Foot ulceration: hypotheses concerning shear and vertical forces acting on adjacent regions of skin.

During gait the plantar surface of the foot experiences distributed shear and compressive stresses due to tangential and vertical forces respectively. At any given point under a foot, the ratio of tangential/vertical forces gives a value (mu Rmin) for the minimum coefficient of friction required to prevent slipping. If mu Rmin is greater than the actual coefficient of friction (mu A), then localized slipping will occur. Three possible scenarios exist which could lead to skin ulceration: at a localized area the skin may tend to slip (i) towards, (ii) away from or (iii) parallel to a neighboring skin region where mu Rmin < or = mu A (i.e. a region that doesn't slip). The first of these possibilities is similar in concept to the loading conditions that lead to a carpet becoming 'wrinkled', i.e. one region of the carpet slips towards another that is stationary. The second and third possibilities would tend to cause tearing in the carpet or shearing of its fabric respectively. In terms of skin breakdown the relative importance of each of these biomechanical hypotheses needs to be determined.

[1]  D. Garfinkel,et al.  Foot problems in athletes. , 1984, The Journal of family practice.

[2]  A. Boulton.  The Diabetic Foot: Neuropathic in Aetiology? , 1990 .

[3]  G. Xakellis,et al.  Characteristics of Skin Blood Flow over the Trochanter under Constant, Prolonged Pressure , 1989, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[4]  P. Dykes,et al.  Plantar hyperkeratosis: a study of callosities and normal plantar skin. , 1985, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[5]  P. Naylor.  THE SKIN SURFACE AND FRICTION. , 1955, The British journal of dermatology.

[6]  J P Pollard,et al.  Forces under the foot. , 1983, Journal of biomedical engineering.

[7]  I A Stokes,et al.  The neuropathic ulcer and loads on the foot in diabetic patients. , 1975, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[8]  L. Bennett,et al.  Vertical shear existence in animal pressure threshold experiments. , 1988, Decubitus.

[9]  D. Sims,et al.  Risk Factors in the Diabetic Foot , 1988 .

[10]  J. Czerniecki,et al.  Circulatory and mechanical response of skin to loading , 1989, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[11]  Spence Wr,et al.  New insole for prevention of athletic blisters. , 1968 .

[12]  ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF CALLOSITIES, CORNS AND WARTS. * , 1932 .

[13]  N. Levine.  Dermatologic aspects of sports medicine. , 1980, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[14]  J. Pollard,et al.  Method of healing diabetic forefoot ulcers. , 1983 .

[15]  J W Tappin,et al.  Study of the relative timing of shear forces on the sole of the forefoot during walking. , 1991, Journal of biomedical engineering.

[16]  L. Bennett,et al.  Shear vs pressure as causative factors in skin blood flow occlusion. , 1979, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[17]  M. Dhanendran,et al.  Vertical forces acting on the feet of diabetic patients with neuropathic ulceration , 1981, The British journal of surgery.

[18]  Dinsdale Sm,et al.  Decubitus ulcers: role of pressure and friction in causation. , 1974, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[19]  J W Tappin,et al.  Method of measuring 'shearing' forces on the sole of the foot , 1980 .

[20]  W. Spence,et al.  Prevention of blisters, callosities and ulcers by absorption of shear forces. , 1968, Journal of the American Podiatry Association.