. training across countries and universities suggests a lack of studies based on best practices for developing effective doctoral training programs. Methods This study aimed to contribute to this discussion by combining the perspectives of 31 Ph.D. supervisors and directors from Portugal and England regarding the best practices for Ph.D. training. Participants from different disciplines were interviewed using semi-structured face-to-face interviews, and the data were analyzed using inductive thematic analysis. Results The study found that, despite coming from different countries, the participants' perceptions regarding the challenges and strategies for improving doctoral education were similar. Based on these findings, the study proposes a three-stage program for structuring doctoral training, consisting of initial intensive training, assessment of individual needs, and tailored training. Discussion The proposed program has the potential to be valuable in the development or restructuring of Ph.D. programs to address the primary needs of Ph.D. students, optimize institutional resources, and promote on-time completion by facilitating the timely development of necessary competencies for Ph.D. research. Furthermore, this approach could enhance the quality of Ph.D. education, broaden the spectrum and quality of graduates' competencies, and contribute to achieving sustainable development goals.

[1]  D. Elliot.  A ‘doctoral compass’: strategic reflection, self-assessment and recalibration for navigating the ‘twin’ doctoral journey , 2021, Studies in Higher Education.

[2]  Martin Neugebauer,et al.  Back out or hang on? An event history analysis of withdrawal from doctoral education in Germany , 2021, Higher Education.

[3]  Luís Rato,et al.  University Teachers’ Conceptions of the University and the Place of Sustainability , 2021, Sustainability.

[4]  I. Huet,et al.  Exploring the professional development of online and distance doctoral supervisors , 2020 .

[5]  D. Elliot,et al.  The Hidden Curriculum in Doctoral Education , 2020 .

[6]  Katherine Richardson,et al.  Global Sustainable Development Report 2019 , 2019, Global Sustainable Development Report.

[7]  M. Fokkens-Bruinsma,et al.  Factors that influence PhD candidates’ success: the importance of PhD project characteristics , 2019, Studies in Continuing Education.

[8]  I. Bogle.  100 Years of the PhD in the UK , 2018 .

[9]  Lynn McAlpine,et al.  The PhD Experience: A Review of the Factors Influencing Doctoral Students’ Completion, Achievement, and Well-Being , 2018 .

[10]  K. Geven,et al.  How to Increase PhD Completion Rates? An Impact Evaluation of Two Reforms in a Selective Graduate School, 1976–2012 , 2018 .

[11]  Deborah E. White,et al.  Thematic Analysis , 2017 .

[12]  Wendy Bastalich.  Content and context in knowledge production: a critical review of doctoral supervision literature , 2017 .

[13]  M. Castelló,et al.  Why do students consider dropping out of doctoral degrees? Institutional and personal factors , 2017 .

[14]  B. Durette,et al.  The core competencies of PhDs , 2016 .

[15]  A. Sonesson,et al.  The formation of doctoral education , 2016 .

[16]  Frédéric Guay,et al.  Dropout intentions in PhD Studies : a comprehensive model based on interpersonal relationships and motivational resources , 2015 .

[17]  K. Vandevelde,et al.  The PhD track: Who succeeds, who drops out? , 2013 .

[18]  I. Huet,et al.  Construction of scientific knowledge and meaning: perceptions of Portuguese doctoral students , 2012 .

[19]  Matthew G. Falk,et al.  Factors affecting timely completion of a PhD: a complex systems approach , 2012 .

[20]  R. Parker.  Skill development in graduate education. , 2012, Molecular cell.

[21]  Alexeis Garcia-Perez,et al.  Modelling research: a collaborative approach to helping PhD students develop higher-level research skills , 2012 .

[22]  Eirini Geraniou,et al.  The transitional stages in the PhD degree in mathematics in terms of students’ motivation , 2010 .

[23]  Minli Liao,et al.  FACILITATING DISSERTATION COMPLETION AND SUCCESS AMONG DOCTORAL STUDENTS IN SOCIAL WORK , 2009 .

[24]  Susan K. Gardner.  Student and faculty attributions of attrition in high and low-completing doctoral programs in the United States , 2009 .

[25]  Lynn McAlpine,et al.  Reframing our approach to doctoral programs: an integrative framework for action and research , 2006 .

[26]  V. Braun,et al.  Using thematic analysis in psychology , 2006 .

[27]  Norhasni Zainal Abiddin,et al.  Supervisory Patterns and Practices: Case Studies at the University of Manchester, United Kingdom , 2005 .

[28]  Norhasni Zainal Abiddin.  Supervisory Patterns and Practices: Case Studies at the University of Manchester, United Kingdom , 2005 .

[29]  Yaritza Ferrer de Valero.  Departmental Factors Affecting Time-to-Degree and Completion Rates of Doctoral Students at One Land-Grant Research Institution , 2001 .

[30]  Glendell Jones,et al.  Conclusion: Doctoral Education and Training – A Global Convergence? , 2018 .

[31]  Glendell Jones,et al.  The Increasing Importance, Growth, and Evolution of Doctoral Education , 2018 .

[32]  P. Videira,et al.  A Tale of Expansion and Change: Major Trends in Doctoral Training and in the Doctoral Population in Portugal , 2018 .

[33]  O. Klein,et al.  Doctoral students’ experiences leading to completion or attrition: a matter of sense, progress and distress , 2017 .

[34]  Bianca L. Bernstein,et al.  The Continuing Evolution of the Research Doctorate , 2014 .

[35]  Amanda J. Rockinson-Szapkiw,et al.  Hearing their voices: Factors doctoral candidates attribute to their persistence , 2012 .

[36]  Anthony J. Onwuegbuzie,et al.  A Mixed Research Investigation of Factors Related to Time to the Doctorate in Education , 2011 .

[37]  P. Freire.  Pedagogy of Freedom: Ethics, Democracy, and Civic Courage , 1998 .