The AD8

Background: Brief measures that accurately discriminate normal cognitive aging from very mild dementia are lacking. Cognitive tests often are insensitive to very mild dementia. Informant-based measures may be more sensitive in detecting early dementia. Objective: To identify informant-reported clinical variables that differentiate cognitively normal individuals from those with very mild dementia. Methods: A 55-item battery of informant queries regarding an individual's cognitive status was derived from a semistructured interview and a consensus panel of dementia experts. The battery was evaluated with informants for 189 consecutive participants of a longitudinal study of memory and aging and compared with an independently obtained Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) score for the participant. Multiple regression and receiver operator characteristic curves assessed subsets of the items to discriminate between CDR 0 (no dementia) and CDR 0.5 (very mild dementia). Results: The final version (AD8) querying memory, orientation, judgment, and function was administered to an additional sample of 112 CDR 0 and 68 CDR 0.5 participants. Using a cut-off of two items endorsed, the area under the curve was 0.834, suggesting good to excellent discrimination, sensitivity was 74%, and specificity was 86% (prevalence of 0.38 for very mild dementia). Inclusion of 56 additional individuals with mild to severe dementia (increasing dementia prevalence to 0.53) increased sensitivity to 85%. Conclusions: The AD8 is a brief, sensitive measure that reliably differentiates between nondemented and demented individuals. Use of the AD8 in conjunction with a brief assessment of the participant could improve diagnostic accuracy in general practice.

[1]  Ian Philp,et al.  Screening for cognitive impairment among older people in black and minority ethnic groups. , 2004, Age and ageing.

[2]  Hiroshi Moriwaki,et al.  Usefulness of a cube-copying test in outpatients with dementia , 2004, Brain injury.

[3]  Anthony F Jorm The Informant Questionnaire on Cognitive Decline in the Elderly (IQCODE): a review , 2004, International Psychogeriatrics.

[4]  A. Iguchi,et al.  The Clock Drawing Test as a Valid Screening Method for Mild Cognitive Impairment , 2004, Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders.

[5]  D. Royall,et al.  Misclassification Is Likely in the Assessment of Mild Cognitive Impairment , 2004, Neuroepidemiology.

[6]  Linda Boise,et al.  Dementia assessment in primary care: results from a study in three managed care systems. , 2004, The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences.

[7]  J. Morris,et al.  CLINICIAN BELIEFS AND PRACTICES IN DEMENTIA CARE: IMPLICATIONS FOR HEALTH EDUCATORS , 2004 .

[8]  R. Palmer,et al.  Evaluation of the Mini‐Mental State Examination's Internal Consistency in a Community‐Based Sample of Mexican‐American and European‐American Elders: Results from the San Antonio Longitudinal Study of Aging , 2004, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[9]  D. Basic,et al.  The Rowland Universal Dementia Assessment Scale (RUDAS): a multicultural cognitive assessment scale , 2004, International Psychogeriatrics.

[10]  J. Grace,et al.  Validity of Informant Reports About AD and MCI Patients’ Memory , 2004, Alzheimer disease and associated disorders.

[11]  D. Fujii,et al.  Dementia screening: can a second administration reduce the number of false positives? , 2003, The American journal of geriatric psychiatry : official journal of the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry.

[12]  N. Herrmann,et al.  Contribution of Informant and Patient Ratings to the Accuracy of the Mini‐Mental State Examination in Predicting Probable Alzheimer's Disease , 2003, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[13]  V. Buckles,et al.  Accuracy of Collateral Source Reports in Very Mild to Mild Dementia of the Alzheimer Type , 2003, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[14]  S. Borson,et al.  Brief Screening Tests for Dementia , 2002, Canadian journal of psychiatry. Revue canadienne de psychiatrie.

[15]  J. Miller,et al.  The clock drawing test is a poor screen for very mild dementia , 2002, Neurology.

[16]  H. Buschke,et al.  Screening for Alzheimer's Disease: The Memory Impairment Screen Versus the Conventional Three‐Word Memory Test , 2002, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[17]  H. Brodaty,et al.  The GPCOG: A New Screening Test for Dementia Designed for General Practice , 2002, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[18]  J. Morris,et al.  Current concepts in mild cognitive impairment. , 2001, Archives of neurology.

[19]  D. Lanska The value of informant versus individual’s complaints of memory impairment in early dementia , 2001, Neurology.

[20]  J. Hennen,et al.  A pilot program of improved methods for community-based screening for dementia. , 2001, The American journal of geriatric psychiatry : official journal of the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry.

[21]  M Hopman-Rock,et al.  International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry Development and Validation of the Observation List for Early Signs of Dementia (old) , 2022 .

[22]  J. Price,et al.  Mild cognitive impairment represents early-stage Alzheimer disease. , 2001, Archives of neurology.

[23]  A. Korten,et al.  Informant ratings of cognitive decline in old age: validation against change on cognitive tests over 7 to 8 years , 2000, Psychological Medicine.

[24]  C. MacKnight,et al.  Interrater Reliability of the Clinical Dementia Rating in a Multicenter Trial , 2000, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[25]  R. Jacoby,et al.  Can an informant questionnaire be used to predict the development of dementia in medical inpatients? , 1999, International journal of geriatric psychiatry.

[26]  L. Boise,et al.  Diagnosing dementia: perspectives of primary care physicians. , 1999, The Gerontologist.

[27]  J. Price,et al.  Clinicopathologic studies in cognitively healthy aging and Alzheimer's disease: relation of histologic markers to dementia severity, age, sex, and apolipoprotein E genotype. , 1998, Archives of neurology.

[28]  K. Kosaka,et al.  Consensus guidelines for the clinical and pathologic diagnosis of dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) , 1996, Neurology.

[29]  S. Finkel,et al.  Treating Alzheimer's and Other Dementias , 1995 .

[30]  J. Morris The Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) , 1993, Neurology.

[31]  J. Rabe-Jabłońska,et al.  [Affective disorders in the fourth edition of the classification of mental disorders prepared by the American Psychiatric Association -- diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders]. , 1993, Psychiatria polska.

[32]  L. Berg,et al.  Clinical Dementia Rating , 1984, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[33]  M. Folstein,et al.  Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease , 1984, Neurology.

[34]  R. Katzman.,et al.  Validation of a short Orientation-Memory-Concentration Test of cognitive impairment. , 1983, The American journal of psychiatry.

[35]  C. P. Hughes,et al.  Mild senile dementia of Alzheimer type: research diagnostic criteria, recruitment, and description of a study population. , 1982, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[36]  S. Folstein,et al.  "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. , 1975, Journal of psychiatric research.

[37]  K. Jellinger,et al.  Consensus guidelines for the clinical and pathologic diagnosis of dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB): report of the consortium on DLB international workshop. , 1996, Neurology.

[38]  L. Berg Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR). , 1988, Psychopharmacology bulletin.