Empowering and engaging industrial workers with Operator 4.0 solutions

Abstract Industry 4.0 has potential for qualitative enrichment of factory work: a more interesting working environment, greater autonomy and opportunities for self-development. A central element of Industry 4.0 is human-centricity, described as development towards Operator 4.0. Our Operator 4.0 vision includes smart factories of the future that are perfectly suited for workers with different skills, capabilities and preferences. The vision is achieved by solutions that empower the workers and engage the work community. Empowering the worker is based on adapting the factory shop floor to the skills, capabilities and needs of the worker and supporting the worker to understand and to develop his/her competence. Engaging the work community is based on tools, with which the workers can participate in designing their work and training, and share their knowledge with each other. We gathered requirements from three manufacturing companies in different industries and interviewed 44 workers in four factories in order to study their expectations and concerns related to the proposed Operator 4.0 solutions. Adaptation was considered useful both in manufacturing systems and in production planning. However, worker measuring and modelling raised many doubts within workers and also with factory management. Therefore it is important to provide early demonstrations of the ideas and to design them further with the workers in order to find acceptable and ethically sustainable ways for worker modelling. The workers would like to be more involved in the design of the work place and manufacturing processes, and they thought that participation would decrease many problems that they currently face in their work. However, there were also doubts concerning whether they really could have possibilities to impact on their work. The results show that there are clear needs for knowledge sharing and adaptive learning solutions that would support personalized competence development and learning while working. An easily accessible platform for knowledge sharing could evolve to a forum where good work practices and ways to solve problems are shared not only within the work community, but also with machine providers and other stakeholders. The interviewees saw the virtual factory as a promising platform for participatory design and training.

[1]  Ashutosh Tiwari,et al.  Discrete Event Simulation and Virtual Reality Use in Industry: New Opportunities and Future Trends , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems.

[2]  Marcel Bogers,et al.  on Intelligent Manufacturing and Automation , 2013 The Smart Factory : Exploring Adaptive and Flexible Manufacturing Solutions , 2014 .

[3]  Christina Maslach,et al.  THE TRUTH ABOUT BURNOUT , 1997 .

[4]  Bofeng Zhang,et al.  User Model Evolution Algorithm: Forgetting and Reenergizing User Preference , 2011, 2011 International Conference on Internet of Things and 4th International Conference on Cyber, Physical and Social Computing.

[5]  Ilkka Korhonen,et al.  Personal Health Technologies in Employee Health Promotion: Usage Activity, Usefulness, and Health-Related Outcomes in a 1-Year Randomized Controlled Trial , 2013, JMIR mHealth and uHealth.

[6]  Jerry Banks,et al.  Discrete Event Simulation , 2002, Encyclopedia of Information Systems.

[7]  Dimitris Mavrikios,et al.  A Two-way Knowledge Interaction in Manufacturing Education: The Teaching Factory , 2015 .

[8]  V. Braun,et al.  Using thematic analysis in psychology , 2006 .

[9]  Hans-Georg Kemper,et al.  Application-Pull and Technology-Push as Driving Forces for the Fourth Industrial Revolution , 2014 .

[10]  Alasdair Gilchrist Industry 4.0 , 2016, Apress.

[11]  Petr Skobelev,et al.  “Smart Factory”: Intelligent System for Workshop Resource Allocation, Scheduling, Optimization and Controlling in Real Time , 2012 .

[12]  Brahim Hnich,et al.  SIMULTANEOUS BALANCING AND SCHEDULING OF FLEXIBLE MIXED MODEL ASSEMBLY LINES WITH SEQUENCE DEPENDENT TASK TIME INCREMENTS , 2010 .

[13]  Karen Holtzblatt,et al.  Contextual design , 1997, INTR.

[14]  John A. Sharp,et al.  A review of manufacturing flexibility , 2000, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[15]  George Chryssolouris,et al.  On industrial learning and training for the factories of the future: a conceptual, cognitive and technology framework , 2013, J. Intell. Manuf..

[16]  Johan Stahre,et al.  TOWARDS AN OPERATOR 4.0 TYPOLOGY: A HUMAN-CENTRIC PERSPECTIVE ON THE FOURTH INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION TECHNOLOGIES , 2016 .

[17]  Dianliang Wu,et al.  Collaborative Virtual Assembly Operation Simulation and Its Application , 2011 .

[18]  Eberhard Abele,et al.  Forty Sixth CIRP Conference on Manufacturing Systems 2013 A systematic approach on developing action-oriented , competency-based Learning Factories , 2013 .

[19]  Chi-Sheng Shih,et al.  Model-Based Development of User-Centric Automation and Assistive Devices/Systems , 2012, IEEE Systems Journal.

[20]  Anil Mital,et al.  Advanced technologies and humans in manufacturing workplaces: an interdependent relationship , 2004 .

[21]  Ing,et al.  Review and reappraisal of adaptive interfaces : toward biologically inspired paradigms , 2002 .

[22]  Antonio Padovano,et al.  Smart operators in industry 4.0: A human-centered approach to enhance operators' capabilities and competencies within the new smart factory context , 2017, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[23]  Johan Stahre,et al.  Enabling flexible manufacturing systems by using level of automation as design parameter , 2009, Proceedings of the 2009 Winter Simulation Conference (WSC).

[24]  Ashutosh Tiwari,et al.  Immersive Mixed Reality for Manufacturing Training , 2017, Front. Robot. AI.

