Application of influence diagrams to prostate intensity-modulated radiation therapy plan selection

The purpose is to incorporate clinically relevant factors such as patient-specific and dosimetric information as well as data from clinical trials in the decision-making process for the selection of prostate intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) plans. The approach is to incorporate the decision theoretic concept of an influence diagram into the solution of the multiobjective optimization inverse planning problem. A set of candidate IMRT plans was obtained by varying the importance factors for the planning target volume (PTV) and the organ-at-risk (OAR) in combination with simulated annealing to explore a large part of the solution space. The Pareto set for the PTV and OAR was analysed to demonstrate how the selection of the weighting factors influenced which part of the solution space was explored. An influence diagram based on a Bayesian network with 18 nodes was designed to model the decision process for plan selection. The model possessed nodes for clinical laboratory results, tumour grading, staging information, patient-specific information, dosimetric information, complications and survival statistics from clinical studies. A utility node was utilized for the decision-making process. The influence diagram successfully ranked the plans based on the available information. Sensitivity analyses were used to judge the reasonableness of the diagram and the results. In conclusion, influence diagrams lend themselves well to modelling the decision processes for IMRT plan selection. They provide an excellent means to incorporate the probabilistic nature of data and beliefs into one model. They also provide a means for introducing evidence-based medicine, in the form of results of clinical trials, into the decision-making process.

[1]  I J Kalet,et al.  Prism: a new approach to radiotherapy planning software. , 1996, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[2]  Yan Yu,et al.  Multi-objective optimization in radiotherapy: applications to stereotactic radiosurgery and prostate brachytherapy , 2000, Artif. Intell. Medicine.

[3]  T E Schultheiss,et al.  Models in radiotherapy: definition of decision criteria. , 1985, Medical physics.

[4]  D P Dearnaley,et al.  Improvements in target coverage and reduced spinal cord irradiation using intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in patients with carcinoma of the thyroid gland. , 2001, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[5]  C Clifton Ling,et al.  EUD but not QED. , 2002, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[6]  C. Ling,et al.  Risk group dependence of dose-response for biopsy outcome after three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy of prostate cancer. , 2002, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[7]  H. D. de Koning,et al.  Measuring disease specific quality of life in localized prostate cancer: The Dutch experience , 2003, Quality of Life Research.

[8]  M. Goitein,et al.  Tolerance of normal tissue to therapeutic irradiation. , 1991, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[9]  Peter Norvig,et al.  Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach , 1995 .

[10]  Ross D. Shachter,et al.  Representation and Analysis of Medical Decision Problems with Influence Diagrams , 1997, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[11]  S. Webb,et al.  Optimisation of radiotherapy for carcinoma of the parotid gland: a comparison of conventional, three-dimensional conformal, and intensity-modulated techniques. , 2001, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[12]  S. Sutlief,et al.  Optimization of intensity modulated beams with volume constraints using two methods: cost function minimization and projections onto convex sets. , 1998, Medical physics.

[13]  Olivier C.L. Haas.  Radiotherapy Treatment Planning , 1999 .

[14]  Steven L. Tanimoto.  The Elements of Artificial Intelligence Using Common Lisp , 1995 .

[15]  Steen Andreassen,et al.  Computer-Aided Electromyography and Expert Systems , 1989 .

[16]  Steve Webb,et al.  Elimination of importance factors for clinically accurate selection of beam orientations, beam weights and wedge angles in conformal radiation therapy. , 2003, Medical physics.

[17]  J. Galvin,et al.  An optimized forward-planning technique for intensity modulated radiation therapy. , 2000, Medical physics.

[18]  Pierre-Henri Wuillemin,et al.  Propagation in Bayesian Networks , 2001 .

[19]  D. Sackett,et al.  Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't , 1996, BMJ.

[20]  Tammy O. Tengs,et al.  One thousand health-related quality-of-life estimates. , 2000, Medical care.

[21]  Joseph O Deasy,et al.  The generalized equivalent uniform dose function as a basis for intensity-modulated treatment planning. , 2002, Physics in medicine and biology.

