Increasing the Performance of Cortically-Controlled Prostheses

Neural prostheses have received considerable attention due to their potential to dramatically improve the quality of life of severely disabled patients. Cortically-controlled prostheses are able to translate neural activity from cerebral cortex into control signals for guiding computer cursors or prosthetic limbs. Non-invasive and invasive electrode techniques can be used to measure neural activity, with the latter promising considerably higher levels of performance and therefore functionality to patients. We review here some of our recent experimental and computational work aimed at establishing a principled design methodology to increase electrode-based cortical prosthesis performance to near theoretical limits. Studies discussed include translating unprecedentedly brief periods of "plan" activity into high information rate (6.5 bits/s)control signals, improving decode algorithms and optimizing visual target locations for further performance increases, and recording from chronically implanted arrays in freely behaving monkeys to characterize neuron stability. Taken together, these results should substantially increase the clinical viability of cortical prostheses.

[1]  R. Andersen,et al.  Cognitive Control Signals for Neural Prosthetics , 2004, Science.

[2]  Byron M. Yu,et al.  Trial - by - trial mean normalization improves plan period reach target decoding , 2005 .

[3]  David M. Santucci,et al.  Learning to Control a Brain–Machine Interface for Reaching and Grasping by Primates , 2003, PLoS biology.

[4]  Byron M. Yu,et al.  Extracting Dynamical Structure Embedded in Neural Activity , 2005, NIPS.

[5]  V. Gilja,et al.  Multiday Electrophysiological Recordings from Freely Behaving Primates , 2006, 2006 International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[6]  S. Meagher.  Instant neural control of a movement signal , 2002 .

[7]  S.I. Ryu,et al.  An extensible infrastructure for fully automated spike sorting during online experiments , 2004, The 26th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[8]  V. Gilja,et al.  An Autonomous, Broadband, Multi-channel Neural Recording System for Freely Behaving Primates , 2006, 2006 International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[9]  D.M. Taylor,et al.  Information conveyed through brain-control: cursor versus robot , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[10]  A. Schwartz,et al.  Motor cortical activity during drawing movements: population representation during lemniscate tracing. , 1999 .

[11]  Gerwin Schalk,et al.  A brain–computer interface using electrocorticographic signals in humans , 2004, Journal of neural engineering.

[12]  A. Schwartz,et al.  Motor cortical activity during drawing movements: population representation during lemniscate tracing. , 1999, Journal of neurophysiology.

[13]  Byron M. Yu,et al.  Optimal Target Placement for Neural Communication Prostheses , 2006, 2006 International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[14]  V. Gilja,et al.  Neural Recording Stability of Chronic Electrode Arrays in Freely Behaving Primates , 2006, 2006 International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[15]  J.P. Donoghue,et al.  Reliability of signals from a chronically implanted, silicon-based electrode array in non-human primate primary motor cortex , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[16]  J. Kalaska,et al.  Covariation of primate dorsal premotor cell activity with direction and amplitude during a memorized-delay reaching task. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[17]  Jonathan R Wolpaw,et al.  Control of a two-dimensional movement signal by a noninvasive brain-computer interface in humans. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  P. Tresco,et al.  Response of brain tissue to chronically implanted neural electrodes , 2005, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[19]  Dawn M. Taylor,et al.  Direct Cortical Control of 3D Neuroprosthetic Devices , 2002, Science.

[20]  Byron M. Yu,et al.  Mixture of Trajectory Models for Neural Decoding of Goal-directed Movements a Computational Model of Craving and Obsession Decoding Visual Inputs from Multiple Neurons in the Human Temporal Lobe Encoding Contribution of Individual Retinal Ganglion Cell Responses to Velocity and Acceleration , 2008 .

[21]  Teresa H. Y. Meng,et al.  Model-based neural decoding of reaching movements: a maximum likelihood approach , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[22]  R. Andersen,et al.  Neural prosthetic control signals from plan activity , 2003, Neuroreport.

[23]  Byron M. Yu,et al.  Neural Variability in Premotor Cortex Provides a Signature of Motor Preparation , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[24]  P. Kennedy,et al.  Restoration of neural output from a paralyzed patient by a direct brain connection , 1998, Neuroreport.

[25]  K.V. Shenoy,et al.  Power feasibility of implantable digital spike sorting circuits for neural prosthetic systems , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[26]  Byron M. Yu,et al.  A high-performance brain–computer interface , 2006, Nature.