Advances in Enterprise Engineering XII

Perspectives in organizations differ to which extent information systems (IS) should be tailored towards local (e.g., business unit) needs or toward organization-wide, global goals (e.g., synergies, integration). For contributing to overall IS performance success, the harmonization of different perspectives becomes essential. While many scholars have highlighted the role of IS management approaches, institutional studies argue that harmonization is not solely the result of managerial action, but a consequence of institutional pressures that guide organizational decision-making. In the paper at hand, we follow the call for adopting institutional theory on the intra-organizational level of analysis and study the logic of attaining harmonization along institutional pressures. By means of a revelatory case study, we find harmonization attained in a dynamic interplay between different institutional pressures. Mimetic pressures influence normative pressures, which in turn influence coercive pressures. Our findings as well as our implications for enterprise engineering guide prospective research in studying the attainment of harmonization through an institutional lens.

[1]  Jan Mendling,et al.  Untrusted Business Process Monitoring and Execution Using Blockchain , 2016, BPM.

[2]  Mark Klein,et al.  A knowledge-based approach for handling exceptions in business processes , 2000, Inf. Technol. Manag..

[3]  Jan Mendling,et al.  Blockchain-Based Traceability of Inter-organisational Business Processes , 2018, BMSD.

[4]  R. Handfield,et al.  The role of trust and relationship structure in improving supply chain responsiveness , 2002 .

[5]  José M. Tribolet,et al.  Control Organization: A DEMO Based Specification and Extension , 2011, EEWC.

[6]  Thomas H. Davenport,et al.  Book review:Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know. Thomas H. Davenport and Laurence Prusak. Harvard Business School Press, 1998. $29.95US. ISBN 0‐87584‐655‐6 , 1998 .

[7]  Hans Weigand,et al.  Understanding the Blockchain Using Enterprise Ontology , 2017, CAiSE.

[8]  Jan L. G. Dietz,et al.  Enterprise ontology - theory and methodology , 2006 .

[9]  Marlon Dumas,et al.  Optimized Execution of Business Processes on Blockchain , 2016, BPM.

[10]  Eduard Babkin,et al.  Towards Devising an Architectural Framework for Enterprise Operating Systems , 2018, ICSOFT.

[11]  Samir Chatterjee,et al.  A Design Science Research Methodology for Information Systems Research , 2008 .

[12]  Linus U. Opara,et al.  Traceability in agriculture and food supply chain: A review of basic concepts, technological implications, and future prospects , 2002 .

[13]  Vineet Padmanabhan,et al.  Comments on "Information Distortion in a Supply Chain: The Bullwhip Effect" , 1997, Manag. Sci..

[14]  Wided Guédria,et al.  A Meta Model for Interoperability of Secure Business Transactions - Using BlockChain and DEMO , 2017, KEOD.

[15]  Francesco Marcelloni,et al.  Patterns and technologies for enabling supply chain traceability through collaborative e-business , 2008, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[16]  Michael Devetsikiotis,et al.  Blockchains and Smart Contracts for the Internet of Things , 2016, IEEE Access.

[17]  Orlenys López-Pintado,et al.  Caterpillar: A Blockchain-Based Business Process Management System , 2017, BPM.

[18]  André Vasconcelos,et al.  Enforcing control in the run-time business transactions , 2012 .

[19]  J.G.A.J. van der Vorst,et al.  Simulation modelling and risk assessment as tools to identify the impact of climate change on microbiological food safety – The case study of fresh produce supply chain , 2010 .

[20]  Jane P. Laudon,et al.  Management Information Systems: Managing the Digital Firm , 2010 .

[21]  Sérgio Guerreiro Designing a Decision-Making Process for Partially Observable Environments Using Markov Theory , 2017, BPMDS/EMMSAD@CAiSE.