A Guideline to Use Activity Theory for Collaborative Healthcare Information Systems Design

In healthcare, collaborative systems serve very different stakeholders: researchers, clinicians, nurses, patients, and administrators for instance. In order to design a collaborative healthcare information system that satisfies the stakeholders’ needs, all individual requirements have to be mapped into the software. Traditional system design focuses at technical features and oftentimes ignores social requirements like human factors or organizational structures. Instead of integrating existing processes and working habits into a system, a technical-focused design approach tries to force new behaviors. As a result, stakeholders could refuse to use collaborative healthcare information systems. In line with Kuutti (1991), we recommend activity theory as a rich framework to study and design collaborative information systems. We believe that activity theory analysis is particularly useful for healthcare settings where diverse stakeholders pursue very different goals. This book chapter offers a structured approach to analyze collaborative activities and to design the IT-support accordingly. A Guideline to Use Activity Theory for Collaborative Healthcare Information Systems Design

[1]  Yrjö Engeström,et al.  Measurement in action: an activity-theoretical perspective on producer-user interaction , 2000, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[2]  Nilmini Wickramasinghe,et al.  The Application of Activity Theory to Explain Collaborative Technology Use in Healthcare: The Case of a Chemotherapy Ordering System , 2016, 2016 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS).

[3]  Robert Kay,et al.  Mobile technology adoption for mobile information systems: an activity theory perspective , 2005, International Conference on Mobile Business (ICMB'05).

[4]  Carolin Durst,et al.  An Empirical Analysis of System-generated Data in Location-based Crowdsourcing , 2015, Wirtschaftsinformatik.

[5]  Nitesh Bharosa,et al.  An activity theory analysis of boundary objects in cross-border information systems development for disaster management , 2012, Security Informatics.

[6]  Gregory Z. Bedny,et al.  Application of Systemic-Structural Activity Theory to Design and Training , 2014 .

[7]  Ryad Titah,et al.  Information System Use - Related Activity: An Expanded Behavioral Conceptualization of Individual-Level Information System Use , 2007, Inf. Syst. Res..

[8]  Steve Sawyer,et al.  Sociotechnical Approaches to the Study of Information Systems , 2014 .

[9]  Payam Sadeghi,et al.  Activity Theory Driven System Analysis of Complex Healthcare Processes , 2014, ECIS.

[10]  Y. Engeström,et al.  Activity theory as a framework for analyzing and redesigning work. , 2000, Ergonomics.

[11]  Afsaneh Doryab,et al.  Activity analysis: applying activity theory to analyze complex work in hospitals , 2011, CSCW.

[12]  Yrjö Engeström,et al.  Pedagogical Adeptness in the Design of E-learning Environments: Experiences from the Lab@Future Project , 2003 .

[13]  Daisy Mwanza-Simwami,et al.  AODM as a framework and model for characterising learner experiences with technology , 2011 .

[14]  Christine Greenhow,et al.  Using activity-oriented design methods to study collaborative knowledge-building in e-learning courses within higher education , 2007, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..

[15]  Kari Kuutti,et al.  The Concept of Activity as a Basic Unit of Analysis for CSCW Research , 1991, ECSCW.

[16]  Yvonne Rogers.  57 Varieties of Activity Theory , 2008, Interact. Comput..

[17]  María A. Rodríguez-Manzanares,et al.  Using activity theory and its principle of contradictions to guide research in educational technology , 2008 .

[18]  John Kar-Kin Zao,et al.  Activity-Oriented Design of Health Pal: A Smart Phone for Elders' Healthcare Support , 2008, EURASIP J. Wirel. Commun. Netw..

[19]  Daisy Mwanza,et al.  Conceptualising work activity for CAL systems design , 2002 .

[20]  Victor Kaptelinin,et al.  Methods & tools: The activity checklist: a tool for representing the “space” of context , 1999, INTR.

[21]  Helen Hasan,et al.  An Activity-Theory Analysis of Corporate Wikis , 2012, Inf. Technol. People.

[22]  Nicolas Marmaras,et al.  Socio-technical Systems Analysis: Which approach should be followed? , 2002 .

[23]  Nor Shahida Mohamad Yusop,et al.  Using activity theory in analyzing requirements for mobile phone application , 2011, 2011 Malaysian Conference in Software Engineering.