Evaluation of Forward Collision Avoidance system using driver's hazard perception

Evaluating the performance of Forward Collision Avoidance Technologies (FCATs) is essential in the early stage of the system testing. Drivers are the key interaction parts between the FCATs and vehicles, which play an important role in the performance evaluation. This paper proposes a practical method to evaluate the performance of FCATs by using a novel driver hazard perception measure, namely driver's risk response time. This measure describes the driver's awareness of potential collision risk, which is defined based on the Time-to-collision (TTC) and driver's brake response in a near-crash scenario. A two-month naturalistic driving experiment has been conducted using a vehicle equipped with one FCAT, i.e., Collision Mitigation Brake System (CMBS). An interval-based cumulative frequency data pretreatment method is used to extract near-crashes. Then, the hazard perception measure is computed in near-crashes with CMBS on and off, which can show the effectiveness of CMBS. The results demonstrate that CMBS is highly-positive in improving driver's hazard perception, especially in speed range between 45 km/h and 60 km/h. This fact is consistent with the expected effect of CMBS, which shows the proposed measure for hazard perception is capable of describing drivers' awareness of collision risk. In addition, this measure is applicable to assess the performance of FCATs during the function designing stage.

[1]  Jianqiang Wang,et al.  Driving risk assessment using cluster analysis based on naturalistic driving data , 2014, 17th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC).

[2]  Tal Oron-Gilad,et al.  Drivers' perception of vulnerable road users: a hazard perception approach. , 2012, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[3]  R. Hyman Stimulus information as a determinant of reaction time. , 1953, Journal of experimental psychology.

[4]  Huei Peng,et al.  Evaluation of automotive forward collision warning and collision avoidance algorithms , 2005 .

[5]  Paul P Jovanis,et al.  Crashes and crash-surrogate events: exploratory modeling with naturalistic driving data. , 2012, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[6]  Tarak Gandhi,et al.  Pedestrian Protection Systems: Issues, Survey, and Challenges , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[7]  Thomas A. Dingus,et al.  An overview of the 100-car naturalistic study and findings , 2005 .

[8]  Jianqiang Wang,et al.  Driving risk assessment using near-crash database through data mining of tree-based model. , 2015, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[9]  Heiko Johannsen,et al.  Observation of Front Seat Passenger Posture and Motion in Driving Manoeuvres , 2014 .

[10]  Hampton C. Gabler,et al.  Safety Benefits of Forward Collision Warning, Brake Assist, and Autonomous Braking Systems in Rear-End Collisions , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[11]  August Burgett,et al.  Safety Impact Methodology (SIM): Application and Results of the Advanced Crash Avoidance Technologies (ACAT) Program , 2011 .

[12]  Jianqiang Wang,et al.  Longitudinal collision mitigation via coordinated braking of multiple vehicles using model predictive control , 2015, Integr. Comput. Aided Eng..

[13]  C. Hydén THE DEVELOPMENT OF A METHOD FOR TRAFFIC SAFETY EVALUATION: THE SWEDISH TRAFFIC CONFLICTS TECHNIQUE , 1987 .

[14]  Daniel V. McGehee,et al.  Collision Warning Timing, Driver Distraction, and Driver Response to Imminent Rear-End Collisions in a High-Fidelity Driving Simulator , 2002, Hum. Factors.

[15]  Y Fujita,et al.  RADAR BRAKE SYSTEM , 1995 .

[16]  R. Michael Van Auken,et al.  Extension of the Honda-DRI Safety Impact Methodology for the NHTSA Advanced Crash Avoidance Technology (ACAT) Program and Application to the Evaluation of an Advanced Collision Mitigation Braking System - Final Results of the ACAT-I Program , 2011 .

[17]  Tal Oron-Gilad,et al.  Driving Speed of Young Novice and Experienced Drivers in Simulated Hazard Anticipation Scenes , 2015, Hum. Factors.

[18]  Azim Eskandarian,et al.  Research advances in intelligent collision avoidance and adaptive cruise control , 2003, IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst..

[19]  John Shutko,et al.  An Investigation of Collision Avoidance Warnings on Brake Response Times of Commercial Motor Vehicle Drivers , 1999 .