Modelling approach in cell/material interactions studies.

Based on our experiments, we propose a statistical modeling approach of the in vitro interactions between biological objects and materials. The objective of this paper is to provide basic principles for developing more ambitious experiments comparing the simultaneous influence of more than one or two parameters on various observations, taking advantage of convenient statistical and mathematical techniques for the treatment of measured data. Analyzing some examples of our own experiments, the essential features needed for modeling cell/material interaction studies are presented. Firstly, we describe the initial process of designing appropriate experiments that allow for comprehensive modeling. In the second part, we illustrate the different applications of a specific statistical modeling technique, the bootstrap protocol, on either the amplification of data, the elimination of correlation existing between measured parameters or, out of a set of parameters, identification of the most relevant parameter for further statistical analysis. Finally, based on recent statistical analysis tools such as the bootstrap, we illustrate the relative influence of biological and physical parameters in phenomenological studies of cell/material interactions.

[1]  U. Joos,et al.  Ultrastructural characterization of the implant/bone interface of immediately loaded dental implants. , 2004, Biomaterials.

[2]  Maxence Bigerelle,et al.  The relative influence of the topography and chemistry of TiAl6V4 surfaces on osteoblastic cell behaviour. , 2000, Biomaterials.

[3]  Maxence Bigerelle,et al.  Qualitative and quantitative study of human osteoblast adhesion on materials with various surface roughnesses. , 2000, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[4]  Maxence Bigerelle,et al.  Topography effects of pure titanium substrates on human osteoblast long-term adhesion. , 2005, Acta biomaterialia.

[5]  D. Callens,et al.  Cells under stress: a non-destructive evaluation of adhesion by ultrasounds. , 2002, Biomolecular engineering.

[6]  H. M. Kim,et al.  The effect of alkali- and heat-treated titanium and apatite-formed titanium on osteoblastic differentiation of bone marrow cells. , 2000, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[7]  Maxence Bigerelle,et al.  A kinetic approach to osteoblast adhesion on biomaterial surface. , 2005, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[8]  B D Boyan,et al.  Effect of titanium surface roughness on proliferation, differentiation, and protein synthesis of human osteoblast-like cells (MG63). , 1995, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[9]  S. Suresh,et al.  Cell and molecular mechanics of biological materials , 2003, Nature materials.

[10]  J. Blum,et al.  Differential response of human osteoblast-like cells to commercially pure (cp) titanium grades 1 and 4. , 1999, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[11]  P. Good Permutation, Parametric, and Bootstrap Tests of Hypotheses , 2005 .

[12]  J C Keller,et al.  Optimization of surface micromorphology for enhanced osteoblast responses in vitro. , 1993, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[13]  Maxence Bigerelle,et al.  Effect of grooved titanium substratum on human osteoblastic cell growth. , 2002, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[14]  J. Amédée,et al.  Effect of surface roughness of the titanium alloy Ti-6Al-4V on human bone marrow cell response and on protein adsorption. , 2001, Biomaterials.

[15]  Maxence Bigerelle,et al.  Statistical correlation between cell adhesion and proliferation on biocompatible metallic materials. , 2005, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[16]  J. Jacobs,et al.  Evaluation of metallic and polymeric biomaterial surface energy and surface roughness characteristics for directed cell adhesion. , 2001, Tissue engineering.

[17]  S. Downes,et al.  Effects of surface-treated cpTi and Ti6Al4V alloy on the initial attachment of human osteoblast cells , 1999, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.

[18]  M. Beloti,et al.  Rat bone marrow cell response to titanium and titanium alloy with different surface roughness. , 2003, Clinical oral implants research.

[19]  R. Tuan,et al.  Surface composition of orthopaedic implant metals regulates cell attachment, spreading, and cytoskeletal organization of primary human osteoblasts in vitro. , 1994, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[20]  James D. Murray Mathematical Biology: I. An Introduction , 2007 .

[21]  C. Stanford,et al.  Characterizations of titanium implant surfaces. III. , 1994, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[22]  T. Lee,et al.  Attachment and proliferation of neonatal rat calvarial osteoblasts on Ti6Al4V: effect of surface chemistries of the alloy. , 2004, Biomaterials.

[23]  P S Walker,et al.  Attachment and proliferation of osteoblasts and fibroblasts on biomaterials for orthopaedic use. , 1995, Biomaterials.

[24]  A. Rezania,et al.  The detachment strength and morphology of bone cells contacting materials modified with a peptide sequence found within bone sialoprotein. , 1997, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[25]  P. Campbell,et al.  Variation in surface texture measurements. , 2004, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials.

