Perceptual objects capture attention

A recent study has demonstrated that the mere organization of some elements in the visual field into an object attracts attention automatically [Kimchi, R., Yeshurun, Y., & Cohen-Savransky, A. (2007). Automatic, stimulus-driven attentional capture by objecthood. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14(1), 166-172]. We tested whether similar results will emerge when the target is not a part of the object and with simplified task demands. A matrix of 16 black L elements in various orientations preceded the presentation of a Vernier target. The target was either added to the matrix (Experiment 1), or appeared after its offset (Experiment 2). On some trials four elements formed a square-like object, and on some of these trials the target appeared in the center of the object. No featural uniqueness or abrupt onset was associated with the object and it did not predict the target location or the direction of the target's horizontal offset. Performance was better when the target appeared in the center of the object than in a different location than the object, even when the target appeared after the matrix offset. These findings support the hypothesis that a perceptual object captures attention (Kimchi et al., 2007), and demonstrate that this automatic deployment of attention to the object is robust and involves a spatial component.

[1]  J. Driver,et al.  Segmentation, attention and phenomenal visual objects , 2001, Cognition.

[2]  G. Baylis,et al.  Visual parsing and response competition: The effect of grouping factors , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[3]  I. Rock,et al.  Perceptual organization and attention , 1992, Cognitive Psychology.

[4]  N Weisstein,et al.  A new perceptual context-superiority effect: line segments are more visible against a figure than against a ground. , 1982, Science.

[5]  S. Vecera,et al.  The return of object-based attention: Selection of multiple-region objects , 2006, Perception & psychophysics.

[6]  R. Zemel,et al.  Object-Based Attention and Occlusion Evidence From Normal Participants and a Computational Model , 1998 .

[7]  Jon Driver,et al.  Spreading of Visual Attention to Modally Versus Amodally Completed Regions , 1997 .

[8]  G. Baylis,et al.  Visual attention and objects: evidence for hierarchical coding of location. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[9]  D. Sagi,et al.  Top-Down Modulation of Lateral Interactions in Early Vision Does Attention Affect Integration of the Whole or Just Perception of the Parts? , 2003, Current Biology.

[10]  C. Koch,et al.  A saliency-based search mechanism for overt and covert shifts of visual attention , 2000, Vision Research.

[11]  G. Baylis,et al.  Movement and visual attention: the spotlight metaphor breaks down. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[12]  Steven A. Hillyard,et al.  Objects Are Highlighted by Spatial Attention , 2006 .

[13]  A. Kramer,et al.  Perceptual organization and focused attention: The role of objects and proximity in visual processing , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[14]  Antígona Martínez,et al.  Spatial attention facilitates selection of illusory objects: Evidence from event-related brain potentials , 2007, Brain Research.

[15]  A F Kramer,et al.  Object-based attentional selection--grouped arrays or spatially invariant representations?: comment on vecera and Farah (1994). , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[16]  Stephen M. Rao,et al.  Neural Mechanisms of Visual Attention: Object-Based Selection of a Region in Space , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[17]  Shaun P. Vecera,et al.  Toward a Biased Competition Account of Object-Based Segregation and Attention , 2000 .

[18]  Christof Koch,et al.  A Model of Saliency-Based Visual Attention for Rapid Scene Analysis , 2009 .

[19]  Steven A. Hillyard,et al.  The Role of Spatial Attention in the Selection of Real and Illusory Objects , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[20]  Marcus Womersley,et al.  A contextual effect in feature detection with application of signal detection methodology , 1977 .

[21]  Jon Driver,et al.  Edge-Assignment and Figure–Ground Segmentation in Short-Term Visual Matching , 1996, Cognitive Psychology.

[22]  Brian J. Scholl,et al.  The role of closure in defining the “objects” of object-based attention , 2005 .

[23]  John J. Foxe,et al.  Kanizsa subjective figures capture visual spatial attention: evidence from electrophysiological and behavioral data , 2005, Neuropsychologia.

[24]  I Kovács,et al.  A closed curve is much more than an incomplete one: effect of closure in figure-ground segmentation. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  Morris Goldsmith,et al.  Modulation of object-based attention by spatial focus under endogenous and exogenous orienting. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[26]  M. Farah,et al.  Does visual attention select objects or locations? , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[27]  Christof Koch,et al.  Modeling attention to salient proto-objects , 2006, Neural Networks.

[28]  Anastasia V. Flevaris,et al.  Exogenous Spatial Attention Influences Figure-Ground Assignment , 2004 .

[29]  Joseph Krummenacher,et al.  Attention and Visual Object Segmentation , 2004 .

[30]  Jon Driver,et al.  Lateral interactions between targets and flankers in low-level vision depend on attention to the flankers , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[31]  R. Kimchi,et al.  Perceptual grouping and attention: Not all groupings are equal , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[32]  J. Duncan.  Selective attention and the organization of visual information. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[33]  Min-Shik Kim,et al.  Perceptual grouping via spatial selection in a focused-attention task , 2001, Vision Research.

[34]  Stephen E Palmer,et al.  Familiar shapes attract attention in figure-ground displays , 2007, Perception & psychophysics.

[35]  Barry D. Vaughan,et al.  Object-Based Visual Selection: Evidence From Perceptual Completion , 1998 .

[36]  R. Rafal,et al.  Shifting visual attention between objects and locations: evidence from normal and parietal lesion subjects. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[37]  Ruth Kimchi,et al.  Automatic, stimulus-driven attentional capture by objecthood , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[38]  A B Sekuler,et al.  The effects of occlusion and past experience on the allocation of object-based attention , 2001, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[39]  B. Scholl.  Objects and attention: the state of the art , 2001, Cognition.

[40]  J. Cohn,et al.  Dephosphorylation of ezrin as an early event in renal microvillar breakdown and anoxic injury. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[41]  B. Julesz,et al.  Context Superiority in a Detection Task with Line-Element Stimuli: A Low-Level Effect , 1990, Perception.

[42]  S. E. Watson,et al.  Object-based visual selective attention and perceptual organization , 1999, Perception & psychophysics.

[43]  J. Driver,et al.  New indirect measures of “inattentive” visual grouping in a change-detection task , 2005, Perception & psychophysics.

[44]  N Weisstein,et al.  Visual Detection of Line Segments: An Object-Superiority Effect , 1974, Science.