Significance of GPR polarisation for improving target detection and characterisation

This paper focuses on the application of ground penetrating radar (GPR) technique for civil engineering purposes, addressing the issues related to wave polarisation and antennas geometry. Even if polarisation of GPR signal is often an underestimated feature during data analysis and post processing, detection or avoidance of a specific target can be managed handling its polarimetric response. This opportunity is of high importance in this field of application, where the mixture of target with different polarimetric response is a commonly encountered situation. To provide an insight of this, two multicomponent GPR surveys have been performed: a first survey to show the effect of antenna-target mutual alignment variation and a second experiment in which the benefits of acquiring with different antenna arrangements are clearly evident. Because each antenna arrangement is sensitive towards different features of the received wavefield, this strategy is able to discriminate targets depending on their geometrical shape, thus delivering better detailed image of the acquired area.

[1]  Attilio Pizzigoni,et al.  Collapse behaviour in reciprocal frame structures , 2013 .

[2]  Maurizio Lualdi.  TRUE 3D Acquisition using GPR over small areas: A cost effective solution , 2011 .

[3]  Hyoung-sun Youn,et al.  Advanced classification of UXO using fully polarimetric GPR and frequency-polarization features , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium.

[4]  Keith D. Paulsen,et al.  Scattering from a metallic object embedded near the randomly rough surface of a lossy dielectric , 1996, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[5]  Antonella Saisi,et al.  Investigation On Structures And MaterialsOf The Castle Of Avio (Trento, Italy) , 2005 .

[6]  Jeroen Groenenboom,et al.  Multicomponent imaging of different objects with different strike orientations , 2002, International Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar.

[7]  M. Lualdi,et al.  2D and 3D experiments to explore the potential benefit of GPR investigations in planning the mining activity of a limestone quarry , 2004, Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Grounds Penetrating Radar, 2004. GPR 2004..

[8]  J. Daniels,et al.  Ground penetrating radar polarization and scattering from cylinders , 2000 .

[9]  Urs Böniger,et al.  Subsurface Utility Extraction and Characterization: Combining GPR Symmetry and Polarization Attributes , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[10]  Jakob B. U. Haldorsen,et al.  Imaging radar maps underground objects in 3-D , 2000 .

[11]  Jin Wu,et al.  GPR detection of several common subsurface voids inside dikes and dams , 2010 .

[12]  Antonella Saisi,et al.  Radar investigation as a complementary tool for the diagnosis of historic masonry buildings , 2011 .

[13]  Marshall C. Yovits,et al.  Ohio State University , 1974, SGAR.

[14]  Marco Valente.  Seismic Performance Assessment of a Non-Ductile RC Building Retrofitted by Steel Bracing or Fiber-Reinforced Polymers , 2012 .

[15]  Luigi Zanzi,et al.  Testing a safe acquisition procedure for an effective application of GPR to security operations , 2005 .

[16]  Mrinal K. Sen,et al.  Vertical fracture detection by exploiting the polarization properties of ground-penetrating radar signals , 2004 .

[17]  Chi-Chih Chen,et al.  Ultrawide-bandwidth fully-polarimetric ground penetrating radar classification of subsurface unexploded ordnance , 2001, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[18]  P. M. van den Berg,et al.  Three-dimensional imaging of multicomponent ground-penetrating radar data , 2003 .

[19]  Luigi Zanzi,et al.  A 3D GPR survey methodology for archeological applications , 2006 .

[20]  Marco Valente.  Seismic Strengthening of Non-Ductile R/C Structures Using Infill Wall or Ductile Steel Bracing , 2012 .

[21]  Almendra Villela,et al.  Invariant properties and rotation transformations of the GPR scattering matrix , 2013 .

[22]  J. Daniels,et al.  Analysis of GPR Polarization Phenomena , 1996 .

[23]  Erich D. Guy,et al.  SIGNIFICANCE OF CROSSED-DIPOLE ANTENNAS FOR HIGH NOISE ENVIRONMENTS , 2000 .

[24]  Jan Van der Kruk,et al.  Accurate Imaging of Multicomponent GPR Data Based on Exact Radiation Patterns , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[25]  Antonella Saisi,et al.  Investigation strategies for the diagnosis of historic structures: on-site tests on Avio Castle, Italy, and Pišece Castle, Slovenia , 2008 .

[26]  Mark Vendl,et al.  Demonstration of using crossed dipole GPR antennae for site characterization , 1999 .

[27]  Erich D. Guy,et al.  Pitfalls in GPR data interpretation: Differentiating stratigraphy and buried objects from periodic antenna and target effects , 2000 .

[28]  Franco Bontempi,et al.  Genetic algorithm optimization of precast hollow core slabs , 2014 .

[29]  Petr Beckmann,et al.  The Depolarization of Electromagnetic Waves , 1972 .

[30]  Johannes Hugenschmidt,et al.  GPR inspection of concrete bridges , 2006 .

[31]  Luigi Zanzi,et al.  GPR investigations to reconstruct the geometry of the wooden structures in historical buildings , 2002, International Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar.

[32]  Paola Condoleo,et al.  The use of georadar to assess damage to a masonry Bell Tower in Cremona, Italy , 2005 .

[33]  A. P. Annan,et al.  Application of GPR to map concrete to delineate embedded structural elements and defects , 2002, International Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar.

[34]  Federico Lombardi,et al.  Orthogonal polarization approach for three dimensional georadar surveys , 2013 .

[35]  R. Bansal,et al.  Antenna theory; analysis and design , 1984, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[36]  C. Balanis.  Advanced Engineering Electromagnetics , 1989 .

[37]  Lucian Wielopolski,et al.  3D Gpr Polarization Analysis For Imaging Complex Objects , 2003 .