[26]  C. Stanford,et al.  Effects of Implant Microtopography on Osteoblast Cell Attachment , 2003, Implant dentistry.

[27]  Maxence Bigerelle,et al.  Improvement in the morphology of Ti-based surfaces: a new process to increase in vitro human osteoblast response. , 2002, Biomaterials.

[28]  J. Wroblewski,et al.  Effects of titanium surfaces blasted with TiO2 particles on the initial attachment of cells derived from human mandibular bone. A scanning electron microscopic and histomorphometric analysis. , 2000, Clinical oral implants research.

[29]  P Bongrand,et al.  Cell fitting to adhesive surfaces: A prerequisite to firm attachment and subsequent events. , 2002, European cells & materials.

[30]  Robert Tibshirani,et al.  An Introduction to the Bootstrap , 1994 .

[31]  David J. Whitehouse,et al.  Handbook of Surface and Nanometrology , 2002 .

[32]  C. Lohmann,et al.  Response of MG63 osteoblast-like cells to titanium and titanium alloy is dependent on surface roughness and composition. , 1998, Biomaterials.

[33]  K. Anselme,et al.  Osteoblast adhesion on biomaterials. , 2000, Biomaterials.

[34]  O. Thoumine,et al.  Critical centrifugal forces induce adhesion rupture or structural reorganization in cultured cells. , 1996, Cell motility and the cytoskeleton.

[35]  A. Iost,et al.  Calcul de la dimension fractale d'un profil par la méthode des autocorrélations moyennées normées (AMN) , 1996 .

[36]  K G Vogel,et al.  Effects of hyaluronidase, trypsin, and EDTA on surface composition and topography during detachment of cells in culture. , 1978, Experimental cell research.

[37]  A. Yamamoto,et al.  A new technique for direct measurement of the shear force necessary to detach a cell from a material. , 1998, Biomaterials.

[38]  B. Bowerman Statistical Design and Analysis of Experiments, with Applications to Engineering and Science , 1989 .

[39]  T. Lee,et al.  The cell attachment and morphology of neonatal rat calvarial osteoblasts on the surface of Ti-6Al-4V and plasma-sprayed HA coating: Effect of surface roughness and serum contents , 2002, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.

[40]  Andrés J. García,et al.  Stick and grip , 2007, Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics.

[41]  P Ducheyne,et al.  Quantification of cell adhesion using a spinning disc device and application to surface-reactive materials. , 1997, Biomaterials.

[42]  Maxence Bigerelle,et al.  Relevance of roughness parameters for describing and modelling machined surfaces , 2003 .

[43]  Xiaolong Zhu,et al.  Effect of hydrothermally treated anodic oxide films on osteoblast attachment and proliferation. , 2003, Biomaterials.

[44]  D R McKenzie,et al.  Effect of ion modification of commonly used orthopedic materials on the attachment of human bone-derived cells. , 1999, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[45]  B. Manly Randomization, Bootstrap and Monte Carlo Methods in Biology , 2018 .

[46]  C. Lohmann,et al.  Response of MG63 osteoblast-like cells to titanium and titanium alloy is dependent on surface roughness and composition. , 1998, Biomaterials.

[47]  R. Tuan,et al.  Testing of Skeletal Implant Surfaces With Human Fetal Osteoblasts , 2002, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[48]  Maxence Bigerelle,et al.  Bootstrap analysis of the relation between initial adhesive events and long-term cellular functions of human osteoblasts cultured on biocompatible metallic substrates. , 2005, Acta biomaterialia.

[49]  A Wennerberg,et al.  Determining optimal surface roughness of TiO(2) blasted titanium implant material for attachment, proliferation and differentiation of cells derived from human mandibular alveolar bone. , 2001, Clinical oral implants research.

[50]  U. Joos,et al.  Basic reactions of osteoblasts on structured material surfaces. , 2005, European cells & materials.

[51]  John A. Nelder,et al.  A Simplex Method for Function Minimization , 1965, Comput. J..

[52]  J. Jansen,et al.  Integrins as linker proteins between osteoblasts and bone replacing materials. A critical review. , 2005, Biomaterials.

[53]  Maxence Bigerelle,et al.  An unscaled parameter to measure the order of surfaces: a new surface elaboration to increase cells adhesion. , 2002, Biomolecular engineering.

[54]  P. D. Carvalho,et al.  Response of rat bone marrow cells to commercially pure titanium submitted to different surface treatments. , 2003, Journal of dentistry.