Randomized Trial and Pharmacokinetic Study of Pegfilgrastim versus Filgrastim after Dose-Intensive Chemotherapy in Young Adults and Children with Sarcomas

Purpose: To compare the effectiveness, tolerance, and pharmacokinetics of a single dose of pegfilgrastim to daily filgrastim in children and young adults with sarcomas treated with dose-intensive combination chemotherapy. Experimental Design: Patients were randomized to receive a single dose of 100 mcg/kg of pegfilgrastim s.c. or 5 mcg/kg/day of filgrastim s.c., daily until neutrophil recovery after two treatment cycles with vincristine, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide (VDC) and two cycles of etoposide and ifosfamide (IE). The duration of severe neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count, ≤500/mcL) during cycles 1 to 4 and cycle duration for all cycles were compared. Pharmacokinetics of pegfilgrastim and filgrastim and CD34+ stem cell mobilization were studied on cycle 1. Growth factor–related toxicity, transfusions, and episodes of fever and neutropenia and infections were collected for cycles 1 to 4. Results: Thirty-four patients (median age, 20 years; range 3.8-25.8) were enrolled, and 32 completed cycles 1 to 4. The median (range) duration of absolute neutrophil count of <500/mcL was 5.5 (3-8) days for pegfilgrastim and 6 (0-9) days for filgrastim (P = 0.76) after VDC, and 1.5 (0-4) days for pegfilgrastim and 3.75 (0-6.5) days for filgrastim (P = 0.11) after IE. More episodes of febrile neutropenia and documented infections occurred on the filgrastim arm. Serum pegfilgrastim concentrations were highly variable. Pegfilgrastim apparent clearance (11 mL/h/kg) was similar to that reported in adults. Conclusion: A single dose per cycle of pegfilgrastim was well tolerated and may be as effective as daily filgrastim based on the duration of severe neutropenia and number of episodes of febrile neutropenia and documented infections after dose-intensive treatment with VDC and IE. (Clin Cancer Res 2009;15(23):7361–7)

[1]  G. Lyman,et al.  Comparison of pegfilgrastim with filgrastim on febrile neutropenia, grade IV neutropenia and bone pain: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials , 2007, Current medical research and opinion.

[2]  N. Bhana,et al.  Granulocyte colony-stimulating factors in the management of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia: evidence based review , 2007, Current opinion in oncology.

[3]  N. André,et al.  Safety and efficacy of pegfilgrastim in children with cancer receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy , 2007, Anti-cancer drugs.

[4]  Gisela Schwab,et al.  Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Modeling of Pegfilgrastim in Healthy Subjects , 2006, Journal of clinical pharmacology.

[5]  Thomas J. Smith,et al.  2006 update of recommendations for the use of white blood cell growth factors: an evidence-based clinical practice guideline. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[6]  I. Bruns,et al.  A single dose of 6 or 12 mg of pegfilgrastim for peripheral blood progenitor cell mobilization results in similar yields of CD34+ progenitors in patients with multiple myeloma , 2006, Transfusion.

[7]  W. Kamps,et al.  Pegfilgrastim in Pediatric Cancer Patients , 2005, Journal of pediatric hematology/oncology.

[8]  C. Urban,et al.  Once-Per-Cycle Pegfilgrastim Versus Daily Filgrastim in Pediatric Patients With Ewing Sarcoma , 2005, Journal of pediatric hematology/oncology.

[9]  B. Wiens,et al.  First and subsequent cycle use of pegfilgrastim prevents febrile neutropenia in patients with breast cancer: a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III study. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[10]  P. Nathan,et al.  Prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor decrease febrile neutropenia after chemotherapy in children with cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. , 2004, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[11]  N. Jaffe,et al.  Safety and efficacy of pegfilgrastim in pediatric oncology patients: The M.D. Anderson Cancer Center experience. , 2004, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[12]  L. Roskos,et al.  Polyethylene glycol modification of filgrastim results in decreased renal clearance of the protein in rats. , 2004, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[13]  G. Molineux The design and development of pegfilgrastim (PEG-rmetHuG-CSF, Neulasta). , 2004, Current pharmaceutical design.

[14]  William C Zamboni,et al.  Pharmacokinetics of Pegfilgrastim , 2003, Pharmacotherapy.

[15]  W. Leslie,et al.  Selective Cyclooxygenase‐2 Inhibition: A Target in Cancer Prevention and Treatment , 2003, Pharmacotherapy.

[16]  M. Piccart,et al.  A randomized double-blind multicenter phase III study of fixed-dose single-administration pegfilgrastim versus daily filgrastim in patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy. , 2003, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[17]  J. Crawford Neutrophil growth factors. , 2002, Current hematology reports.

[18]  L. R. Hill,et al.  Blinded, randomized, multicenter study to evaluate single administration pegfilgrastim once per cycle versus daily filgrastim as an adjunct to chemotherapy in patients with high-risk stage II or stage III/IV breast cancer. , 2002, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[19]  J. Crawford,et al.  Randomized, dose-escalation study of SD/01 compared with daily filgrastim in patients receiving chemotherapy. , 2000, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[20]  Shaun Parsons,et al.  Growth factor practice patterns among pediatric oncologists: results of a 1998 Pediatric Oncology Group Survey. Economic Evaluation Working Group the Pediatric Oncology Group. , 2000, Journal of pediatric hematology/oncology.

[21]  S. Steinberg,et al.  Ifosfamide and etoposide plus vincristine, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide for newly diagnosed Ewing's sarcoma family of tumors , 1996, Cancer.

[22]  V. Dilsizian,et al.  Randomized trial of the cardioprotective agent ICRF-187 in pediatric sarcoma patients treated with doxorubicin. , 1996, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.