Numerical evaluation of voltage gradient constraints on electrokinetic injection of amendments

Abstract A new numerical model is presented that simulates groundwater flow and multi-species reactive transport under hydraulic and electrical gradients. Coupled into the existing, reactive transport model PHT3D, the model was verified against published analytical and experimental studies, and has applications in remediation cases where the geochemistry plays an important role. A promising method for remediation of low-permeability aquifers is the electrokinetic transport of amendments for in situ chemical oxidation. Numerical modelling showed that amendment injection resulted in the voltage gradient adjacent to the cathode decreasing below a linear gradient, producing a lower achievable concentration of the amendment in the medium. An analytical method is derived to estimate the achievable amendment concentration based on the inlet concentration. Even with low achievable concentrations, analysis showed that electrokinetic remediation is feasible due to its ability to deliver a significantly higher mass flux in low-permeability media than under a hydraulic gradient.

[1]  A. Alshawabkeh,et al.  Coupling of electrochemical and mechanical processes in soils under DC fields , 2004 .

[2]  Paul P. Wang,et al.  MT3DMS: A Modular Three-Dimensional Multispecies Transport Model for Simulation of Advection, Dispersion, and Chemical Reactions of Contaminants in Groundwater Systems; Documentation and User's Guide , 1999 .

[3]  Yalcin B. Acar,et al.  Electrokinetic Remediation. II: Theoretical Model , 1996 .

[4]  V. S. Tripathi,et al.  A critical evaluation of recent developments in hydrogeochemical transport models of reactive multichemical components , 1989 .

[5]  A. Crosato.  Effects of smoothing and regridding in numerical meander migration models , 2007 .

[6]  Christian D. Langevin,et al.  MODFLOW-2000, the U.S. Geological Survey Modular Ground-Water Model--Documentation of the SEAWAT-2000 Version with the Variable-Density Flow Process (VDF) and the Integrated MT3DMS Transport Process (IMT) , 2003 .

[7]  David E. Daniel,et al.  Diffusion in Saturated Soil. I: Background , 1991 .

[8]  S. Yun,et al.  Numerical and Experimental Studies on Cadmium (II) Transport in Kaolinite Clay under Electrical Fields , 2003 .

[9]  H. Prommer,et al.  Multicomponent reactive transport simulation of the Elder problem: Effects of chemical reactions on salt plume development , 2007 .

[10]  B. Popov,et al.  Mathematical Modeling of Hexavalent Chromium Decontamination from Low Surface Charged Soils , 1997 .

[11]  Henning Prommer,et al.  Modelling the fate of oxidisable organic contaminants in groundwater. In C. T. Miller, M. B. Parlange, and S. M. Hassanizadeh (editors), , 2002 .

[12]  A. Alshawabkeh.  Theoretical and Experimental Modeling of Removing Contaminants From Soils by an Electric Field. , 1994 .

[13]  A. L. Wood,et al.  Use of Electrophoresis for Transporting Nano‐Iron in Porous Media , 2011, Ground water.

[14]  G. Hoag,et al.  Sodium Persulfate Oxidation for the Remediation of Chlorinated Solvents (USEPA Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation Program) , 2006 .

[15]  D. A. Barry,et al.  MODFLOW/MT3DMS‐Based Reactive Multicomponent Transport Modeling , 2003, Ground water.

[16]  C. Liang,et al.  Potential for activated persulfate degradation of BTEX contamination. , 2008, Water research.

[17]  James K. Mitchell,et al.  Fundamentals of soil behavior , 1976 .

[18]  F. Stauffer,et al.  Modeling of chemically reactive groundwater transport , 1994 .

[19]  Ivars Neretnieks,et al.  Modelling of transport and reaction processes in a porous medium in an electrical field , 1996 .

[20]  Yalcin B. Acar,et al.  Electrokinetic Remediation. I: Pilot-Scale Tests with Lead-Spiked Kaolinite , 1996 .

[21]  M. Elektorowicz,et al.  Electrokinetic Supply of Nutrients in Soil Bioremediation , 1996 .

[22]  Albert T. Yeung,et al.  Practical Aspects of In-Situ Electrokinetic Extraction , 1999 .

