Innovation, licensing, and price vs. quantity competition

In this paper, we develop a differentiated duopoly model with endogenous cost-reducing R&D and review the argument on welfare effect of price and quantity competition in the presence of technology licensing. We show that, with licensing, the standard conclusion on duopoly (Singh and Vives, 1984) is completely reversed. Cournot competition induces lower R&D investment than Bertrand competition does. Moreover, Cournot competition leads to lower prices, lower industry profit, higher consumer surplus and higher social welfare than Bertrand competition.

[1]  Jeremy Howells,et al.  New Directions in R&D: Current and Prospective Challenges , 2008 .

[2]  Juan Song,et al.  Technology licensing in a vertically differentiated duopoly , 2009 .

[3]  Licensing to a durable-good monopoly , 2008 .

[4]  X. Wang,et al.  Fee versus royalty licensing in a Cournot duopoly model , 1998 .

[5]  Ping Lin,et al.  Product differentiation, process R&D, and the nature of market competition , 2002 .

[6]  X. Vives,et al.  Price and quantity competition in a differentiated duopoly , 1984 .

[7]  P. Lin.  Fixed-Fee Licensing of Innovations and Collusion , 1996 .

[8]  J. Sandonís,et al.  To Merge or to License: Implications for Competition Policy , 2001 .

[9]  Larry D. Qiu.  On the Dynamic Efficiency of Bertrand and Cournot Equilibria , 1997 .

[10]  Competition and Welfare: The Implications of Licensing , 2010 .

[11]  A. Mukherjee.  Innovation, Licensing and Welfare , 2002 .

[12]  Massimo Motta,et al.  Endogenous Quality Choice: Price vs. Quantity Competition , 1993 .

[13]  Debappiya Sen,et al.  Subsidy in Licensing: Optimality and Welfare Implications , 2005 .

[14]  Yair Tauman,et al.  Patent Licensing: The Inside Story , 2002 .

[15]  Ramon Faulí-Oller,et al.  Welfare reducing licensing , 2002, Games Econ. Behav..

[16]  Tarun Kabiraj.  Patent Licensing in a Leadership Structure , 2004 .

[17]  George Symeonidis,et al.  Comparing Cournot and Bertrand Equilibria in a Differentiated Duopoly with Product R&D , 2003 .

[18]  Y. Tauman,et al.  Fees Versus Royalties and the Private Value of a Patent , 1986 .

[19]  J. Tirole.  The Theory of Industrial Organization , 1988 .

[20]  Piercarlo Zanchettin,et al.  Differentiated Duopoly with Asymmetric Costs , 2006 .

[21]  Tarun Kabiraj.  Technology Transfer in a Stackelberg Structure: Licensing Contracts and Welfare , 2005 .

[22]  S. Poddar,et al.  On Patent Licensing in Spatial Competition , 2004 .

[23]  A. Mukherjee,et al.  Foreign Competition with Licensing , 2005 .

[24]  Anil Arya,et al.  Outsourcing, vertical integration, and price vs. quantity competition☆ , 2008 .

[25]  Michael L. Katz,et al.  On the licensing of innovations , 1985 .

[26]  Helmut Bester,et al.  The Incentives for Cost Reduction in a Differentiated Industry , 1991 .

[27]  Jonas Häckner,et al.  A Note on Price and Quantity Competition in Differentiated Oligopolies , 2000, J. Econ. Theory.

[28]  N. Erkal,et al.  Optimal Licensing Policy in Differentiated Industries , 2005 .