Individuality, pluralism, and the phylogenetic species concept

[1]  M. Ruse.  Biological Species: Natural Kinds, Individuals, or What? , 1987, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

[2]  E. Mayr.  Answers to these comments , 1987 .

[3]  Genealogical actors in ecological roles , 1987 .

[4]  M. Ghiselin,et al.  Species concepts, individuality, and objectivity , 1987 .

[5]  P. Kitcher.  Ghostly whispers: Mayr, Ghiselin, and the “Philosophers” on the ontological status of species , 1987 .

[6]  J. Avise.  Mitochondrial DNA and the evolutionary genetics of higher animals. , 1986, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[7]  D. Jablonski.  Background and Mass Extinctions: The Alternation of Macroevolutionary Regimes , 1986, Science.

[8]  O. Rieppel.  Species Are Individuals , 1986 .

[9]  Henry C. Byerly,et al.  Sex and the emergence of species. , 1985, Journal of theoretical biology.

[10]  Mary B. Williams.  Species Are Individuals: Theoretical Foundations for the Claim , 1985, Philosophy of Science.

[11]  B. Mishler.  The Morphological, Developmental, and Phylogenetic Basis of Species Concepts in Bryophytes , 1985 .

[12]  M. Donoghue.  A Critique of the Biological Species Concept and Recommendations for a Phylogenetic Alternative , 1985 .

[13]  N. Eldredge.  Unfinished Synthesis: Biological Hierarchies and Modern Evolutionary Thought , 1985 .

[14]  P. Kitcher.  Against the Monism of the Moment: A Reply to Elliott Sober , 1984, Philosophy of Science.

[15]  R. Bernier.  The Species as an Individual: Facing Essentialism , 1984 .

[16]  K. Holsinger.  The Nature of Biological Species , 1984, Philosophy of Science.

[17]  E. Sober.  Sets, Species, and Evolution: Comments on Philip Kitcher's "Species" , 1984, Philosophy of Science.

[18]  D. Hull.  Can Kripke Alone Save Essentialism? A Reply to Kitts , 1984 .

[19]  D. Kitts.  The Names of Species: A Reply to Hull , 1984 .

[20]  J. Beatty.  Pluralism and Panselectionism , 1984, PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association.

[21]  D. Kitts.  CAN BAPTISM ALONE SAVE A SPECIES , 1983 .

[22]  Joel Cracraft,et al.  Species Concepts and Speciation Analysis , 1983 .

[23]  Brent D. Mishler,et al.  Species Concepts: A Case for Pluralism , 1982 .

[24]  Gareth Nelson,et al.  Systematics and Biogeography: Cladistics and Vicariance , 1981 .

[25]  E. Wiley.  Phylogenetics: The Theory and Practice of Phylogenetic Systematics , 1981 .

[26]  David Sloan Wilson,et al.  The Natural Selection Of Populations And Communities , 1981 .

[27]  E. Wiley.  Is the Evolutionary Species Fiction?—A Consideration of Classes, Individuals and Historical Entities , 1980 .

[28]  M. J. Lawrence,et al.  The natural selection , 1980, Nature.

[29]  Stephen Jay Gould,et al.  Is a new and general theory of evolution emerging? , 1980, Paleobiology.

[30]  S. Gould,et al.  The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: a critique of the adaptationist programme , 1979, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[31]  K. Bremer,et al.  Geographic Populations or Biological Species in Phylogeny Reconstruction , 1979 .

[32]  D. Rosen.  Fishes from the uplands and intermontane basins of Guatemala : revisionary studies and comparative geography. Bulletin of the AMNH ; v. 162, article 5 , 1979 .

[33]  D. Hull.  A Matter of Individuality , 1978, Philosophy of Science.

[34]  E. Wiley,et al.  The Evolutionary Species Concept Reconsidered , 1978 .

[35]  D. Hull.  Are Species Really Individuals , 1976 .

[36]  M. Ghiselin.  A Radical Solution to the Species Problem , 1974 .

[37]  Mary B. Williams,et al.  Deducing the consequences of evolution: a mathematical model. , 1970, Journal of theoretical biology.

[38]  G. Simpson.  Principles of Animal Taxonomy , 1961 .