[22]  J. Myers,et al.  The INTERNIST-1/QUICK MEDICAL REFERENCE project--status report. , 1986, The Western journal of medicine.

[23]  M G Kahn,et al.  Objective evaluation of 3-D radiation treatment plans: a decision-analytic tool incorporating treatment preferences of radiation oncologists. , 1993, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[24]  A. Hanlon,et al.  Defining the optimal radiation dose with three‐dimensional conformal radiation therapy for patients with nonmetastatic prostate carcinoma by using recursive partitioning techniques , 2001, Cancer.

[25]  Steen Andreassen,et al.  A method for diagnosing multiple diseases in MUNIN , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[26]  R. Mohan,et al.  Multiple local minima in IMRT optimization based on dose-volume criteria. , 2002, Medical physics.

[27]  Judea Pearl,et al.  Probabilistic reasoning in intelligent systems - networks of plausible inference , 1991, Morgan Kaufmann series in representation and reasoning.

[28]  D K Owens,et al.  Use of Influence Diagrams to Structure Medical Decisions , 1997, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[29]  Q. Hou,et al.  An optimization algorithm for intensity modulated radiotherapy--the simulated dynamics with dose-volume constraints. , 2002, Medical physics.

[30]  A. Niemierko.  Reporting and analyzing dose distributions: a concept of equivalent uniform dose. , 1997, Medical physics.

[31]  D Baltas,et al.  A multiobjective gradient-based dose optimization algorithm for external beam conformal radiotherapy. , 2001, Physics in medicine and biology.

[32]  Horst W. Hamacher,et al.  A multicriteria optimization approach for inverse radiotherapy planning , 2000 .

[33]  Finn V. Jensen,et al.  Bayesian Networks and Decision Graphs , 2001, Statistics for Engineering and Information Science.

[34]  Radhe Mohan,et al.  A fast dose calculation method based on table lookup for IMRT optimization. , 2003, Physics in medicine and biology.

[35]  C. Burman,et al.  Calculation of complication probability factors for non-uniform normal tissue irradiation: the effective volume method. , 1989, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[36]  Ronald A. Howard,et al.  Knowledge Maps , 1989 .

[37]  Steve Webb,et al.  Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy , 1996, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[38]  A L Boyer,et al.  Optimization of importance factors in inverse planning. , 1999, Physics in medicine and biology.

[39]  Eva K. Lee,et al.  Operations research applied to radiotherapy, an NCI-NSF-sponsored workshop February 7-9, 2002. , 2003, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[40]  R Mohan,et al.  The potential for sparing of parotids and escalation of biologically effective dose with intensity-modulated radiation treatments of head and neck cancers: a treatment design study. , 2000, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[41]  Horst W. Hamacher,et al.  Inverse Radiation Therapy Planning: A Multiple Objective Optimisation Approach , 1999 .

[42]  G. A. Miller.  THE PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW THE MAGICAL NUMBER SEVEN, PLUS OR MINUS TWO: SOME LIMITS ON OUR CAPACITY FOR PROCESSING INFORMATION 1 , 1956 .

[43]  J. Lyman.  Complication Probability as Assessed from Dose-Volume Histograms , 1985 .

[44]  K. Burnham,et al.  Optimization of beam orientation in radiotherapy using planar geometry. , 1998, Physics in medicine and biology.

[45]  Eric Horvitz,et al.  AUTOMATED REASONING FOR BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE , 1999 .

[46]  M. Zaider,et al.  Physician/patient-driven risk assignment in radiation oncology: reality or fancy? , 1997, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[47]  D. Heckerman,et al.  Toward Normative Expert Systems: Part I The Pathfinder Project , 1992, Methods of Information in Medicine.

[48]  S Webb,et al.  A model for calculating tumour control probability in radiotherapy including the effects of inhomogeneous distributions of dose and clonogenic cell density. , 1993, Physics in medicine and biology.

[49]  Y. Yu,et al.  Multiobjective decision theory for computational optimization in radiation therapy. , 1997, Medical physics.