[23]  Charles J. Newell,et al.  Performance of DNAPL Source Depletion Technologies at 59 Chlorinated Solvent‐Impacted Sites , 2006 .

[24]  A. Al-Hamdan,et al.  Electrokinetic Remediation Modeling Incorporating Geochemical Effects , 2008 .

[25]  L. Vane,et al.  Effect of aqueous phase properties on clay particle zeta potential and electro-osmotic permeability : Implications for electro-kinetic soil remediation processes , 1997 .

[26]  Melvin I. Esrig.  Pore Pressures, Consolidation, and Electrokinetics , 1968 .

[27]  I. Yusoff,et al.  Electrokinetic Migration of Permanganate Through Low‐Permeability Media , 2008, Ground water.

[28]  Yalcin B. Acar,et al.  Principles of electrokinetic remediation , 1993 .

[29]  V. Chevrier,et al.  Mineralogical characterization of acid weathered phyllosilicates with implications for secondary martian deposits , 2010 .

[30]  Beth L. Parker,et al.  Plume persistence due to aquitard back diffusion following dense nonaqueous phase liquid source removal or isolation , 2005 .

[31]  L. Shawn Matott,et al.  NIGHTHAWK - A program for modeling saturated batch and column experiments incorporating equilibrium and kinetic biogeochemistry , 2010, Comput. Geosci..

[32]  Electromigration of microbial electron acceptors and nutrients: (II) Transport in groundwater , 2008, Journal of environmental science and health. Part A, Toxic/hazardous substances & environmental engineering.

[33]  A. Yeung.  Contaminant Extractability by Electrokinetics , 2006 .

[34]  A. Fourie,et al.  Development of an apparatus for pH-isolated electrokinetic in situ chemical oxidation , 2011 .

[35]  S. Thevanayagam,et al.  Injection of nutrients and TEAs in clayey soils using electrokinetics , 1998 .

[36]  Benjamin G. Petri,et al.  In Situ Chemical Oxidation of Contaminated Soil and Groundwater Using Persulfate: A Review , 2010 .

[37]  Ronald F. Probstein,et al.  Removal of contaminants from saturated clay by electroosmosis , 1993 .

[38]  Arlen W. Harbaugh,et al.  MODFLOW-2000, The U.S. Geological Survey Modular Ground-Water Model - User Guide to Modularization Concepts and the Ground-Water Flow Process , 2000 .

[39]  E A Sudicky,et al.  Multicomponent simulation of wastewater-derived nitrogen and carbon in shallow unconfined aquifers. I. Model formulation and performance. , 2001, Journal of contaminant hydrology.

[40]  H. Prommer,et al.  Electrokinetic in situ oxidation remediation: assessment of parameter sensitivities and the influence of aquifer heterogeneity on remediation efficiency. , 2012, Journal of contaminant hydrology.

[41]  Yalcin B. Acar,et al.  ACID/BASE DISTRIBUTIONS IN ELECTROKINETIC SOIL PROCESSING , 1990 .

[42]  C. Appelo,et al.  Geochemical calculations and observations on salt water intrusions. II, Validation of a geochemical model with laboratory experiments , 1990 .

[43]  Krishna R. Reddy,et al.  Electrokinetically Enhanced Remediation of Hydrophobic Organic Compounds in Soils: A Review , 2005 .

[44]  A. Yeung,et al.  Fundamental formulation of electrokinetic extraction of contaminants from soil , 1996 .

[45]  B. Kueper,et al.  Numerical Examination of the Factors Controlling DNAPL Migration Through a Single Fracture , 2002, Ground water.

[46]  D. L. Parkhurst,et al.  User's guide to PHREEQC (Version 2)-a computer program for speciation, batch-reaction, one-dimensional transport, and inverse geochemical calculations , 1999 .

[47]  F. Nadim,et al.  Remediation of Soil and Ground Water Contaminated with PAH using Heat and Fe(II)-EDTA Catalyzed Persulfate Oxidation , 2006 .

[48]  P. Isosaari,et al.  Integration of electrokinetics and chemical oxidation for the remediation of creosote-contaminated clay. , 2007, Journal of hazardous materials.