Communication and Interpretation of Results of Route Risk Analyses of Hazardous Materials Transportation by Railroad

Route risk analysis of hazardous materials transportation by railroad is receiving considerable new attention from industry and government. Such analyses are necessary for effective public policy and development of rational risk management strategies. However, route risk analysis is complex and generates results that can be difficult to properly interpret. Risk analyses are intended to provide risk managers with objective information about how to effectively manage risk and the most effective options to reduce it. This paper uses results from a quantitative risk analysis of hazardous materials shipped by rail to develop and illustrate several new techniques to present, interpret, and communicate risk results more effectively. The analysis accounted for the major factors affecting risk: infrastructure quality, traffic volume, and population exposure along shipment routes, as well as tank car design and product characteristics. Approaches for system-level and route-specific analyses are presented. Both absolute and normalized estimates of risk provide useful information. The question of interest and the user affects which type of information is most useful for effective decision making. Various graphical techniques enable risk metrics to be compared and contrasted, either in a geographic context or independent of it, depending on which is most useful. Identifying the locations that account for the highest concentration of risk and understanding the contributing factors will also clarify the mutual roles of carriers, shippers, and municipalities along a route in regard to risk management, reduction, and mitigation options. In addition, the techniques presented in this paper may also be useful for regulators and researchers who might be interested in a broader view of risk analysis at the network level.

[1]  Kurt Fedra,et al.  Integrated risk assessment and management: overview and state of the art , 1998 .

[2]  P R Nayak,et al.  EVENT PROBABILITIES AND IMPACT ZONES FOR HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ACCIDENTS ON RAILROADS , 1983 .

[3]  Erhan Erkut,et al.  The cost and risk impacts of rerouting railroad shipments of hazardous materials. , 2007, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[4]  David Y. Jeong,et al.  IMPROVED TANK CAR SAFETY RESEARCH , 2007 .

[5]  Daniel C Smith,et al.  Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration , 2009 .

[6]  Christopher P. L. Barkan,et al.  BENEFIT-COST EVALUATION OF USING DIFFERENT SPECIFICATION TANK CARS TO REDUCE THE RISK OF TRANSPORTING ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE CHEMICALS , 1991 .

[7]  Vedat Verter,et al.  Chapter 9 Hazardous Materials Transportation , 2007, Transportation.

[8]  M. Morris Understanding Risk - Informing Decisions in a Democratic Society , 1997 .

[9]  Stefano Giordani,et al.  Finding minimum and equitable risk routes for hazmat shipments , 2007, Comput. Oper. Res..

[10]  Roger Lovegrove,et al.  Risk Assessment and Risk Communication in Civil Engineering , 2001 .

[11]  C. Tyler Dick,et al.  Railroad Derailment Factors Affecting Hazardous Materials Transportation Risk , 2003 .

[12]  Christopher P L Barkan,et al.  Improving the design of higher-capacity railway tank cars for hazardous materials transport: optimizing the trade-off between weight and safety. , 2008, Journal of hazardous materials.

[13]  Pooja Anand Cost -Effectiveness of Reducing Environmental Risk From Railroad Tank Car Transportation of Hazardous Materials , 2006 .

[14]  Christopher P. L. Barkan,et al.  Railroad Accident Rates for Use in Transportation Risk Analysis , 2004 .

[15]  Satish V. Ukkusuri,et al.  Optimizing the design of railway tank cars to minimize accident-caused releases , 2007, Comput. Oper. Res..

[16]  Vedat Verter,et al.  Hazardous materials transportation , 2011 .

[17]  Christopher P. L. Barkan,et al.  Effects of Route Rationalization on Hazardous Materials Transportation Risk , 2008 .

[18]  Christopher P. L. Barkan,et al.  The Effect of Rerouting and Tank Car Safety Design on the Risk of Rail Transport of Hazardous Materials , 2006 .

[19]  Daniel A. Crowl,et al.  Chemical Process Safety , 1990 .

[20]  R. Keeney,et al.  Improving risk communication. , 1986, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[21]  Stanley S. Grossel,et al.  Guidelines for Risk Based Process Safety, AIChE Center for Chemical Process Safety. Wiley-AIChE, New York (2007), 768pp., $150.00, ISBN: 978-0-470-16569-0 , 2008 .

[22]  William E McConnaughey,et al.  HAZARDOUS MATERIALS TRANSPORTATION , 1970 .

[23]  A. J. Policastro,et al.  Development of the table of initial isolation and protective action distances for the 2000 Emergency Response Guidebook. , 2001 .

[24]  William A. Wallace,et al.  Operational Risk Management: The Integration of Decision, Communications, and Multimedia Technologies , 1998 .

[25]  William E. Dunn,et al.  Application of a quantitative risk assessment method to emergency response planning , 2007, Comput. Oper. Res..

[26]  Theodore S. Glickman REROUTING RAILROAD SHIPMENTS OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS TO AVOID POPULATED AREAS , 1983 .

[27]  George F. List,et al.  Critical Issues in Safe Transport of Hazardous Materials , 1989 .

[28]  Yanfeng Ouyang,et al.  Optimal Locations of Railroad Wayside Defect Detection Installations , 2009, Comput. Aided Civ. Infrastructure Eng..

[29]  Mohd Rapik Saat,et al.  Release Risk and Optimization of Railroad Tank Car Safety Design , 2005 .