An Evolving Design Framework for Game-Based Learning Platforms

In this concluding chapter, we discuss an evolving, experiential design framework for game-based learning platforms, by synthesizing the salient design problem-solving events, experiences, and solution-exploration findings reported in the previous chapters. It is not aimed to be prescriptive or exhaustive, but acts as a starting point for specifying the structuring and important concepts of the interdisciplinary design of game-based learning. Results of our phenomenological inquiry assert that solving a game design problem is mainly about problem structuring or transforming an indeterministic problem space to partially limited. The structuring of the interdisciplinary design of game-based learning platforms consists of three norms: (a) transformation of the design goals into functional specifications of the design artifact, (b) coevolution of the problem and solution spaces as well as exploration and syntheses of partial solution of the subproblems, and (c) use of a common symbol (or representation) system to communicate and focus information while augmenting collective memory and processing.

[1]  Julian Togelius,et al.  An experiment in automatic game design , 2008, 2008 IEEE Symposium On Computational Intelligence and Games.

[2]  Trudie Aberdeen Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. , 2013, The Canadian Journal of Action Research.

[3]  Herre van Oostendorp,et al.  A meta-analytic review of the role of instructional support in game-based learning , 2013, Comput. Educ..

[4]  Kuo-En Chang,et al.  Embedding game-based problem-solving phase into problem-posing system for mathematics learning , 2012, Comput. Educ..

[5]  Nigel Cross,et al.  Creativity in the design process: co-evolution of problem–solution , 2001 .

[6]  Shaaron E. Ainsworth,et al.  Endogenous fantasy and learning in digital games , 2015 .

[7]  Sumit Gulwani,et al.  Automatic Game Progression Design through Analysis of Solution Features , 2015, CHI.

[8]  Christopher Alexander Notes on the Synthesis of Form , 1964 .

[9]  David C. Brown,et al.  Design Problem Solving: Knowledge Structures and Control Strategies , 1989 .

[10]  Chris Dede,et al.  Immersive Interfaces for Engagement and Learning , 2009, Science.

[11]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The Structure of Ill Structured Problems , 1973, Artif. Intell..

[12]  Chris Dede,et al.  Applying Motivation Theory to the Design of Game-Based Learning Environments , 2015 .

[13]  Thomas W. Malone,et al.  Toward a Theory of Intrinsically Motivating Instruction , 1981, Cogn. Sci..

[14]  Fengfeng Ke,et al.  Designing and integrating purposeful learning in game play: a systematic review , 2015, Educational Technology Research and Development.

[15]  Philippe Pasquier,et al.  Towards a Generic Framework for Automated Video Game Level Creation , 2010, EvoApplications.

[16]  Michael Mateas,et al.  Towards Automated Game Design , 2007, AI*IA.