[25]  Frank Biocca,et al.  Comparative effectiveness of augmented reality in object assembly , 2003, CHI '03.

[26]  Manfred Tscheligi,et al.  User Experience Research in the Semiconductor Factory: A Contradiction? , 2011, INTERACT.

[27]  Andrew Y. C. Nee,et al.  Augmented reality for collaborative product design and development , 2010 .

[28]  Paul E. Spector Job satisfaction: application, assessment, cause, and consequences , 1997 .

[29]  Woodrow Barfield,et al.  Evaluating the effectiveness of augmented reality displays for a manual assembly task , 1999, Virtual Reality.

[30]  Petr Skobelev,et al.  Multi-Agent System Smart Factory for Real-Time Workshop Management in Aircraft Jet Engines Production , 2013 .

[31]  Steven Hogg,et al.  Wearable augmented virtual reality for enhancing information delivery in high precision defence assembly: an engineering case study , 2004, Virtual Reality.

[32]  E. A. Locke The nature and causes of job satisfaction , 1976 .

[33]  Åsa Fast-Berglund,et al.  The Operator 4.0: Human Cyber-Physical Systems & Adaptive Automation Towards Human-Automation Symbiosis Work Systems , 2016, APMS.

[35]  Eberhard Abele,et al.  Learning factory design: a competency-oriented approach integrating three design levels , 2016, Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf..

[36]  Timo Määttä Virtual environments in machinery safety analysis and participatory ergonomics , 2007 .

[37]  Steven K. Feiner,et al.  Augmented reality in the psychomotor phase of a procedural task , 2011, 2011 10th IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality.

[38]  Brahim Hnich,et al.  Simultaneous Balancing and Scheduling of Flexible Mixed Model Assembly Lines with Sequence-Dependent Setup Times , 2010, Electron. Notes Discret. Math..

[39]  Simo-Pekka Leino,et al.  Reframing the Value of Virtual Prototyping. Intermediary virtual prototyping - the evolving approach of virtual environments based virtual prototyping in the context of new product development and low volume production , 2015 .

[40]  Fabio Bruno,et al.  Product interface design: A participatory approach based on virtual reality , 2010, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[41]  Michael J. Muller,et al.  Participatory design , 1993, CACM.

[42]  Jozef Novák Marcincin,et al.  Augmented Reality Aided Manufacturing , 2013, VARE.

[43]  Dimitris Mourtzis,et al.  The Evolution of Manufacturing Systems: From Craftsmanship to the Era of Customisation , 2014 .

[44]  Edward R. Alef,et al.  The Learning Factory , 1996 .

[45]  T. Judge,et al.  Employee attitudes and job satisfaction , 2004 .

[46]  Kai Mertins,et al.  Knowledge management : concepts and best practices , 2003 .

[47]  Heeseok Lee,et al.  The Impact of Information Technology and Transactive Memory Systems on Knowledge Sharing, Application, and Team Performance: A Field Study , 2010, MIS Q..

[48]  Pelle Ehn,et al.  Scandinavian Design: On Participation and Skill , 1992, Usability - Turning Technologies into Tools.

[49]  A. Gogh The impact of information technology. , 1997, Caring : National Association for Home Care magazine.

[50]  Eeva Järvenpää,et al.  Capability-based Adaptation of Production Systems in a Changing Environment , 2012 .

[51]  Chorkaew Jaturanonda,et al.  ANALYTIC-BASED DECISION ANALYSIS TOOL FOR EMPLOYEE-JOB ASSIGNMENTS BASED ON COMPETENCY AND JOB PREFERENCE , 2011 .

[52]  Monica Bordegoni,et al.  An Augmented Reality Framework for Supporting and Monitoring Operators during Maintenance Tasks , 2014, HCI.

[53]  A. Bakker,et al.  The Measurement of Engagement and Burnout: A Two Sample Confirmatory Factor Analytic Approach , 2002 .

[54]  I. Nonaka A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation , 1994 .

[55]  Juhani Heilala,et al.  Human touch to efficient modular assembly system , 1997 .

[56]  Wilmar B. Schaufeli,et al.  Defining and measuring work engagement : Bringing clarity to the concept , 2010 .

[57]  Kasper Edwards,et al.  Design of systems for productivity and well being. , 2014, Applied ergonomics.

[58]  Jacques Carlier,et al.  Handbook of Scheduling - Algorithms, Models, and Performance Analysis , 2004 .

[59]  Hoda A. ElMaraghy,et al.  Flexible and reconfigurable manufacturing systems paradigms , 2005 .

[60]  Päivi Heikkilä,et al.  Quantified factory worker: designing a worker feedback dashboard , 2018, NordiCHI.

[61]  Ole Broberg,et al.  Participatory workspace design: A new approach for ergonomists? , 2010 .

[62]  Mathias Schmitt,et al.  Human-machine-interaction in the industry 4.0 era , 2014, 2014 12th IEEE International Conference on Industrial Informatics (INDIN).

[63]  Iina Aaltonen,et al.  Use of wearable and augmented reality technologies in industrial maintenance work , 2016, MindTrek.

[64]  Francesco M. Donini,et al.  Semantic-based Approach to Task Assignment of Individual Profiles , 2004, J. Univers. Comput. Sci..

[65]  R. Jones Securing the Future. , 2017, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.